(07-06-2016, 05:22 PM)maxx55 Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:07 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon,

I like this line for DMSI/AOSI/DAOSI/CNN/HUGDIHX/WHATEVER

"all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them", rather than the age limiter statement if I had to choose between them even though I think a lot of wording in it is unnecessary. Many countries have different age consent laws, and under different situations, so it's unlikely people would somehow inherently know what age a person is and somehow know what age is legal or not in whatever country they're in and what circumstances. I'd rather not have a lawyer in my head. Seems like it would just inhibit performance and complicate it's process, like maybe if a girl looks younger than she is etc., similar to how the earlier sexual orientation limiters did. I'd really prefer not having a minefield like age limiting in the sub, that could ruin it for someone like me who travels a lot and countries have vastly different laws. Please don't put something like that in there. Let's get the sub to the point of actually working as advertised, before we nerf it down with conditions before it starts to work. Makes sense to me.

I thought this too when I read the statement. Can you elaborate on exactly what it means Shannon? And will we know the statement you end up going with when you build 2.2?

(07-06-2016, 05:18 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: No. It takes too much power away from the user. Any time you take responsibility out of your hands in life shit gets ugly.

(07-06-2016, 05:49 PM)Womanizer Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:18 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: No. It takes too much power away from the user. Any time you take responsibility out of your hands in life shit gets ugly.

That can be balanced with the person running the subliminal to want to seduce them as well , creating balance.

(07-06-2016, 06:06 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Maybe.

I am wondering how using a sub can make someone else decide to seduce you anyways. I mean, if Shannon can do that, then I want to see a "sit on your couch and attract women" sub.

Shannon Wrote:The program is designed to generate an aura of SEXUAL IRRESISTIBILITY. It is designed to get THEM to initiate and have physical sex with YOU. How do you suppose this is going to affect females? Of course it's making them wet. Of course they have to go wipe up sometimes. How do you get a woman to initiate sex with a guy she's never met? OVERWELMING SEXUAL AROUSAL AND ATTRACTION RESPONSE TO HIM!

(07-06-2016, 06:06 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:49 PM)Womanizer Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:18 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: No. It takes too much power away from the user. Any time you take responsibility out of your hands in life shit gets ugly.

That can be balanced with the person running the subliminal to want to seduce them as well , creating balance.

Maybe.

I am wondering how using a sub can make someone else decide to seduce you anyways. I mean, if Shannon can do that, then I want to see a "sit on your couch and attract women" sub.

1. Your comliness (how physically attractive you are)
   
2. Your height
   
3. Your body type
   
4. Your weight
   
5. Your age
   
6. Your gender (hehe)
   
7. The color of your skin
   
8. Your race
   
9. Your body language
   
10. How her friends react to you
    
11. How others react to you
    
12. Your attitude
    
13. Your actions
    
14. Your choices
    
15. What you say
    
16. How you say it
    
17. The speed at which you act, move and speak
    
18. and perhaps the biggest and most important one of all... how she FEELS in response to you.
    

(07-06-2016, 06:06 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:49 PM)Womanizer Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:18 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: No. It takes too much power away from the user. Any time you take responsibility out of your hands in life shit gets ugly.

That can be balanced with the person running the subliminal to want to seduce them as well , creating balance.

Maybe.

I am wondering how using a sub can make someone else decide to seduce you anyways. I mean, if Shannon can do that, then I want to see a "sit on your couch and attract women" sub.

(07-06-2016, 06:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: The phrasing that is leading is not one of the options I published.

(07-06-2016, 05:43 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:22 PM)maxx55 Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:07 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon,

I like this line for DMSI/AOSI/DAOSI/CNN/HUGDIHX/WHATEVER

"all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them", rather than the age limiter statement if I had to choose between them even though I think a lot of wording in it is unnecessary. Many countries have different age consent laws, and under different situations, so it's unlikely people would somehow inherently know what age a person is and somehow know what age is legal or not in whatever country they're in and what circumstances. I'd rather not have a lawyer in my head. Seems like it would just inhibit performance and complicate it's process, like maybe if a girl looks younger than she is etc., similar to how the earlier sexual orientation limiters did. I'd really prefer not having a minefield like age limiting in the sub, that could ruin it for someone like me who travels a lot and countries have vastly different laws. Please don't put something like that in there. Let's get the sub to the point of actually working as advertised, before we nerf it down with conditions before it starts to work. Makes sense to me.

I thought this too when I read the statement. Can you elaborate on exactly what it means Shannon? And will we know the statement you end up going with when you build 2.2?

Catman: As a United Statesian, who comes from the "land of the free", you don't have the right - BY FEDERAL LAW - to choose what country to go to to select the age of consent laws you prefer. According to federal law, you will be punished for statutory rape for having sex with anyone under the age of 18 while outside of the country, upon your return. Let "freedom" ring....

Maxx, it means that the program would target and focus on getting people who already want to sexually seduce you and have sex with you, to act on and make those desires reality.

What you are all forgetting in your orgy of conscious gatekeeping here, is that the models show me what will produce the best results. This is not always going to be what you might expect. And, as a result, I have decided that I'm not going to release the wording that goes in, or the other 13 options I just finished calculating, because you guys are too into looking for reasons it can't work, or how to derail it.

Whatever the models select as being the wording that produces the most happy majority of customers in response to how well it works, that's what you'll get.

I am now off to run the 15 semi-finalists through the models and narrow it down to the best of the best through several more rounds of modeling.

(07-06-2016, 07:50 PM)CatMan Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:43 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:22 PM)maxx55 Wrote:

(07-06-2016, 05:07 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon,

I like this line for DMSI/AOSI/DAOSI/CNN/HUGDIHX/WHATEVER

"all of the attractive people of the gender I am sexually attracted to, who want to seduce me into having sex with them", rather than the age limiter statement if I had to choose between them even though I think a lot of wording in it is unnecessary. Many countries have different age consent laws, and under different situations, so it's unlikely people would somehow inherently know what age a person is and somehow know what age is legal or not in whatever country they're in and what circumstances. I'd rather not have a lawyer in my head. Seems like it would just inhibit performance and complicate it's process, like maybe if a girl looks younger than she is etc., similar to how the earlier sexual orientation limiters did. I'd really prefer not having a minefield like age limiting in the sub, that could ruin it for someone like me who travels a lot and countries have vastly different laws. Please don't put something like that in there. Let's get the sub to the point of actually working as advertised, before we nerf it down with conditions before it starts to work. Makes sense to me.

I thought this too when I read the statement. Can you elaborate on exactly what it means Shannon? And will we know the statement you end up going with when you build 2.2?

Catman: As a United Statesian, who comes from the "land of the free", you don't have the right - BY FEDERAL LAW - to choose what country to go to to select the age of consent laws you prefer. According to federal law, you will be punished for statutory rape for having sex with anyone under the age of 18 while outside of the country, upon your return. Let "freedom" ring....

Maxx, it means that the program would target and focus on getting people who already want to sexually seduce you and have sex with you, to act on and make those desires reality.

What you are all forgetting in your orgy of conscious gatekeeping here, is that the models show me what will produce the best results. This is not always going to be what you might expect. And, as a result, I have decided that I'm not going to release the wording that goes in, or the other 13 options I just finished calculating, because you guys are too into looking for reasons it can't work, or how to derail it.

Whatever the models select as being the wording that produces the most happy majority of customers in response to how well it works, that's what you'll get.

I am now off to run the 15 semi-finalists through the models and narrow it down to the best of the best through several more rounds of modeling.

I'm not an American.