Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 02:34 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:19 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:14 PM)Shannon Wrote: Then it would fail, because turning everything to gold literally counters the agreed upon mass illusion we all have created, and one mind against the collective is not going to change the rules of the game.

This is fascinating.

How does DMSI work around (or with) this "fact"?

DMSI uses the rules of the game you don't know about, and uses the ones you did know about in ways that you didn't know were allowed... Smile
And what you're like me and oblivious to the rules of the game and/or tend to ignore them?

Oh, people like you are welcome to stand in the corner and bang your head against the wall all you want. Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 02:43 PM)Illumi Wrote: So i would like to report something regarding DMSI, the day i went after that hot 10 in the party, there was another girl that i danced with and had a few interactions with at the party. She is now showing up everywhere i go as if she is only now being regestred as a manifestation. Its not in my place to say but it seems that V2.5 replaces and adds to the list of manifestations with the ones being sniped.
One of the girls that was sniped is now in a relationship, and its like she just dissapeared from my radar as opposed to when she was single.

So i take it the girls that show up wherever i go are being sniped and are at thier most ready state, to be approached. If left alone the best they could do is start a conversation.

Edit: Ill try to get that new girl from the party into somewhere private or ask her to hangout, ill see how she responds. If my theory is correct then she is as ready as she could be.

What i WONT do is try to impress her, ill just assume that she is dtf.

The sniper is sensitive to a lot of factors, and one of those is whether or not you care what her current relationship status is. If she is single when you first snipe her, but not the next time you see her, and that lowers your attraction and interest... then your lessened interest reduces the sniper effect.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 02:44 PM)RisingSon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:35 PM)Nemanja Wrote:
Quote:Yeah, women dig murderers big time. They send tons of love letters and marriage proposals to inmates on death row.

When a girl blushes, I take that in a good way. By saying killer, she meant an intense look, and not specifically a killer as in a serial murderer.

But I see you have your humor with you - that's a good thing Wink

I wasn't being humorous, just stating a fact. Why would otherwise losers stuck in prison get that much attention from female admirers? It's a deep mystery to ponder on the female condition. Now I'll have to work on my "I'm going to kill you like my last gf" stare. Tongue

You are of course assuming that all women have the mental and emotional disorders that lead to a few of them doing things like that...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 03:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:34 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:19 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:14 PM)Shannon Wrote: Then it would fail, because turning everything to gold literally counters the agreed upon mass illusion we all have created, and one mind against the collective is not going to change the rules of the game.

This is fascinating.

How does DMSI work around (or with) this "fact"?

DMSI uses the rules of the game you don't know about, and uses the ones you did know about in ways that you didn't know were allowed... Smile
And what you're like me and oblivious to the rules of the game and/or tend to ignore them?

Oh, people like you are welcome to stand in the corner and bang your head against the wall all you want. Big Grin

I'm serious. What can I do to learn these rules that I'm oblivious to? When " idgaf" doesn't work because it disregards the need for playing the game, I can't help but be stuck.

I'm not intentionally trying to f*ck up. Contrary to popular belief.

Seems like "normal" people assume I'm just refusing to do what is obvious, but I have no idea what I'm supposed to do. So it's either "dgaf" and be autistic, or actually figure out what I'm missing. But no one seems to be able to explain what exactly it is that I'm missing.

Like I said "f*cked".


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 03:08 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:44 PM)RisingSon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:35 PM)Nemanja Wrote:
Quote:Yeah, women dig murderers big time. They send tons of love letters and marriage proposals to inmates on death row.

When a girl blushes, I take that in a good way. By saying killer, she meant an intense look, and not specifically a killer as in a serial murderer.

But I see you have your humor with you - that's a good thing Wink

I wasn't being humorous, just stating a fact. Why would otherwise losers stuck in prison get that much attention from female admirers? It's a deep mystery to ponder on the female condition. Now I'll have to work on my "I'm going to kill you like my last gf" stare. Tongue

You are of course assuming that all women have the mental and emotional disorders that lead to a few of them doing things like that...

I think it's a dominance thing and it just plain works. Maybe it is damaged women or dare I say inherent twisted female nature.
I also remember reading somewhere that in tribal societies (think Amazon) the men who had killed other men for whatever reason had more wives.
Eh, but who cares about those savages. Right? Shannon, why do you turn me away from the dark side?.. Why is always rainbows with you?

Although, remember, what matters is results. Those men got results!

Second thought: Let's put a "i'm damaged, fix me" vibe into DMSI which would def get results from the hottest of hotties! Heh... Maybe not.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 03:21 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 03:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:34 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:19 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: This is fascinating.

