Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 08-16-2016

@chaosvrgn

Thank you for elaborating. That post was a HUGE help!

Here's something I've noticed since using the DMSI series... There are increased signs of attraction and increased arousal, but that is not leading to results such as dates, etc.

I am approaching. I get very little Last Minute Resistance, but I get lots of flaking and number resistance. It's odd because I'd think with increased attraction and arousal there would be an increase in women taking action congruent with that arousal and attraction.

Your comments and input would be welcome.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-16-2016

(08-16-2016, 03:38 PM)Steven Wrote: @chaosvrgn

Thank you for elaborating. That post was a HUGE help!

Here's something I've noticed since using the DMSI series... There are increased signs of attraction and increased arousal, but that is not leading to results such as dates, etc.

I am approaching. I get very little Last Minute Resistance, but I get lots of flaking and number resistance. It's odd because I'd think with increased attraction and arousal there would be an increase in women taking action congruent with that arousal and attraction.

Your comments and input would be welcome.

I know the same experience you describe here all too well. This is why I don't really put any significance with "iois". I'm a bit surprised because from reading your reports you clearly are affecting women differently now than compared to before DMSI.

I think that once all those additions that you and others suggested for v3.0 are added, I can't see flaking after they give you their number being an issue. We'll have to wait and see.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016

(08-16-2016, 01:19 PM)Sash Wrote:
(08-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: I feel the energy. It's less obvious than v1, but noticeable. I also notice I'm burning energy much faster. And I'm noticing people acting differently around me with just a few minutes. Up to 30 feet away, I have seen what appears to have been responses to the aura, even from multiple women at the same time. A mother/daughter combo once, too.

But nothing that would convince Ricardo, so it must be wishful thinking. Big Grin

You shouldn't release another dmsi update unless you actually get laid with a few attractive girls which you haven't from your journals. Your journals and only full of iois and kept saying you could have banged some but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. You should have never released this product if you yourself haven't gotten laid from it.

P in the V is the only IOI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, I guess we have to listen to Sash on this one. No more updates or releases to DMSI until I get P in the V. A few different times. With girls he finds attractive. (Not women, of course, they're probably too old for his taste.) After all, my journal is only full of IOIs and I kept saying I could have banged her but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. I should have never released this product If I myself haven't gotten laid from it.

Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify.

In the mean time, guys, sucks to be you. It'll be a few months. Maybe. Might take longer. Can't release 2.3 or 2.4 now, obviously.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 08-16-2016

Shannon is there an ETA on the release for 2.3?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016

(08-16-2016, 04:38 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: Shannon is there an ETA on the release for 2.3?

I was going to release it on the 20th or the 21st, but obviously, I can't release it now. Haven't gotten laid at least three times yet.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 08-16-2016

Shannon Wrote:Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify.

In the mean time, guys, sucks to be you. It'll be a few months. Maybe. Might take longer. Can't release 2.3 or 2.4 now, obviously.

I wish I had put some money down cause I knew this was going to happen. Shannon if you're truly not going to release V2.3 I can certainly understand at this point just let me know so I can fire up V2.2 again.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Aventus45 - 08-16-2016

(08-16-2016, 04:59 PM)K-Train Wrote:
Shannon Wrote:Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify.

In the mean time, guys, sucks to be you. It'll be a few months. Maybe. Might take longer. Can't release 2.3 or 2.4 now, obviously.

I wish I had put some money down cause I knew this was going to happen. Shannon if you're truly not going to release V2.3 I can certainly understand at this point just let me know so I can fire up V2.2 again.

I took it as sarcasm lol.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016

I'm certainly getting tired of the crap, but I'm not going to be petty. 2.3 is coming.

The question I have floating in my head is..

Do I want to release 2.3, or Stage 1 (2.4) and Stage 2 (2.3) or do I want to deal with all the claims of "placebo" by releasing three subliminals labeled A, B and C, with one of them being 2.3 in ultrasonic, one being an ultrasonic subliminal audio of the words "Somewhere in the world, people are walking.", and one being the ultrasonic subliminalized trickling stream (no instruction set)?

Haven't decided. But getting tired of the stupid and useless criticisms, when I have stated many times that this is experimental technology, in development, may not even be possible, and is being attempted as a secondary influence (you use the sub, someone else gets affected). Once again, I don't mind constructive criticisms, but the seemingly endless stupid and useless criticisms are why I have decided not to do public testing anymore after DMSI.

