(11-17-2016, 04:01 AM)posh Wrote: shannon you need to explain what you mean when u say ur working on different modules. none of us know what things like "Currently working on AUTBFS module for MIR/DMSI." even mean. If would be helpful if u explained what the modules were for.

thanks

(11-17-2016, 12:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 04:01 AM)posh Wrote: shannon you need to explain what you mean when u say ur working on different modules. none of us know what things like "Currently working on AUTBFS module for MIR/DMSI." even mean. If would be helpful if u explained what the modules were for.

thanks

As has been stated since this post, by someone else, a lot of the modules are information I need to keep secret. I am not going to sped literally decades of time and research and effort and money and experiments and then give away to my competitors (and create countless new ones!) everything I learn.

On top of that, just because a person reads the description I may give, does not mean they would necessarily understand it or understand it correctly. Without seeing the script, they could really have no true understanding of what I mean.

That is in large part because the knowledge required to discover and develop and create these new technologies is advanced and complex to say the very least, and without that background, it would again be easy to misunderstand and make mistakes that could cost someone dearly.

Finally, the nature of how the subconscious operates and communicates is such that translating between the conscious and subconscious requires not just a huge amount of knowledge and experience, but a rather ridiculous amount of care in getting the phrasing and grammar exactly correct for achieving the desired goal.

So given all this, I cannot and will not be releasing the majority of what these modules actually do. I'd like to, but it's not safe for me or you. And so I tell you guys what I ca, which is the name of the module and when I have done what with it.

(11-17-2016, 12:32 PM)Alpha360 Wrote: yeah maybe something like fear but in Shannon's early journal he tells the story of him being really really shy and even with that shyness the manifestation worked, like something was meant to happen which "forced" him to take action with the girl or something like that.

(11-17-2016, 04:25 AM)Dmitry Wrote: Shannon, I saw that some scripts (open library) contain wording "reject". In Russian language "rejection" is quite a synonym for "suppress", "something I don't want to see". Rejection, as suppresion is considered one of the most causes of deseases and, per se, cancer. I don't want to seed the panic just want to clarify: "distancing", "disidentification" are more propriate? In my consulting practice people are starting resolve and heal there issues by "looking at something as it is", "giving it a space to be" and training themselves to see the truth of the cause in its wholeness, then distancing and disidentify with "issues" and then healing process automatically takes place. "What we reject are becoming our destiny" free wording of Carl G. Jung sentence.
Can you explain or comment that?

(11-17-2016, 12:37 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: How many days should I take a break from E2 in anticipation for V3.0.1?

(11-17-2016, 06:40 AM)robstar Wrote: Shannon I think another sub that would potentially help you become a multimillionaire would be a "Be free from all addictions" sub. It would've best for it to not force the user to never do or take the addictive element again, because most people don't like the idea that they don't have a choice, but rather gets the user free of the addictive component, destroying the addict mind so to speak so the user is free to do or not do what they choose.

(11-17-2016, 06:52 AM)Dmitry Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:40 AM)robstar Wrote: Shannon I think another sub that would potentially help you become a multimillionaire would be a "Be free from all addictions" sub. It would've best for it to not force the user to never do or take the addictive element again, because most people don't like the idea that they don't have a choice, but rather gets the user free of the addictive component, destroying the addict mind so to speak so the user is free to do or not do what they choose.

If unconscious causes (secondary gains) to take addicts material are solved/healed, then there are no reasons to continue the use of drugs and etc.
Don't consider the unconscious stupid: if drugs are "giving" something to user, that cannot be obtained via "normal" ways, the person will continue the addictive behavior.

(11-17-2016, 10:17 AM)Ricardo Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 12:12 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(11-16-2016, 06:25 PM)K-Train Wrote: Shannon the fellas and I have been responding to this thread here, here, and here. Note: those are my posts but they also encompass the ideas laid forth by others in the thread. RTBoss, Alpha360, Ricardo, and Maxx contributed as well. Just throwing that out there. All links are in chronological order.

I'll shorthand the idea here though. Basically, we are discussing dropping the "perfect" from the AYP series in favor of something quicker. Attract an Amazing/Attractive Lover (AAL for short). This series would be the equivalent of fast food.

I remember you told me that with the AYPs there were three options: 1)Good, 2) Fast, and 3) Cheap. We could only get 2 out of the 3. We're choosing options 2 and 3 here. If you don't have time to read every post, the very last link will sum everything up. Thanks Shannon.

You will have to wait a while, because I am planning to rebuild the AYP series using current technology, and I expect based on the experiments that I have done, and what I have seen it do under even adverse test conditions in DMSI, that time will no longer be an issue.

To clarify perfect, though, let's consider "perfect lover".

Such a person would very likely or certainly be:

* The most physically attractive you believe you can get at the time, subconsciously.
* Maximally compatible with you sexually.
* Sexually available.
* Of legal age of sexual consent

Such a person may or may not not be:

* Sane
* Geographically close
* Mature
* Healthy emotionally
* Sober/Clean
* Single or otherwise un-involved
* Capable of romance
* Without children

The perfect part applies only to the descriptive of what the focus is, in this case "lover". Nothing else.

Doing what you suggest will lower the standards further, and widen the pool of available candidates, making it easier and faster to do and producing more candidates. However, we don't know if the new technology will make the AYP series perform the way we want yet. I am going to see if I can make it do what us desired before I lower the standards.

Time may not be the issue going forward but whether the 'perfect' person actually exist in the first place is still the Achilles heel as far as I can see.

(11-17-2016, 11:33 AM)Happylife01 Wrote: can someone please explain whats does the snipper thing in DMSI do? also is 3 loops back to back important???

(11-17-2016, 02:29 PM)Sickologist Wrote: Men will get in your face when they perceive you as a threat or better than them. It happens in different ways, in your situation it was aggression because you had no back up and were outnumbered. I'd just call it out as it was and beat them at their own game. The guy who was playing rough, give him a hard ass tackle from behind. The guy who got in your face "yeah, keep moaning little bitch". So yeah, DMSI is making them insecure, and it's on you to not get knocked off the pedestal. In a twisted way they were complimenting you.