Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - hsindermann - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 11:55 AM)dissonance Wrote: Anyone remember where Shannon posted the info about the bell curve on how many loops were most likely to be ideal for users for v2.3?

Can only remember he said 7, 4, 2 were best in order of decreasing effect.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 12:01 PM)hsindermann Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 11:55 AM)dissonance Wrote: Anyone remember where Shannon posted the info about the bell curve on how many loops were most likely to be ideal for users for v2.3?

Can only remember he said 7, 4, 2 were best in order of decreasing effect.

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7872-post-127841.html#pid127841
(08-20-2016, 07:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: Yes, I have concluded that 2.x is unlikely to have all the technology and additions necessary to achieve the goal. 2.3 is just going to show me what the healing modules were and/or were not doing in 2.2, and allow me to adjust accordingly for 3.x. However, if I am wrong and 2.3 blows everyone away... well, I'll be glad to be wrong in that case!

By the way, optimal loops modeling is as follows:

1st place/best results: 7 loops per day/night.
2nd place, good results: 4 loops/day
3rd place, alright results: 2 loops/day.



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 12:22 PM)4Kingdoms Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 12:01 PM)hsindermann Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 11:55 AM)dissonance Wrote: Anyone remember where Shannon posted the info about the bell curve on how many loops were most likely to be ideal for users for v2.3?

Can only remember he said 7, 4, 2 were best in order of decreasing effect.

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7872-post-127841.html#pid127841
(08-20-2016, 07:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: Yes, I have concluded that 2.x is unlikely to have all the technology and additions necessary to achieve the goal. 2.3 is just going to show me what the healing modules were and/or were not doing in 2.2, and allow me to adjust accordingly for 3.x. However, if I am wrong and 2.3 blows everyone away... well, I'll be glad to be wrong in that case!

By the way, optimal loops modeling is as follows:

1st place/best results: 7 loops per day/night.
2nd place, good results: 4 loops/day
3rd place, alright results: 2 loops/day.


Many thanks. Smile

How are things with the PSL btw?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 08-25-2016

Shannon I have a question for you. What is the last, toughest, thing that you've been through?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 07:04 AM)Lowe Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 06:18 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 05:25 AM)cataleya Wrote: What is the awakener?

Like coffee replacement in the morning.

Awakener for late-night work or study as well I am hoping. Many people could really use that, me included.

Anyone who isn't listening to a sub that has state shifting could always listen to isochronic tones, bilateral harmonics, or even brain.fm to wake up and/or focus.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DisneylandUSA - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 03:58 PM)RTBoss Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 07:04 AM)Lowe Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 06:18 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 05:25 AM)cataleya Wrote: What is the awakener?

Like coffee replacement in the morning.

Awakener for late-night work or study as well I am hoping. Many people could really use that, me included.

Anyone who isn't listening to a sub that has state shifting could always listen to isochronic tones, bilateral harmonics, or even brain.fm to wake up and/or focus.
Have you seen good results ?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 01:10 AM)bogdy Wrote:
(08-24-2016, 07:25 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-24-2016, 01:05 PM)bogdy Wrote: Shannon, any chance on releasing the awakener?

Yes. That is in the works also.

In the near future?

That depends on whether I release it in 5.5G or 5G. In 5G all I have to do is rebuild it in all three tracks, and calculate the ASRB ratio. In 5.5G, I have to basically revamp it from the ground up. I was planing to release it in 5G first. Maybe in a month or two, or perhaps less than a month, depending on how things go.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 05:25 AM)cataleya Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 01:10 AM)bogdy Wrote:
(08-24-2016, 07:25 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-24-2016, 01:05 PM)bogdy Wrote: Shannon, any chance on releasing the awakener?

Yes. That is in the works also.

In the near future?

What is the awakener?

The reverse of the 5G sleep aid. It was originally created to help test the sleep aid (making it reversible at will) and also as an effort to create a program that would be useful on it's own.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 03:12 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Shannon I have a question for you. What is the last, toughest, thing that you've been through?

Last toughest? Having my trust and heart demolished repeatedly and pretty much completely by a particular woman I was so in love with that I could not bring myself to leave her until I was destroyed by not doing so, and forced to outgrow the beliefs that allowed that destruction to happen.

Overall toughest? Cancer. Hands down. I don't know how people do that more than once. Seriously.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 05:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 03:12 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Shannon I have a question for you. What is the last, toughest, thing that you've been through?

Last toughest? Having my trust and heart demolished repeatedly and pretty much completely by a particular woman I was so in love with that I could not bring myself to leave her until I was destroyed by not doing so, and forced to outgrow the beliefs that allowed that destruction to happen.

Overall toughest? Cancer. Hands down. I don't know how people do that more than once. Seriously.
Appreciate the response

If that was recent, sorry, but I could not tell at all through these forum discussions. I'm sorry to hear that happened. It gives some hope that even Shannons human heart can be broken and things still turn out ok


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-25-2016

(08-25-2016, 07:13 PM)Big Boss Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 05:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-25-2016, 03:12 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Shannon I have a question for you. What is the last, toughest, thing that you've been through?

Last toughest? Having my trust and heart demolished repeatedly and pretty much completely by a particular woman I was so in love with that I could not bring myself to leave her until I was destroyed by not doing so, and forced to outgrow the beliefs that allowed that destruction to happen.

Overall toughest? Cancer. Hands down. I don't know how people do that more than once. Seriously.
Appreciate the response

If that was recent, sorry, but I could not tell at all through these forum discussions. I'm sorry to hear that happened. It gives some hope that even Shannons human heart can be broken and things still turn out ok

I was told by my advisor, concerning the experience with the woman, "It takes a diamond to polish a diamond. Nothing else will do. How else did you think you were going to be able to outgrow that, given how strong you are? Now you're that much closer to being what you have the potential to be. Something truly spectacular."

When I saw it from that point of view, I realized, he was right. It was a necessary experience. I could not have outgrown those things otherwise, and now I am much stronger as a result. And when I realized that also, I was able to forgive her, let go and move on with my life. Now I don't have to worry about being treated like that anymore as a result of that growth. So she may not have been a pleasant instructor, but she was definitely a valuable one.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 08-26-2016

RE: Shannon's Journal, Volume 2
Recently, in developing the 6G prototype, I have come across an idea which is being developed into a couple of new technologies which seem very promising for helping to overcome and possibly even reverse resistance. I am really looking forward to testing this IRL.

Guessing Game time: so IRL = Internal Resistance Leave! = or = Internal Resistance Leveled!!
Plumetted to the ground!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 08-26-2016

Haha i'm pretty sure it's "in real life" as in seeing how it goes when people use it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Amann - 08-26-2016

Couple of general questions I was hoping the community could answer.

I'm currently running E2 (DAY 153 of 192) and wanted to get my parents on it too. Think it could help with my mums past abuse and my dads fears regarding his health and his insecurities. Was thinking of setting up the speakers to run ultrasonic while they sleep in their room.

Question is...do I need to buy 1 or 2 additional copies (they sleep in the same bed so they will be exposed the same)

Secondly as it's rather hot in the evenings they have their fan on. When calibrating the ultrasonic track do I need to take into account the noise from the fan? Don't want to damage their hearing by setting the ultrasonic so high.

Appreciate any suggestions