Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 04:18 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 04:01 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 03:56 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 03:50 PM)2Cozy Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 03:05 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Limitations, hunh?

This coming from the guy that thinks you're "giving away your male power" if you say hello to a woman in public.

1st of all, I'm pretty sure I have more balls then you in that area. I've pushed things things and made things happen that are way beyond what's socially acceptable.

2nd of all I can tell you from experience that as soon as you pursue a girl, you lose power to her, whether you know it or not. There are a lot better ways for things to happen trust me.

lol.
ok.



yarrrgh matey's, these be treacherous waters. The blimey AMOGs are afoot and they be hankerin' for trouble!!!!

As much as I agree with you chaos, there is indeed something to what he's saying. Unless I'm more socially retarded than I realize, any time I've gone and tried to make something happen with a girl after she has shown interest she has lost interest instantly.

Like I said, there's something to it. It's like there's a certain way to respond to women. I dunno anything beyond that.

No. There isn't.

There's a vast difference between pursuing a woman -- as in chasing (and thus treating her as the prize) -- and approaching a woman to talk to her.

4Kingdoms keeps asking why I have such success with DMSI in the past. The answer is simple: I approach, I tell them I want them and voila! The times that I have been passive (like with #3), I ended up losing the woman, because passivity is NOT natural for men.

You can walk around with as much charged hate as you want, and very few women will approach and talk to you unless you're famous or you're built like a Greek god. That's the natural order of things.

As a man, you're the expansive force, the force that hunts, the force that penetrates. She's the passive receiver. Look at the sex act itself: You penetrate. You **** her senseless until she can do nothing but babble. You care only about your own pleasure, and she derives her pleasure from you getting off!

In the natural state of things, no matter what the SJWs say, no matter what the AMOGs say, no matter what the zen masters say -- she will NEVER actively hunt and pursue a man.

Hence, why DMSI is such a big deal. It actually bends natural law (without breaking it, hence one of the reasons Shannon probably shies away from a conscious sniper module -- you'd be interfering with will). This even applies in the animal world, where the female will present herself to the male (IOIs) and the male must still make the approach and claim her as his own.

In primal days, the man would approach the woman and bonk her over the head with a rock, then take her away for the fuckin'. But still, the masculine essence is the agent that impresses his will upon a person.

Whether it's fair or not, whether we like it or not, this the way the universe operates. It's constantly moving toward perfection, and it doesn't give a **** about how the individual person feels about it. These processes want the strong to survive, thrive and procreate and the weak to die off. Sitting on your laurels, claiming to be alpha because you're doing NOTHING is insane.

*Sigh* I really didn't want things to go in this direction, but my experience in my life must be honored.

First of all, like I said (Which you didn't even address):

"any time I've gone and tried to make something happen with a girl after she has shown interest she has lost interest instantly."

So I don't know what's going on in those situations, but obviously the act of "expanding" was more of a turn-off than a turn-on.

Second: I've been approached by women a lot throughout my life. Like a lot (mostly before subs) and I was never very "expansive" or anything that fits what you're talking about, so that again, makes no sense to me.

Third:



/\ That is nature. That is clearly a female seducing a male. Aside from the actual thrusting, EVERYTHING was done by the female.

Like I've said: if monkeys can do it, so can we.

Btw, if I'm not mistaken, that video is a good example of an alpha sitting on his laurels.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016

To be honest, Sarge, it's not really going to go in any "direction" because you've shown a remarkable capacity to misunderstand, misconstrue and downright ignore the essence of what someone's telling you to the point that there's no real benefit for me to spend a significant amount of time explaining things to you.

The human female equivalent of the video you showed is the IOI. What you and 2Cops are advocating is ignoring the signals she's giving to come and approach.

(EDIT: In Gorilla reproduction, ONLY the silverback has the right to procreate. Everyone else must sneak fuck the women.)

You're literally arguing that approaching a woman is "giving away your power," while passively sitting there and letting her CHOOSE OR REJECT YOU is instead empowerment.

That's by far the most ridiculous argument I've seen on this forum yet.

We've had this conversation before: You have your mind made up before entering the conversation. The fact of the matter -- if we want to get technical and logical -- is you are a virgin, and what you've been doing clearly isn't working for you. And yet, instead of truly exploring different avenues, you're continuing to rely on the same exact paradigms that have failed you before.