How does DMSI work around (or with) this "fact"?

DMSI uses the rules of the game you don't know about, and uses the ones you did know about in ways that you didn't know were allowed... Smile
And what you're like me and oblivious to the rules of the game and/or tend to ignore them?

Oh, people like you are welcome to stand in the corner and bang your head against the wall all you want. Big Grin

I'm serious. What can I do to learn these rules that I'm oblivious to? When " idgaf" doesn't work because it disregards the need for playing the game, I can't help but be stuck.

I'm not intentionally trying to f*ck up. Contrary to popular belief.

Seems like "normal" people assume I'm just refusing to do what is obvious, but I have no idea what I'm supposed to do. So it's either "dgaf" and be autistic, or actually figure out what I'm missing. But no one seems to be able to explain what exactly it is that I'm missing.

Like I said "f*cked".

I feel the same. I never really understood the dating process. And I managed to fuck up an encounter with a girl who was practically serving it on a silver platter.

Edit: is it that we are thinking about it in a logical standpoint when it's something different?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 03:25 PM)Aventus45 Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 03:21 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 03:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:34 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:28 PM)Shannon Wrote: DMSI uses the rules of the game you don't know about, and uses the ones you did know about in ways that you didn't know were allowed... Smile
And what you're like me and oblivious to the rules of the game and/or tend to ignore them?

Oh, people like you are welcome to stand in the corner and bang your head against the wall all you want. Big Grin

I'm serious. What can I do to learn these rules that I'm oblivious to? When " idgaf" doesn't work because it disregards the need for playing the game, I can't help but be stuck.

I'm not intentionally trying to f*ck up. Contrary to popular belief.

Seems like "normal" people assume I'm just refusing to do what is obvious, but I have no idea what I'm supposed to do. So it's either "dgaf" and be autistic, or actually figure out what I'm missing. But no one seems to be able to explain what exactly it is that I'm missing.

Like I said "f*cked".

I feel the same. I never really understood the dating process. And I managed to **** up an encounter with a girl who was practically serving it on a silver platter.

Edit: is it that we are thinking about it in a logical standpoint when it's something different?

I feel your pain man. I've done this all my life, no matter what I try. And I've tried a lot of stuff. Currently I'm out of ideas of what to try.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 03:21 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 03:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:34 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:19 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: This is fascinating.

How does DMSI work around (or with) this "fact"?

DMSI uses the rules of the game you don't know about, and uses the ones you did know about in ways that you didn't know were allowed... Smile
And what you're like me and oblivious to the rules of the game and/or tend to ignore them?

Oh, people like you are welcome to stand in the corner and bang your head against the wall all you want. Big Grin

I'm serious. What can I do to learn these rules that I'm oblivious to? When " idgaf" doesn't work because it disregards the need for playing the game, I can't help but be stuck.

I'm not intentionally trying to f*ck up. Contrary to popular belief.

Seems like "normal" people assume I'm just refusing to do what is obvious, but I have no idea what I'm supposed to do. So it's either "dgaf" and be autistic, or actually figure out what I'm missing. But no one seems to be able to explain what exactly it is that I'm missing.

Like I said "f*cked".

The first rule is, you as a human being cannot force the whole world to operate the way you want it to. No matter what you do, how much you want it, or who you are.

That is the rule you refuse to follow. You do seem to be making strides in the right direction, though.

You can change certain things through various means, but not the whole thing. That means you have to go with the flow sometimes. Work with "what is", instead of trying to change it. The key is knowing when you can change something, and when you cannot. It's not always easy to learn, or teach that stuff. I've tried to help, but we don't seem to communicate well enough for me to put it in words that you understand. Maybe that is not an accident.

Some rules you are meant to be aware of, and some you are not. For those you are not supposed to be aware of, you have to rely on your deep subconscious, higher self or whatever you want to call it, to help you out. Which I'm doing through subs.

Beyond that, it's the grindstone of life. That's why they say youth is wasted on the young: they don't know what they've got, because they haven't had the experience to understand yet.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 11-22-2016

I am sooo excited that natural seduction is being added! And it focuses on ANYONE the user finds attractive!! Yeah! Thank you Shannon! Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 03:22 PM)RisingSon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 03:08 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:44 PM)RisingSon Wrote:
(11-22-2016, 02:35 PM)Nemanja Wrote:
Quote:Yeah, women dig murderers big time. They send tons of love letters and marriage proposals to inmates on death row.

When a girl blushes, I take that in a good way. By saying killer, she meant an intense look, and not specifically a killer as in a serial murderer.

