Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 11-30-2016

Also about the AP code:

Can we gift a subliminal that we've used, gotten good results from and plan not to use again in the future?

I'm assuming no because of an uneven exchange of value.

And I pirated AOSI v1 after purchasing DMSI. It has since been deleted and the legitimate v1 offered on the site was downloaded. Would that trigger AP code?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 08:16 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 07:37 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,

I think you posted something about automatic detection and rejection of those with STIs but you were wondering about how to prevent rejecting those that might have HPV that didn't cause warts.

"Automatically detect, avoid, and reject sexual opportunities with those who have a contagious disease or transmittable organism that would negatively impact the health, well-being, appearance, or body of the user"

Dang, that's harsh - if a person has the common cold, no sex? HuhWink

Exactly. How do I exclude all STIs except the non-deadly, non-problem causing and non-wart causing strains of HPV that are commonly passed around that 80+% of the population has or has had?

It's not such a simple job I have now, is it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 10:20 AM)LionKing Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 03:41 AM)Shannon Wrote: Is what you did breaking copyright law and therefore illegal?

Not a lawyer, don't know. I suspect they can change too. Do the AP statements refer to "law" or "illegal"?

(11-30-2016, 03:41 AM)Shannon Wrote: Giving it as a gift is not illegal. But buying one copy and retaining copies for yourself and someone else breaks copyright law. One purchase, one owner.

In News, you wrote: "To that end, I suggest that you first and foremost should specifically never pirate my subliminals, or illegally have, own, share, copy, give away, profit from or use them. Save yourself the hassle and worry."

Sure, I will delete my local files. They were there for the purpose of transferring them to her anyway, and now that's done. However, the files are still easily accessible to me through my IML account, so I in my mind I consider that I have them anyway in that storage. Will that be enough to make the AP statements malicious towards me, or is this clearly a non-issue with the current phrasing?

I did look for some sort of option to "Buy as a gift", where I would pay for it with my account, and the system would then send her an email with the links to get the files. If it was there, then I missed it. Wanted to do the purchase for her to make sure it got done, and she didn't start hesitating.

If you have purchased them for her, and have given her what you downloaded, having access to them on your IML account but not downloading or using them is sufficient to remain legal and reasonable.

It is also an option to sit with her and have her create an account, and then have Ben transfer that from your account to her account. We are working on gift certificates, I actually thought we had them...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 10:26 AM)AriGold Wrote: LionKing has a great suggestion.
Not only "buying a gift card", but also the ability to buy it and let the links be sent to the other person without us having the access to that link. Might be a bit difficult to implement into the shop, but more easy for i.e. older people or people that are not used to reading that much in english.

I remember at one point we had GCs, don't know if we still do... I'll have to look. But sending the links to the other person is not something I am sure we can do.

We will find a solution.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 10:44 AM)Ivaylo Wrote: Hey Shannon, you missed my question above about the AP code. Here's the situation again:

(11-30-2016, 03:47 AM)Ivaylo Wrote: - I bought a copy of E2 for my mother, she stores it on a PC that my father also uses occasionally. (not to play subliminals)
- The sub itself is played on a stereo system in the living room 24/7, so my father does get exposed daily, including when my mom isn't home. (otherwise she would definitely forget to turn on the stereo system every time she gets home)

Any of that breaking AP code, Shannon? Thanks! Looking forward to DMSI V3.

#1 is within fair use legally, as far as I know. He just cannot use the subliminals unless he purchased a copy for himself.

#2 Exposing your father while your mother is using the sub is also fair use legally.

You're fine as long as he doesn't directly use, by himself, any subliminal he didn't own. Your mother would own the subs you gave her.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 11:44 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: Also about the AP code:

Can we gift a subliminal that we've used, gotten good results from and plan not to use again in the future?

I'm assuming no because of an uneven exchange of value.

Yes, you can, as long as you delete all copies you have when you do it. If that copy was paid for, then the exchange of agreed upon value has taken place for that one copy.

Quote:And I pirated AOSI v1 after purchasing DMSI. It has since been deleted and the legitimate v1 offered on the site was downloaded. Would that trigger AP code?

No, you deleted it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dutchman610 - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 05:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 08:16 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 07:37 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,

I think you posted something about automatic detection and rejection of those with STIs but you were wondering about how to prevent rejecting those that might have HPV that didn't cause warts.

"Automatically detect, avoid, and reject sexual opportunities with those who have a contagious disease or transmittable organism that would negatively impact the health, well-being, appearance, or body of the user"

Dang, that's harsh - if a person has the common cold, no sex? HuhWink

Exactly. How do I exclude all STIs except the non-deadly, non-problem causing and non-wart causing strains of HPV that are commonly passed around that 80+% of the population has or has had?

