Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 12-07-2016

Quote:You know you're running it too loud if you start getting headaches or nausea from a track with ultrasonic in it. This is not necessarily going to mean it;s too loud, though. You could also be getting a headache from resisting something that you are trying to heal and clear, which sounds more likely to me in this case.

Hmm interesting, would the headache only be when listening to it? I've bumped up my hours of listening on E2 and most of today I had a headache, through the day I only listen to ocean surf, but I also turned up the volume of ultrasonic at night. I'm guessing for me it's either the increased input or resisting something it's trying to heal.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016

(12-07-2016, 03:51 AM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:You know you're running it too loud if you start getting headaches or nausea from a track with ultrasonic in it. This is not necessarily going to mean it;s too loud, though. You could also be getting a headache from resisting something that you are trying to heal and clear, which sounds more likely to me in this case.

Hmm interesting, would the headache only be when listening to it? I've bumped up my hours of listening on E2 and most of today I had a headache, through the day I only listen to ocean surf, but I also turned up the volume of ultrasonic at night. I'm guessing for me it's either the increased input or resisting something it's trying to heal.

The headaches caused by ultrasonic at a volume that is too high dissipate in 5 to 7 minutes when the audio is stopped. That has to be something else.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 12-07-2016

(12-06-2016, 02:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 02:46 PM)Travis Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 01:28 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: this leads me to think the clearing in 3.0.1a has something in it to prevent re-dosing of ANY type of thing that makes us feel "good" in a "feeling seeking" type of way. thereby also preventing seeking the euphoria of the program. for someone who has an insanely addictive personality, i don't find myself wanting to re-dose on the sub any more or any less than the prescribed amount of 3 loops.

I haven't looked at porn since v3.0.1. The desire to look at it has gone away.

If I quit because of v3.0.1a that would be an amazing side effect.

Did you ever consider that maybe porn was getting in the way of you getting to real sex with a real woman? Whether directly so or as a side effect, if porn is preventing you from achieving the goals of DMSI "A" version, it will kill your interest in porn. Dead.

Shannon , does version A and B have diferent goals?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016

(12-07-2016, 04:06 AM)bogdy Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 02:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 02:46 PM)Travis Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 01:28 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: this leads me to think the clearing in 3.0.1a has something in it to prevent re-dosing of ANY type of thing that makes us feel "good" in a "feeling seeking" type of way. thereby also preventing seeking the euphoria of the program. for someone who has an insanely addictive personality, i don't find myself wanting to re-dose on the sub any more or any less than the prescribed amount of 3 loops.

I haven't looked at porn since v3.0.1. The desire to look at it has gone away.

If I quit because of v3.0.1a that would be an amazing side effect.

Did you ever consider that maybe porn was getting in the way of you getting to real sex with a real woman? Whether directly so or as a side effect, if porn is preventing you from achieving the goals of DMSI "A" version, it will kill your interest in porn. Dead.

Shannon , does version A and B have diferent goals?

Yes.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Funky Trunks - 12-07-2016

(12-07-2016, 03:51 AM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:You know you're running it too loud if you start getting headaches or nausea from a track with ultrasonic in it. This is not necessarily going to mean it;s too loud, though. You could also be getting a headache from resisting something that you are trying to heal and clear, which sounds more likely to me in this case.

Hmm interesting, would the headache only be when listening to it? I've bumped up my hours of listening on E2 and most of today I had a headache, through the day I only listen to ocean surf, but I also turned up the volume of ultrasonic at night. I'm guessing for me it's either the increased input or resisting something it's trying to heal.

That's the thing it's more of a head pressure headache (not painful, just an intense pressure feeling) and it I had it when the US finished. But, like I said, I fell back asleep and woke up fine so maybe it is a resistance thing.

Thanks Shannon, I'll trust in the sub to guide me to the volume.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 12-07-2016

I am having some difficulties in deciding whether to use SM or DMSI here in a few months to help with some sexual healing (got the feelin???) and balancing.

I'm hesitant about using DMSI due to the energy flooding, as I'm sure that rule 4 breaking kundalini issues aren't covered in the return policy. Quick breakdown of my questions.

How much healing is contained in SM vs DMSI? Will it still help a person overcome the issues, maybe just not as well as DMSI?

How driven is an individual to have sex on DMSI? SM contains opt outs for stds, manipulation, not interested, etc. are these all contained in DMSI also?

Is SM primarily an internal reworking whereas DMSI is more a mix between internal and external?

Is DMSI basically the continuation and replacement for SM? Or will that be reworked later on? This question is just curiosity.

I'm more interested in the healing and reworking portion of DMSI than actually getting laid. My concern is the energy flooding. I haven't experienced it and so cannot say how well it'd work for me, especially since self-directed outcomes and energies don't necessarily coincide with kundalini.

Thank you any answers and Input. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 12-07-2016

(12-07-2016, 04:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-07-2016, 04:06 AM)bogdy Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 02:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 02:46 PM)Travis Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 01:28 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: this leads me to think the clearing in 3.0.1a has something in it to prevent re-dosing of ANY type of thing that makes us feel "good" in a "feeling seeking" type of way. thereby also preventing seeking the euphoria of the program. for someone who has an insanely addictive personality, i don't find myself wanting to re-dose on the sub any more or any less than the prescribed amount of 3 loops.

I haven't looked at porn since v3.0.1. The desire to look at it has gone away.

