AM6 conflicts (Shannon?)

[robstar]

Listen, do you man. Here's my personal opinion:

-Every time I've added clearing to a sub, it's helped tremendously. I can say that because I've done subs with and without tapping. There's a very obvious difference.
-I have almost 10 years of experience with clearing work and have done countless hours of working with people and doing training.
-I'll agree that PSTEC probably shouldn't be used with subs. That's because PSTEC is a pattern-interrupt clearing. Anything related to EFT is a safe bet, though.
-As I've mentioned countless times, clearing is not programming. That's nonsense. Anyone that says so clearly doesn't use clearing.

I guess the reason there might be debate on here is because the guys picking up tapping are completely new at it and don't know what they're doing. I guess I'm technically a seasoned veteran, so maybe that's where the disconnect is happening.

I haven't done AM6, but when I do, I'll definitely be tapping because that's what I've been doing for years. It's a part of my life. Other guys who are total newbs at tapping may want to hold off or something.

There. Is everybody happy?

I don't know anything about tapping, but I read somewhere on here that AM6 basically corners you into a wall and gives you no choice but to change, wouldn't tapping just uncorner yourself and defeat the point of running the program?

Where does this logic come from? How does consciously dropping garbage that the program is trying to get you to get rid of, defeating the point of the program at all? The program is trying to change you. How could helping get rid of the resistance to making those changes hinder it?