It's not such a simple job I have now, is it.

Is this already included in DMSI, or in the plans. I remember reading something in SM that has STI related rejection.

I do remember, going though school they show you all the pictures of STIs to get you to fear the. It does deafeningly works on some people. I personally trust in condoms, but there is a slight part that still fears STIs.

This fear could stop some people from achieving the goal of DMSI.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 04:53 PM)yeah! Wrote: I have two questions related to AP code.

I bought a copy of AOSI on opening day to use with AM. I used it according to directions, not within 4 hours of using another 5g sub and 2 loops.

That night I experienced the worst resistance I can remember. Meltdown. I wrote to the shop requesting either refund or store credit but both were not accepted. I then thought I would give it to someone I know well.

I believe that the first mention of it not being available for refund as it is experimental was made on DMSI 2.1 because I noticed it to be different. I understand that I would not be technically elligable under normal cirumstances due to refund policy.

If I gave this to someone I know well after using for 2 loops would this trigger AP code?


It would not be elligible for a refund regardless because it was not used according to the directions.

Giving it away and erasing all of the copies you had, will not trigger it. But, you now have to have them give it back (and delete all copies), or re-purchase it, to use it.


Quote:The other thing is I have all the subs for my family on my hard drive in a sub folder. I am like the keeper of records and sub advisor and all purchases are made through my account. I know how many copies and whos copies they are. For example I have 4 copies of E2 and they are for my sons and my mother and I but if my partner was ever to run it I would need to buy another copy.

Is this scenario acceptable or should I find another way to do things?

Regards.

If anyone uses a copy of a sub, directly uses and not incidentally is exposed to, that they did not purchase or otherwise legally own, they are breaking copyright law as far as I know.

But you all choosing to store your legal copies on a single computer is not illegal in the slightest.

All I'm asking is that you follow your local copyright laws.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 05:30 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 05:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 08:16 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 07:37 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,

I think you posted something about automatic detection and rejection of those with STIs but you were wondering about how to prevent rejecting those that might have HPV that didn't cause warts.

"Automatically detect, avoid, and reject sexual opportunities with those who have a contagious disease or transmittable organism that would negatively impact the health, well-being, appearance, or body of the user"

Dang, that's harsh - if a person has the common cold, no sex? HuhWink

Exactly. How do I exclude all STIs except the non-deadly, non-problem causing and non-wart causing strains of HPV that are commonly passed around that 80+% of the population has or has had?

It's not such a simple job I have now, is it.

Is this already included in DMSI, or in the plans. I remember reading something in SM that has STI related rejection.

I do remember, going though school they show you all the pictures of STIs to get you to fear the. It does deafeningly works on some people. I personally trust in condoms, but there is a slight part that still fears STIs.

This fear could stop some people from achieving the goal of DMSI.

This is one of the things I did not have time to add to 3.0.1. It will be in 3.1


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-30-2016

Hi Shannon,

I see V3.0.1-A is uploading? Wonderful, we will have it soon, very exciting.

I'm thinking of getting Stop Smoking for a friend who needs to quit and wants to badly. But, I had to ask, I remember you saying that program needs to be rebuild and you seemed to be unsatisfied with it. Is that accurate? Is it working well or are you feeling it needs work still?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 06:01 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon,

I see V3.0.1-A is uploading? Wonderful, we will have it soon, very exciting.

I'm thinking of getting Stop Smoking for a friend who needs to quit and wants to badly. But, I had to ask, I remember you saying that program needs to be rebuild and you seemed to be unsatisfied with it. Is that accurate? Is it working well or are you feeling it needs work still?

Stop Smoking is currently in a single stage format. Originally it was a six stage format.

Six stage format worked because it stepped you up gradually. But nobody wanted to buy it because it was $500 a copy.

When I rebuilt it, it was a single stage, for $89.95, but trying to do all that at once isn't working anywhere near as well as before.

Anything is better than nothing, especially if they use it 6 months straight. It still works for some. But it's better in 6 stage format. That's what I have to re-build. That and the latest technological wizardry.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-30-2016

I hope I can run V3.0.01A tmw or earlier c:


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 06:47 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: I hope I can run V3.0.01A tmw or earlier c:

You're welcome to run it yesterday, but earlier than that is out of the question. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 11-30-2016

Well that's far too unfortunate. Is tomorrow at least certain, or is it likely to be this Friday?