Also, FYI, if the 2.x series does not please me, I would like you to know that I will build and release 3.0 with all the bells and whistles, and release it as a free upgrade. I may not be able to achieve the design goals otherwise. So you guys have nothing to worry about. I'm not about to scam you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-16-2016

(08-16-2016, 04:27 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-16-2016, 01:19 PM)Sash Wrote:
(08-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: I feel the energy. It's less obvious than v1, but noticeable. I also notice I'm burning energy much faster. And I'm noticing people acting differently around me with just a few minutes. Up to 30 feet away, I have seen what appears to have been responses to the aura, even from multiple women at the same time. A mother/daughter combo once, too.

But nothing that would convince Ricardo, so it must be wishful thinking. Big Grin

You shouldn't release another dmsi update unless you actually get laid with a few attractive girls which you haven't from your journals. Your journals and only full of iois and kept saying you could have banged some but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. You should have never released this product if you yourself haven't gotten laid from it.

P in the V is the only IOI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, I guess we have to listen to Sash on this one. No more updates or releases to DMSI until I get P in the V. A few different times. With girls he finds attractive. (Not women, of course, they're probably too old for his taste.) After all, my journal is only full of IOIs and I kept saying I could have banged her but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. I should have never released this product If I myself haven't gotten laid from it.

Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify.

In the mean time, guys, sucks to be you. It'll be a few months. Maybe. Might take longer. Can't release 2.3 or 2.4 now, obviously.

I can't tell if your being sarcastic or serious here.

It's awesome that you believe that 3.0 will definitely accomplish the design goals. That's exciting! And it's great that you will thoroughly test the program to get it where you and your customers want it to be. However, if you do keep the testing exclusive to people who aren't apart of this forum, please use just as varied a sample size as what is currently on the forum. Like some users haven't had results yet like CatMan and Swisston, while others like Minititan have had at least 1 experience that is exactly what we're aiming for. As long as there's variety in the testers, the data should be accurate for an idea of final release results.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JJ54 - 08-16-2016

(08-16-2016, 05:12 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm certainly getting tired of the crap, but I'm not going to be petty. 2.3 is coming.

The question I have floating in my head is..

Do I want to release 2.3, or Stage 1 (2.4) and Stage 2 (2.3) or do I want to deal with all the claims of "placebo" by releasing three subliminals labeled A, B and C, with one of them being 2.3 in ultrasonic, one being an ultrasonic subliminal audio of the words "Somewhere in the world, people are walking.", and one being the ultrasonic subliminalized trickling stream (no instruction set)?

Haven't decided. But getting tired of the stupid and useless criticisms, when I have stated many times that this is experimental technology, in development, may not even be possible, and is being attempted as a secondary influence (you use the sub, someone else gets affected). Once again, I don't mind constructive criticisms, but the seemingly endless stupid and useless criticisms are why I have decided not to do public testing anymore after DMSI.

Also, FYI, if the 2.x series does not please me, I would like you to know that I will build and release 3.0 with all the bells and whistles, and release it as a free upgrade. I may not be able to achieve the design goals otherwise. So you guys have nothing to worry about. I'm not about to scam you.

Shannon, I would like to say that I enjoy being a tester for this new technology, let alone DMSI. I came into this with little expectations, and gotten more than I expected in return. No, it hasn't gotten me laid. But just learning how to read body language, know when a woman is turned on, and having confidence in my attractiveness is more than enough in my book. The attention I'm receiving now far outweighs what I was getting beforehand.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016

(08-16-2016, 05:20 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(08-16-2016, 04:27 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-16-2016, 01:19 PM)Sash Wrote:
(08-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: I feel the energy. It's less obvious than v1, but noticeable. I also notice I'm burning energy much faster. And I'm noticing people acting differently around me with just a few minutes. Up to 30 feet away, I have seen what appears to have been responses to the aura, even from multiple women at the same time. A mother/daughter combo once, too.

But nothing that would convince Ricardo, so it must be wishful thinking. Big Grin

You shouldn't release another dmsi update unless you actually get laid with a few attractive girls which you haven't from your journals. Your journals and only full of iois and kept saying you could have banged some but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. You should have never released this product if you yourself haven't gotten laid from it.

P in the V is the only IOI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, I guess we have to listen to Sash on this one. No more updates or releases to DMSI until I get P in the V. A few different times. With girls he finds attractive. (Not women, of course, they're probably too old for his taste.) After all, my journal is only full of IOIs and I kept saying I could have banged her but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. I should have never released this product If I myself haven't gotten laid from it.

Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify.

In the mean time, guys, sucks to be you. It'll be a few months. Maybe. Might take longer. Can't release 2.3 or 2.4 now, obviously.

