(11-19-2016, 05:35 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:

(11-19-2016, 04:44 PM)ImFreeman Wrote:

(11-19-2016, 04:16 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned.

There are several users here who have not developed basic flirting skills. For them (and i consider myself included) it would be very beneficial.

Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department

If a situation presents itself were to take advantage of it the user needs to take some charge and make at least a little bit 'happen' then NSFM will be useful.


It contradicts the goal? maybe the goal needs to be refocused. IMHO the goal is sex abundance with high value partners. We should strive to reach it and not be 'anal' about the way we reach it

Couldn't have said it any better. In the end, we can all agree we want sexual abundance. Whatever it takes to get there, let's be more flexible about it. If NSFM helps us get there faster, Shannon will decide in his experimentations. If not, so be it.

People are so obsessed with the idea of women having to all the work (the entire approach to seduction thing), that they're being so narrow-minded regarding the addition of things like NSFM, that could potentially assist us. Remember guys, sex is a two-way effort.

If NFSM doesn't get added to 3.0.1, I would even consider switching to it for a month or so, to enhance my flirting and seduction skills (I don't know when, but some time down the track).

(11-19-2016, 04:44 PM)ImFreeman Wrote: [quote='RTBoss' pid='142865' dateline='1479600997']

Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department

(11-19-2016, 04:44 PM)ImFreeman Wrote:

(11-19-2016, 04:16 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned.

There are several users here who have not developed basic flirting skills. For them (and i consider myself included) it would be very beneficial.

Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department

If a situation presents itself were to take advantage of it the user needs to take some charge and make at least a little bit 'happen' then NSFM will be useful.


It contradicts the goal? maybe the goal needs to be refocused. IMHO the goal is sex abundance with high value partners. We should strive to reach it and not be 'anal' about the way we reach it

(11-19-2016, 07:13 PM)RTBoss Wrote:

(11-19-2016, 04:44 PM)ImFreeman Wrote: [quote='RTBoss' pid='142865' dateline='1479600997']

Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department

Let's be fair. You forgot the part where I was seduced by both women, and the only help I had was the alcohol they fed me. I didn't have to do a thing, and I didn't have NSFM.

Anyway, I get your point. I understand the theory behind what you guys are saying. All I'm saying is, let's trust in the opinion and knowledge of the guy who writes and innovates every program we use. It's not like he didn't consider all of the angles of the request and then cross-check it with the script - a script that says things and works in ways only he knows. If he can make it work synergistically, great.

(11-19-2016, 08:02 PM)Duke.Togo Wrote: Well RT, can you blame the two women for wanting to bang you with a face like yours.

(11-19-2016, 07:13 PM)RTBoss Wrote:

(11-19-2016, 04:44 PM)ImFreeman Wrote: [quote='RTBoss' pid='142865' dateline='1479600997']

Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department

Let's be fair. You forgot the part where I was seduced by both women, and the only help I had was the alcohol they fed me. I didn't have to do a thing, and I didn't have NSFM.

Anyway, I get your point. I understand the theory behind what you guys are saying. All I'm saying is, let's trust in the opinion and knowledge of the guy who writes and innovates every program we use. It's not like he didn't consider all of the angles of the request and then cross-check it with the script - a script that says things and works in ways only he knows. If he can make it work synergistically, great.

(11-20-2016, 12:19 AM)Benjamin Wrote: Shannon, what's the difference with the hybrid format? I don't really get it. And are they recommended not for use with headphones just like normal ultrasonic?

(11-20-2016, 12:31 AM)Shannon Wrote: Hybrid format is the ultrasonic format and one of the masked formats in one track. It allows me to effectively double the data input by using different pitch and volume channels. Since it uses ultrasonic and masked, you can use it with headphones because you can hear it. However, you'll want to be careful regardless.

(11-20-2016, 12:39 AM)heavysm Wrote:

(11-20-2016, 12:31 AM)Shannon Wrote: Hybrid format is the ultrasonic format and one of the masked formats in one track. It allows me to effectively double the data input by using different pitch and volume channels. Since it uses ultrasonic and masked, you can use it with headphones because you can hear it. However, you'll want to be careful regardless.

Is the hybrid format an experiment for now or will it be included for all subs going forward? (sounds amazing, btw)