But I see you have your humor with you - that's a good thing Wink

I wasn't being humorous, just stating a fact. Why would otherwise losers stuck in prison get that much attention from female admirers? It's a deep mystery to ponder on the female condition. Now I'll have to work on my "I'm going to kill you like my last gf" stare. Tongue

You are of course assuming that all women have the mental and emotional disorders that lead to a few of them doing things like that...

I think it's a dominance thing and it just plain works. Maybe it is damaged women or dare I say inherent twisted female nature.
I also remember reading somewhere that in tribal societies (think Amazon) the men who had killed other men for whatever reason had more wives.
Eh, but who cares about those savages. Right? Shannon, why do you turn me away from the dark side?.. Why is always rainbows with you?

Although, remember, what matters is results. Those men got results!

Second thought: Let's put a "i'm damaged, fix me" vibe into DMSI which would def get results from the hottest of hotties! Heh...

I know that no woman responds favorably to a murderer she knows is a murderer unless she is deeply broken, or the murderer is a murderer by virtue of the fact that they killed someone to protect her and/or her child or family.

It is apparent to me that your level of understanding of WHY things are so is not high enough to really make my point. You're cherry picking what you want to see and then interpreting it the way you want to, and in an overly simplistic way. This leads to serious misconceptions and misperceptions, which result in very narrow thinking and tunnel vision. You then seek to emulate the damaged and damage yourself instead of do things that will make you truly happy and healthy. All the while saying I'm delusional, because I can see more than just "Pussy! They got pussy! More pussy!"

It's not about rainbows. It's about seeing the bigger picture and knowing WHY those things are true. And understanding that mentally and emotionally damaged and unhealthy women are not valuable, even if they are easy pussy.

It's a damned good thing for the lot of you that I do understand these things.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 03:32 PM)maxx55 Wrote: I am sooo excited that natural seduction is being added! And it focuses on ANYONE the user finds attractive!! Yeah! Thank you Shannon! Big Grin

I told you, I am not averse to adding it, if I can find a way to make it enhance instead of contradict, which I believe I have.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 03:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: The first rule is, you as a human being cannot force the whole world to operate the way you want it to. No matter what you do, how much you want it, or who you are.

That is the rule you refuse to follow. You do seem to be making strides in the right direction, though.

I don't know how the world works, if I did, I wouldn't be having this problem.

And how do you know I'm making strides in the right direction? You must be seeing something I'm not, you must also know what the right direction is, in which case why don't you just tell me or write a book or something?


(11-22-2016, 03:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: You can change certain things through various means, but not the whole thing. That means you have to go with the flow sometimes. Work with "what is", instead of trying to change it. The key is knowing when you can change something, and when you cannot. It's not always easy to learn, or teach that stuff. I've tried to help, but we don't seem to communicate well enough for me to put it in words that you understand. Maybe that is not an accident.

Here's the problem: "What is"... what is that? What really IS what is...

That's so vague it could mean a million things. That's why I don't understand. I need specific examples of things that "are" or "what is" and the contrast to "what is not".

(11-22-2016, 03:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: Some rules you are meant to be aware of, and some you are not. For those you are not supposed to be aware of, you have to rely on your deep subconscious, higher self or whatever you want to call it, to help you out. Which I'm doing through subs.

Beyond that, it's the grindstone of life. That's why they say youth is wasted on the young: they don't know what they've got, because they haven't had the experience to understand yet.


I think autism is a little different than just failing to learn "what is". Just saying.

I don't want to put limiting beliefs on myself, but with all the knowledge and experience I have, you'd think if I didn't have some defect of the mind I'd have figured this out already.

What I need is examples of the "what is" stuff.

If you really want to help, just point it out.

I made a post about a girl in the library today, if you really want to help, explain what happened, because I can't. The girl literally did a 180 on me while I was interacting normal, with no neediness, nothing that I can see was wrong, yet her sudden repulsion and "snap" in behavior indicates I did do something, or did not do something, and I need to find out lest I keep doing this over and over and over to infinity.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-22-2016

So for NS in DMSI is it designed to get us to respond in the way that affects the sniped person? Or is it supposed to be a mix of the users natural way of seduction and the way she is the most receptive?

Edit: I would think the latter would make it more of a natural transition and effective.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-22-2016

(11-22-2016, 03:22 PM)RisingSon Wrote: Second thought: Let's put a "i'm damaged, fix me" vibe into DMSI which would def get results from the hottest of hotties! Heh... Maybe not.

Holy shit, that would be AWESOME, especially if the damage included social retardation. Big Grin

Then, as she makes the guy her pet project, she proceeds to fulfill his every sexual fantasy. :o