There's a beautiful quote from "No Country for Old Men," that goes something like this: "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"

So, if ignorance suits you, wear it. Continue to "honor" your limited experience and ignore those who are much more experienced around you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-06-2016

Sarge, 'honoring your experience' and such is going to bring more of your experience and that is of staying a virgin. Posting all kinds of elabourate rationalizations, an actual video about monkeys having sex showing why it must be correct to rationalize your own issues is just bringing more of that.

Your experience so far is of not getting laid and you're arguing very strongly to keep that limitation.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 04:43 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: To be honest, Sarge, it's not really going to go in any "direction" because you've shown a remarkable capacity to misunderstand, misconstrue and downright ignore the essence of what someone's telling you to the point that there's no real benefit for me to spend a significant amount of time explaining things to you.

The human female equivalent of the video you showed is the IOI. What you and 2Cops are advocating is ignoring the signals she's giving to come and approach.

(EDIT: In Gorilla reproduction, ONLY the silverback has the right to procreate. Everyone else must sneak **** the women.)

You're literally arguing that approaching a woman is "giving away your power," while passively sitting there and letting her CHOOSE OR REJECT YOU is instead empowerment.

That's by far the most ridiculous argument I've seen on this forum yet.

We've had this conversation before: You have your mind made up before entering the conversation. The fact of the matter -- if we want to get technical and logical -- is you are a virgin, and what you've been doing clearly isn't working for you. And yet, instead of truly exploring different avenues, you're continuing to rely on the same exact paradigms that have failed you before.

There's a beautiful quote from "No Country for Old Men," that goes something like this: "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"

So, if ignorance suits you, wear it. Continue to "honor" your limited experience and ignore those who are much more experienced around you.

Just because men usually have power doesn't mean women can't and won't take it from you. That's the natural order of things... men have power, women use men's power. Even when a woman shows you interest she's giving up power to you, you think the same doesn't apply to you just because you're a male? Don't make me laugh.

[Edited,Moderator note:No flaming,keep it civil]


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 05:07 PM)2Cozy Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 04:43 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: To be honest, Sarge, it's not really going to go in any "direction" because you've shown a remarkable capacity to misunderstand, misconstrue and downright ignore the essence of what someone's telling you to the point that there's no real benefit for me to spend a significant amount of time explaining things to you.

The human female equivalent of the video you showed is the IOI. What you and 2Cops are advocating is ignoring the signals she's giving to come and approach.

(EDIT: In Gorilla reproduction, ONLY the silverback has the right to procreate. Everyone else must sneak **** the women.)

You're literally arguing that approaching a woman is "giving away your power," while passively sitting there and letting her CHOOSE OR REJECT YOU is instead empowerment.

That's by far the most ridiculous argument I've seen on this forum yet.

We've had this conversation before: You have your mind made up before entering the conversation. The fact of the matter -- if we want to get technical and logical -- is you are a virgin, and what you've been doing clearly isn't working for you. And yet, instead of truly exploring different avenues, you're continuing to rely on the same exact paradigms that have failed you before.

There's a beautiful quote from "No Country for Old Men," that goes something like this: "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"

So, if ignorance suits you, wear it. Continue to "honor" your limited experience and ignore those who are much more experienced around you.

Just because men usually have power doesn't mean women can't and won't take it from you. That's the natural order of things... men have power, women use men's power. Even when a woman shows you interest she's giving up power to you, you think the same doesn't apply to you just because you're a male? Don't make me laugh.

Aren't you the guy who said he was only able to bag drug addicts or something? You don't have too high an opinion of the women you've been with, why should we value your experience?

No. You have me confused with someone else.

My last posted conquests was a doctor and a 9/10 blonde. However, in my travels and adventures around the United States, I've banged drug addicts, hookers, women that I paid afterward even if they didn't ask (because I made them my hooker), virgins of every faith, women pretending to be virgins of every faith, married women, women who may not have been born women, and everything in-between.

But to answer your question, whether or not you "value my experience" is completely your choice. And I couldn't care less which route you walk.