If I quit because of v3.0.1a that would be an amazing side effect.
Did you ever consider that maybe porn was getting in the way of you getting to real sex with a real woman? Whether directly so or as a side effect, if porn is preventing you from achieving the goals of DMSI "A" version, it will kill your interest in porn. Dead.

Shannon , does version A and B have diferent goals?

Yes.

You gave me 1 word answer that means you already posted the goals somewhere else,right? Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016

(12-07-2016, 05:21 AM)bogdy Wrote:
(12-07-2016, 04:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-07-2016, 04:06 AM)bogdy Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 02:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-06-2016, 02:46 PM)Travis Wrote: I haven't looked at porn since v3.0.1. The desire to look at it has gone away.

If I quit because of v3.0.1a that would be an amazing side effect.
Did you ever consider that maybe porn was getting in the way of you getting to real sex with a real woman? Whether directly so or as a side effect, if porn is preventing you from achieving the goals of DMSI "A" version, it will kill your interest in porn. Dead.

Shannon , does version A and B have diferent goals?

Yes.

You gave me 1 word answer that means you already posted the goals somewhere else,right? Smile

Many times, in many places. Including the product description itself.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016

(12-07-2016, 05:02 AM)Nox Wrote: I am having some difficulties in deciding whether to use SM or DMSI here in a few months to help with some sexual healing (got the feelin???) and balancing.

I'm hesitant about using DMSI due to the energy flooding, as I'm sure that rule 4 breaking kundalini issues aren't covered in the return policy. Quick breakdown of my questions.

How much healing is contained in SM vs DMSI? Will it still help a person overcome the issues, maybe just not as well as DMSI?

SM has vastly less clearing and healing than DMSI in effect due to the level of difference in power, technology and sophistication between them.

Quote:How driven is an individual to have sex on DMSI? SM contains opt outs for stds, manipulation, not interested, etc. are these all contained in DMSI also?

The individual is not driven to have sex on DMSI. They are free to have sex or not, at their pleasure. They will engage in Natural Seduction activities, however, which tends to favor sex, as does the level of interest and arousal you cause with DMSI affecting your aura. But driven? No. That's SM.

DMSI 3.1 and later will have STD prevention scripting, but 3.0.1 does not. You will have to use the big head a little bit and put on a condom. I know it's hard, but I have faith in you. Wink

Quote:Is SM primarily an internal reworking whereas DMSI is more a mix between internal and external?

Both are a mix between internal and external, but in different ways and to different degrees. SM is more favoring internal, and DMSI is more well balanced between the two.

Quote:Is DMSI basically the continuation and replacement for SM? Or will that be reworked later on? This question is just curiosity.

No. SM is an extension of and reworking of the results of AM, and DMSI does not seek to make you alpha or keep you alpha. It seeks to make you sexually irresistible regardless of where you start from, but of course this limits you to some degree compared to SM.

Quote:I'm more interested in the healing and reworking portion of DMSI than actually getting laid. My concern is the energy flooding. I haven't experienced it and so cannot say how well it'd work for me, especially since self-directed outcomes and energies don't necessarily coincide with kundalini.

Thank you any answers and Input. Smile

You might be surprised at what the subconscious is capable of.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 12-07-2016

Thank you for your time and answers Shannon.

I do not disagree with you on what the subconscious is capable of, and I have nothing but respect for your ability to develop technologies that work with it. I simply have a slightly different viewpoint is all. Either way there's a reason I only use your stuff over all of the garbage out there. Smile

Have a great day and thank you again.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016

(12-07-2016, 05:44 AM)Nox Wrote: Thank you for your time and answers Shannon.

I do not disagree with you on what the subconscious is capable of, and I have nothing but respect for your ability to develop technologies that work with it. I simply have a slightly different viewpoint is all. Either way there's a reason I only use your stuff over all of the garbage out there. Smile

Have a great day and thank you again.

I have not studied kundalini specifically. Otherwise I would be more specific. But I do know that the scripting is worded with many safeties in place.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 12-07-2016

(12-07-2016, 06:07 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-07-2016, 05:44 AM)Nox Wrote: Thank you for your time and answers Shannon.

I do not disagree with you on what the subconscious is capable of, and I have nothing but respect for your ability to develop technologies that work with it. I simply have a slightly different viewpoint is all. Either way there's a reason I only use your stuff over all of the garbage out there. Smile

Have a great day and thank you again.

I have not studied kundalini specifically. Otherwise I would be more specific. But I do know that the scripting is worded with many safeties in place.

I know you do your best to make everything as safe and effective as possible. It's one of the reasons I continue to buy your products. I have nothing but gratitude for the work you do. Just E2 has made a massive change in a few people I care about a lot.

If I came across as demanding or superior I apologize. It wasnt even close to my intent. In all fairness kundalini most likely won't be an issue with the work you've done to make it safe. If you say it's safe then I trust that. Its just that I have to be a bit more paranoid than I'd like to be.

Thank you again and i appreciate your responses.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016

I take no offense, and you didn't come across in any negative way.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 12-07-2016

Now I think I know what people are talking about when they say there is a beep in the track. First, I don't think there is a real beep in the track, because I heard in in the third loop, but definitely not at the first one. This seem to be some kind of thing that happens when you process the sub information. Even if it may not happen for everyone. Have had something similar on some 5G titles but not that intense. Don't remember having this with 4G or 3G. Anyway, looks like that tone gets created in your head.