(06-24-2016, 03:40 PM)maxx55 Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 03:31 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 03:16 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 01:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: The only thing you need is enough emotional passion and focus. It can be pleasurable or terrifying, but if you have enough emotional passion (read: energy concentration input) and focus, it will work, as long as the rest of the variables are also done correctly.

This is why people succeed in manifesting their worst fears much more often than what they really wish they had.

lol, you're being ahead of your time again, Shannon.

In the particular discipline of mental alchemy that I study (the one referenced in my username), practitioners are JUST NOW (seriously, like in the last few months) starting to openly acknowledge that you can use any kind of emotion -- pleasurable or terrifying -- to charge and send off an intent. Before, they either ignored the role of emotion or relied on positive feelings (laughter and comedy) to handle everything.

Here's an interesting story:

I was in a huge argument with a colleague last year because I was experimenting with charging... pictorial depictions of affirmations (trying not to break rule #4 if that even applies) with negative emotions and she almost lost her sh*t. Told me the universe was going to explode or some crap. Recently, when I told her that the manifestation came to pass AND it seemed more profound, she outright called me a liar.

It's actually very ancient knowledge. Just not common knowledge, because it's only relatively recently that this knowledge is being released to the general public. It's time for it to be public. But I was trained in this more than 2 decades ago, and its origins trace back into and gets lost in the mists of time. The furthest back any of my instructors could trace it was to between approximately 6,000 and 10,000 years ago. You just have to have had access to those "in the know". They are not exactly very common - yet.

I think you are misunderstanding something. You can use negative emotions etc. to power causality manipulation and get a positive result, but it is much less desirable to do so. Just because you did it once and it does not seem to have had any negative impact means nothing. Causality manipulation does not play by normal rules of time and space. The strictures on using negative energy are there because of literally thousands of years of experience, passed down from Master to Apprentice, and of course every apprentice tries to break the rules.

The "way it works" is not always easily observable or easily understood. Your actions, even when the energy you are manipulating is neutral or positive, can have negative end results. Negative energy can have positive results. It's not just the polarity of energy you use to power it, it's also how you control the rest of the manipulation and achieve your goals with it.

I cannot recommend enough avoiding negative energy and emotions as an engine for your causality manipulations. But of course just because my first instructor told me not to do it, doesn't mean I didn't have to learn why the hard way, just like every other apprentice.

I just hope you don't make the mistakes I made before I really understood. They were very, very costly. I have seen a number of people win the Darwin award using causality manipulation in negative ways without a real understanding of what they are doing and the rules and laws they are interacting with.

My advice: avoid negatives.

One question. How does one learn causality manipulation?

(06-24-2016, 03:40 PM)maxx55 Wrote: One question. How does one learn causality manipulation?

Quote:Ray knocks down Shannon's office door: Say my name.

Shannon: Who the f*ck are you?

Ray: I've been requesting you to build me a imagination sub since freaking ages! Now, say my name.

Shannon: Ray? Ray!

Ray: You are godamn right. Now build me the goddamn sub!

Quote:Ben is your angus ready?

(06-24-2016, 06:20 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Com'mon Shannon - I know you're runnin' it right now! Where's that first impression!? :-D

(06-24-2016, 06:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 06:20 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Com'mon Shannon - I know you're runnin' it right now! Where's that first impression!? :-D

Sadly, I have it on my phone, but I cannot play it yet. Frustrating, to be sure, but I have other things to attend to right now that preclude doing that until tomorrow. One must honor their promises. And it would be really not appropriate to expose those I am with this evening.

However, I just finished putting it into the hands of four testers, including a new one who is in Chicago. We will know what's what soon enough guys.

(06-24-2016, 06:59 PM)bogdy Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 06:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 06:20 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Com'mon Shannon - I know you're runnin' it right now! Where's that first impression!? :-D

Sadly, I have it on my phone, but I cannot play it yet. Frustrating, to be sure, but I have other things to attend to right now that preclude doing that until tomorrow. One must honor their promises. And it would be really not appropriate to expose those I am with this evening.

However, I just finished putting it into the hands of four testers, including a new one who is in Chicago. We will know what's what soon enough guys.

So if I understood, you going to test it for a week by yourself + models, then you gonna release it for the v1 owners?