(09-14-2016, 02:29 PM)4Kingdoms Wrote:

(09-14-2016, 11:36 AM)CatMan Wrote: Don't feel bad, I have it too.

I have to use stalls in public washrooms, never use a urinal. And I can't take a #2 in a public washroom, regardless. Makes for some very irritating logistical concerns.

Catman, first thanks for sharing. I'm curious if 2.4 has helped overcome bladder shyness??

RTBoss recognized it when it happened. I noticed it, but didn't connect the dots that it was 2.4

(09-14-2016, 11:44 PM)CatMan Wrote: I don't even bother anymore going to urinals, going to stalls is so ingrained.

(09-14-2016, 05:26 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Wow... ***** hell. No way. A public urinal..

I've not seen that before. I have the same issue if theres other people in the urinal I can't go so I usually go into the cubicle. This really sucks in a busy nightclub or something where there's a line for the toilet.

(09-15-2016, 09:27 AM)Shannon Wrote: Congratulations! You figured it out. Not the surprise, but the fact that the current goal phrasing isn't designed to affect just any person you encounter of a specific gender.

This one is a sniper.

Quote:Ben if you watch that video again and others like it. The biggest turn off for me about it is there is no sink to wash your hands when you finish.

(09-15-2016, 01:44 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Regarding the surprise, Shannon, I know you don't want to reveal what it is yet. But can you tell is if you have seen in any of our journals that some of us have exhibited signs of the surprise yet?

(09-15-2016, 09:09 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have seen its effects in almost all of your journals.

(09-15-2016, 11:03 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Interesting. I hope you reveal what it is soon.

(09-16-2016, 12:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: It will probably be revealed shortly before 3.0 is released.

(09-15-2016, 10:36 AM)Shannon Wrote: Hmmm. 5 (continuous) loops a day. Not 2.

(09-15-2016, 10:46 AM)RTBoss Wrote: ...which leaves me to listen during sleep and feeling exhausted every morning. But ok, I'll stick with the five from here on out.

Would you clarify for me what the next best option is? If you happen to not get five loops in (for whatever reason), then what? Two? None? Two when you got the time for two, then three more when you can, and then back to five loops the next night?

(09-15-2016, 09:35 PM)Shannon Wrote: I didn't tell you a secondary option this time because I want you to run the primary option. At this point, I think you're beginning to understand why. The right amount of exposure is tiring, yes, but also balances itself well for the work that it is doing under the hood.

5 (continuous loops per) day. No excuses.

(09-15-2016, 10:32 PM)Raz Wrote: Coming fresh from the press and, although I am not far into it yet, it promises to become an eye-opening book about setting the frame for injecting ideas and persuading people. Robert Cialdini.

(09-15-2016, 09:27 AM)Shannon Wrote: Congratulations! You figured it out. Not the surprise, but the fact that the current goal phrasing isn't designed to affect just any person you encounter of a specific gender.

This one is a sniper.

(09-19-2016, 01:59 AM)Shannon Wrote: The sniping effect is looking for women who are genuinely attractive to you. So as I said before, all women will get the baseline, but it will snipe and focus on the ones who are GENUINELY attractive to you. In the process, you're not going to be weeding out women you would have actually been genuinely attracted to or compatible with. It's not something to be feared; it's a time saver and a problem preventative. Higher quality results.

(09-22-2016, 02:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: The sniper effect is based on the concept of focusing on specific attributes that you find attractive, and according to how attractive you find them. So when you come across a woman who has a stunning body, that's what will be the basis for the auric sniping. If she's plain, but has what you consider a sexy brain, then her brain will be the basis for the auric sniping. The more types of things about her that you find sexually attractive, and the more sexually attractive you find them, the more powerful the sniping effect becomes. It's not narrowing anything; all women get baseline aura effect. But a woman who has any trait you find attractive will get more for each such trait, and more according to how attractive it is to you.

This has nothing to do with the manifestation modules. Those are actually going to get a complete overhaul, since I want to get them to behave in a synergistic manner and aim more specifically to manifest sex.

(09-18-2016, 09:30 AM)Steven Wrote: I was also wondering if it's theoretically possible to put something in the DMSI series so

1) that the people who the user finds or would find sexually attractive manifest the user into their lives, and

2) that people who the user finds or would find sexually attractive go on autopilot in such a way that they take effective action to fulfill the goals of the program with the user.

(09-18-2016, 10:21 AM)Shannon Wrote: The first one is already in the program. The second was slated for 3.0.

Shannon Wrote:I have been working on the 6G prototype today and I stumbled across a specific wording that happens to be very effective so far in the models for getting past resistance. I am very pleased, and this looks like something simple enough that I should be able to add it to DMSI 3.0 without much challenge - if, of course, it survives enough modeling runs.

Shannon Wrote:New method of getting past resistance PASSES initiatory modeling and testing. It will be included in 6G, and DMSI. Very pleased indeed.

Shannon Wrote:I think I have discovered something that could be used in DMSI to get people to initiate sex more frequently. And if it pans out in further testing... much more frequently.