+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - swisston - 11-19-2016
Interesting. I had thought that DMSI 3.01 was going to be the first 6g sub. Does that mean that there will be a version 4 using full 6g quite soon after (6g development seems to be nearing completion?)?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AriGold - 11-19-2016
Shannon, why don't you split your journal into subliminal and perfume entries?
Or make another sticky with "Shannon's Perfume Journal"?
I also like the idea of increasing the romantic titles in 5G or 5.5G.
But a program that I'd really love to see is the positive ultra success that you planned for your gf. Including luck magnifier, winner's mindset, everything is possible and seek the challenge seems to be to be a real source of success. Seek the challenge makes you seek out more and more opportunities to grow bigger and winner's mindset gets you the attitude to win everything that you start. It is a cycle to success. A way to the next level. Do it in 5.5G and I will try to be the first buyer.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 11-19-2016
What is P5 again? I can't seem to find where Shannon mentioned it.
Edit: how trippy would it be if the models say the best amount of loops is 1?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dr. Strangelove - 11-19-2016
A question on POSE and X series subs: I wonder if, further to producing arousal, these X series subs are made to drop sexual inhibitions. By these I mean, things that affected partner would normally be reluctant to do, because “they don’t do that sort of thing”. Stuff that should be mandatory, but “good girls” don’t do.
Also I wonder if there is something in this effect in DMSI or SM, and instruction for the other person to drop their sexual inhibitions to please the user in any way he wants.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dmitry - 11-19-2016
Is DMSI V3.0.1 be a free upgrade for DMSI 2.5 users or full price?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 11-19-2016
Shannon,
November 21 2016 is almost here.
I had some ideas for DMSI v3.0.1 and I know some of this might seem nonsensical or illogical, but so are sexual decisions. So to me, it seems to fit right in.
1) The responders miss the user even if they haven't met the user
2) The responders are searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know what they're looking for or what they're wanting
3) The longer they go with out sex with the user, the more the responders want to have sex with the user.
4) They wonder where the user is and what the user is doing.
5) They look at their phone and wonder what's taking the user so long to contact them.
6) They plan things they want to sexually do with the user.
7) Their minds keep defaulting back to thoughts of the user.
8) They feel warm when they think of the user or when something reminds them of the user.
9) They put the user in all their sexual fantasies
10) They substitute the user in all their pleasant sexual memories in place of the people they had sex with because they wish the user was the only sexual partner they ever had.
11) Every orgasm they have with the user is even more intense and longer lasting than the previous one.
12) Each orgasm they have with the user is easier to achieve than the previous one.
13) They can easily be on the cusp of orgasm (edging) for extended periods of time when they have sex with the user
14) When they masturbate, the most satisfying and fulfilling feelings and orgasms are those that include the user.
15) (I don't know how to best phrase this) The responders effectively deal with (nullify, assuage, etc.) all potential social and emotional barriers to having sex with the user, such as worries about what her friends think, fear of her reputation being sullied, fear of losing status, fears of being judged, inconsistent follow through, forgetfulness, life chaos, her work schedule, lack of motivation on her part, worries that she's not pretty enough, fear of rejection, etc. and they do so in such a way that it results in actual physical sex with the responders and the user.
16) The responders are actively searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know the user
17) The responders have a feeling of destiny regarding the user and having sex with the user repeatedly
18) The responders have the "where have you been for all of my (sex) life" feeling about the user
19) The responders feel like everything they know and everything they have experienced points directly at having sex with the user repeatedly, like everything in their life has been leading up to it
20) The responders feel like having sex with the user is the most liberating experience ever and that it re-enforces their sense of independence and self-acceptance.
21) The responders crave the experience of feeling surrendered to the user, and actively seek it out and facilitate it.
22) The responders feel grateful about having sex with the user.
23) The responders can't imagine better sex than the sex with the user
24) The user fulfills and satisfies sexual needs, wants, and desires that the responders didn't even know they had and/or didn't even imagine were possible.
25) The responders desire sex with the user and only the user. All else just feel like second best.