I can't tell if your being sarcastic or serious here.

It's awesome that you believe that 3.0 will definitely accomplish the design goals. That's exciting! And it's great that you will thoroughly test the program to get it where you and your customers want it to be. However, if you do keep the testing exclusive to people who aren't apart of this forum, please use just as varied a sample size as what is currently on the forum. Like some users haven't had results yet like CatMan and Swisston, while others like Minititan have had at least 1 experience that is exactly what we're aiming for. As long as there's variety in the testers, the data should be accurate for an idea of final release results.

See my post above that you missed.

I do not believe 3.0 will definitely achieve the design goals. I believe it is most likely going to - but we may have to do 3.1, 2, etc. to work out kinks, and maybe even 4.x.

But I am about 98% sure that in the end, we will succeed. Otherwise I would not be willing to put in all this time, and effort, and give away free upgrades all over the place in the process.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - fibonacciw - 08-16-2016

Just keep doing what you are doing.One of the reason why I brought the program because of the new tech you have been working on. So don't let a few frustrate you. I am and will be a life long customer of yours. If everyone truly understand the dynamics of what you are trying to accomplish. It could change the way one view self and the world. IMO....


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-16-2016

(08-16-2016, 05:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-16-2016, 05:20 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(08-16-2016, 04:27 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(08-16-2016, 01:19 PM)Sash Wrote:
(08-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: I feel the energy. It's less obvious than v1, but noticeable. I also notice I'm burning energy much faster. And I'm noticing people acting differently around me with just a few minutes. Up to 30 feet away, I have seen what appears to have been responses to the aura, even from multiple women at the same time. A mother/daughter combo once, too.

But nothing that would convince Ricardo, so it must be wishful thinking. Big Grin

You shouldn't release another dmsi update unless you actually get laid with a few attractive girls which you haven't from your journals. Your journals and only full of iois and kept saying you could have banged some but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. You should have never released this product if you yourself haven't gotten laid from it.

P in the V is the only IOI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, I guess we have to listen to Sash on this one. No more updates or releases to DMSI until I get P in the V. A few different times. With girls he finds attractive. (Not women, of course, they're probably too old for his taste.) After all, my journal is only full of IOIs and I kept saying I could have banged her but never did and gave excuse after excuse for not even banging one girl. I should have never released this product If I myself haven't gotten laid from it.

Okay, Sash. I'm following your advice. No more updates or releases of DMSI until I finish 3.0 and get laid with at least three different girls (not women) who you find attractive. I'll let you know when I have pictures for you to approve for me, so I can know if they qualify.

In the mean time, guys, sucks to be you. It'll be a few months. Maybe. Might take longer. Can't release 2.3 or 2.4 now, obviously.

I can't tell if your being sarcastic or serious here.

It's awesome that you believe that 3.0 will definitely accomplish the design goals. That's exciting! And it's great that you will thoroughly test the program to get it where you and your customers want it to be. However, if you do keep the testing exclusive to people who aren't apart of this forum, please use just as varied a sample size as what is currently on the forum. Like some users haven't had results yet like CatMan and Swisston, while others like Minititan have had at least 1 experience that is exactly what we're aiming for. As long as there's variety in the testers, the data should be accurate for an idea of final release results.

See my post above that you missed.

I do not believe 3.0 will definitely achieve the design goals. I believe it is most likely going to - but we may have to do 3.1, 2, etc. to work out kinks, and maybe even 4.x.

But I am about 98% sure that in the end, we will succeed. Otherwise I would not be willing to put in all this time, and effort, and give away free upgrades all over the place in the process.

I was a bit slow posting from my smartphone.

I would totally enjoy being a part of the DMSI testing myself, but I gotta finish E2. I think making the testing open like this was the best way to go about getting the necessary data for tweaking and refining the sub so it'll succeed. It just seems like maybe the next time (if you ever do it again), you should have a few pages with the words "BETA TESTING" covering them. It seems like a lot of people didn't take the necessary time to read that it's experimental before purchasing.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-16-2016

(08-16-2016, 05:24 PM)yeah! Wrote: The double blind (triple?) placebo control sounds awesome. Would the placebo give a reading on frequencee?

For this test to be double blind, I will have to make the audio files and have someone else label them as A, B and C for me to not know any more than you do which ones are what until after the experiment is concluded. That's what I would do if I do run the testing like that.

The placebo would for all intents and purposes be undetectable as such aside from actual effects produced by 2.3 that the other two do not produce. Otherwise there would be a way to defeat the double blind nature of the experiment.