I'm bored. I'm watching "SCREAM: The TV Show," and I'm finding much amusement in ripping apart your rather illogical and simplistic arguments.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 04:43 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: To be honest, Sarge, it's not really going to go in any "direction" because you've shown a remarkable capacity to misunderstand, misconstrue and downright ignore the essence of what someone's telling you to the point that there's no real benefit for me to spend a significant amount of time explaining things to you.

Sarge, you should be honoured that he used so many convoluted words to attack you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 05:22 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 05:07 PM)2Cozy Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 04:43 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: To be honest, Sarge, it's not really going to go in any "direction" because you've shown a remarkable capacity to misunderstand, misconstrue and downright ignore the essence of what someone's telling you to the point that there's no real benefit for me to spend a significant amount of time explaining things to you.

The human female equivalent of the video you showed is the IOI. What you and 2Cops are advocating is ignoring the signals she's giving to come and approach.

(EDIT: In Gorilla reproduction, ONLY the silverback has the right to procreate. Everyone else must sneak **** the women.)

You're literally arguing that approaching a woman is "giving away your power," while passively sitting there and letting her CHOOSE OR REJECT YOU is instead empowerment.

That's by far the most ridiculous argument I've seen on this forum yet.

We've had this conversation before: You have your mind made up before entering the conversation. The fact of the matter -- if we want to get technical and logical -- is you are a virgin, and what you've been doing clearly isn't working for you. And yet, instead of truly exploring different avenues, you're continuing to rely on the same exact paradigms that have failed you before.

There's a beautiful quote from "No Country for Old Men," that goes something like this: "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"

So, if ignorance suits you, wear it. Continue to "honor" your limited experience and ignore those who are much more experienced around you.

Just because men usually have power doesn't mean women can't and won't take it from you. That's the natural order of things... men have power, women use men's power. Even when a woman shows you interest she's giving up power to you, you think the same doesn't apply to you just because you're a male? Don't make me laugh.

Aren't you the guy who said he was only able to bag drug addicts or something? You don't have too high an opinion of the women you've been with, why should we value your experience?

No. You have me confused with someone else.

My last posted conquests was a doctor and a 9/10 blonde. However, in my travels and adventures around the United States, I've banged drug addicts, hookers, women that I paid afterward even if they didn't ask (because I made them my hooker), virgins of every faith, women pretending to be virgins of every faith, married women, women who may not have been born women, and everything in-between.

But to answer your question, whether or not you "value my experience" is completely your choice. And I couldn't care less which route you walk.

I'm bored. I'm watching "SCREAM: The TV Show," and I'm finding much amusement in ripping apart your rather illogical and simplistic arguments.

I must have missed the part in your reply where you "ripped apart my arguments".


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-06-2016

Hey there 2Cozy, I think this convo may go a little better if you explain what your personally definition is of "giving power away"? I've heard it before and in some instances of its use I understood it but I'm not understanding its use here. Thanks.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016

@2Copy --

This is getting needlessly out of hand, and I promised Ben and the Maestro that I was going to stop being one of the troublemakers here.

We're all brothers trying to connect with something greater than ourselves while making that green and getting our dicks wet in the process.

Love you, brother. You too, Sarge.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Roy - 11-06-2016

Rule no.5"Flaming" others, flame wars, and unnecessary rudeness and arguing are prohibited.

Keep this discussion civil and on point.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-06-2016

I don't even know how to respond to all this. But it definitely seems like until I have my d!ck in a pussy I'll constantly be doing things wrong according to the more experienced members here.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 05:34 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: @2Copy --

This is getting needlessly out of hand, and I promised Ben and the Maestro that I was going to stop being one of the troublemakers here.

We're all brothers trying to connect with something greater than ourselves while making that green and getting our dicks wet in the process.

Love you, brother. You too, Sarge.

Well said *slowly claps*


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 11-06-2016

2Cozy, Roy beat me to it but you're getting to the point where it doesn't seem you really have a point with what you're saying and you just want to cause arguments. Let's not let it escalate.

I didn't see Chaos's post as an attack on sarge but pointing out something.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 05:33 PM)K-Train Wrote: Hey there 2Cozy, I think this convo may go a little better if you explain what your personally definition is of "giving power away"? I've heard it before and in some instances of its use I understood it but I'm not understanding its use here. Thanks.

I think he means socially, but one on one, not so much