I'm sure you could word them much better, but the concepts are there.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 08:20 AM)Dmitry Wrote: Is DMSI V3.0.1 be a free upgrade for DMSI 2.5 users or full price?
All versions until final (working) release are free.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-19-2016
Hello Shannon!
I was just wondering, I know you said the emotional shielding from E2 *IS* going into V3.0.1. I remember recommending putting in Remove Negativity Within 4G awhile ago which I feel would be a massive help to DMSI. You said after that, that you were putting in PTPA 4G.
I was just wondering, have you put in, or are still in the process of putting in, PTPA 4G into V3.0.1?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 01:50 AM)swisston Wrote: Interesting. I had thought that DMSI 3.01 was going to be the first 6g sub. Does that mean that there will be a version 4 using full 6g quite soon after (6g development seems to be nearing completion?)?
This was what i thought too. And i also heard something about an end of November release as well which exploded my curiosity for 6G.
I'm still in the patiently waiting camp for BASE 6G. Maybe next year around this time *fingers crossed*
But since 6G is a bit more refined now, though incomplete, I'm wondering how close 5.5G has come to 6G now. Is it 66% as effective as 6G? 75%?
I'm guessing (anticipating Shannon's response) that we can't know because 6G isn't finished yet, and we can't quantify what we have against something that isn't complete yet.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 11-19-2016
I have a question Shannon.
With DMSI, if you happen to cross paths with a girl that's a manifestation, and don't interact with her then, will you cross paths again because she's a manifestation? Or are the DMSI manifestations each one-time only (which I wouldn't like)?
Thanks
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 01:50 AM)swisston Wrote: Interesting. I had thought that DMSI 3.01 was going to be the first 6g sub. Does that mean that there will be a version 4 using full 6g quite soon after (6g development seems to be nearing completion?)?
You thought wrong. We are far from the first 6G sub. There is a lot more to add, a lot more to "mine" from the current 6G prototype, and the development of the 6G prototype is - as far as I know - probably a few versions away from finished. So there is a LOT left to do before 6G shows up.
I can't wok on 6G dev while I am building subs. And right now, I am building MIR/GPR/MHS/DMSI and if the mail ever goes through, I may still have that custom contract.
MIR/GPR/MHS are rated critically important right now.
6G will come out after DMSI achieves final status, most likely.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 02:58 AM)AriGold Wrote: Shannon, why don't you split your journal into subliminal and perfume entries?
Or make another sticky with "Shannon's Perfume Journal"?
Maybe I'll do that.
Quote:I also like the idea of increasing the romantic titles in 5G or 5.5G.
But a program that I'd really love to see is the positive ultra success that you planned for your gf. Including luck magnifier, winner's mindset, everything is possible and seek the challenge seems to be to be a real source of success. Seek the challenge makes you seek out more and more opportunities to grow bigger and winner's mindset gets you the attitude to win everything that you start. It is a cycle to success. A way to the next level. Do it in 5.5G and I will try to be the first buyer.
Throw another one in queue. I'm working as fast as I can right now, but still falling behind for various reasons.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 05:17 AM)Aventus45 Wrote: What is P5 again? I can't seem to find where Shannon mentioned it.
Edit: how trippy would it be if the models say the best amount of loops is 1?
P3 maxes out the word count.
P4 optimizes P3 and puts the word count where it is most effective.
P5 acts as a way to increase and improve the effects of P3 and P4.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-19-2016
(11-19-2016, 06:25 AM)Barba Wrote: A question on POSE and X series subs: I wonder if, further to producing arousal, these X series subs are made to drop sexual inhibitions. By these I mean, things that affected partner would normally be reluctant to do, because “they don’t do that sort of thing”. Stuff that should be mandatory, but “good girls” don’t do.
They are made to lower sexual inhibitions, except for X124, POSE V1 and V3. However, the technology they use is really old now and not powerful enough to fully achieve that goal.
Also I wonder if there is something in this effect in DMSI or SM, and instruction for the other person to drop their sexual inhibitions to please the user in any way he wants.
[/quote]
DMSI has a disinhibitor, but not SM. The disinhibitor is not paired with specific instructions to "please the user in any way he wants" though.