+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-15-2016
(06-15-2016, 01:18 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: Shannon, How loud should you play the silent speaker test mp3 please?
I have a mac book pro 2015 laptop. I did play this at the volume id normally want to play the silent track and it worked without any hiccups.
For the past 8 days I've played the silent track again without any issue.
I used frequensee and it showed that my signal was around 19KHZ and about -50 to -30db from speaker to my ears and further behind.
Today however I played the track at full volume as I was away from my laptop and wanted to make sure if reached my ears. When I sat down at the laptop I then could hear crackling.
When I played the free silent testing mp3, at this loud volume (full volume both on my laptop and my iTunes player), then I could hear crackling very very low and only if I bring my ears to the speakers of the laptop. My apartment is super quiet and this is why I could hear this but its only when Im sat at the laptop.
Is there any issue with my laptop therefore playing silent tracks? i hope not now
Play it at the same levels of audio you would anything else.
All you need to do is calibrate.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-15-2016
I just got back from doing an experiment with AOSI. The second one in three days. Both times, I ran it for ~20 minutes before going to have something to eat. Both times I got an almost identical response.
The first time, my server was a heavyset chick who I know is attracted to me, but she is avoidant regarding me because she knows that a smaller and more dominant server is definitely interested in me. That day she served me, forgot my silverware, and gave me significantly more than what they are supposed to put on a large antipasto salad there. She then disappeared, and I had to hunt down silverware for myself.
These three things have never happened before.
By the end of my 45 minutes there, and it took all of that to finish eating so much food, she was giving a definite vibe of "I feel close to you, and I want to be intimate with you, but I can't."
Today I went to Ruby Tuesday's and upon walking in, I was immediately and very enthusiatically greeted by one of my favorite bartendresses. Unusually so. She was genuinely happy to see me, whereas usually it's a polite hello, how are you, and then she's back to work. This time it was, "Oh boy, it's Shannon! Yay!!!"
Within seconds of sitting down, the woman sitting to my right started a conversation with me. And she wasn't just talking, you could tell this was urgent. She was on me like white on rice. She was in her 50's, and I was starving, so I wasn't really all that interactive. Then I started getting IOIs from a girl who was sitting at a booth to my left, and I mean stares, hair flips, leg wagging, neck presentations followed by neck covers and back and forth like she couldn't make up her mind if she wanted to run or get some. Her friend/sister seemed entirely un-phased the whole time.
The woman sitting to my right made a special point to say goodbye to me when she left in a way that was unnecessary, and reiterated the interest I perceived. The bartendress was in a state that felt to me like we were bonded emotionally, like I was her long term boyfriend or husband. She didn't seem to know how to handle that, since she's married, and consequently she was quiet after the initial greeting, and found excuses to disappear into the kitchen for longer than it takes to melt my butter, the bathroom, the other side of the bar as far from me as possibe, etc. etc.
When she brought me my butter, she said, "I'm sorry, my love, it took longer than it should have."
Now I know that wait staff refer to one another as "dear" and "love" and "my love" when they are comfortable with and like someone, but this did not strike me as an "I like you" sort of response. This was more like a woman talking to her dearly beloved.
Her whole demeanor was very much as if she was feeling things for me that she could not allow herself to feel, because she was married, and yet she was feeling intimate with me anyway. This is the type of woman, by the way, who would never have sex with a man she was not at least considering for a relationship. For her, sex is deep intimacy and security. That, I believe, is why she was reacting that way to me.
The effect seemed to fade over 20-30 minutes. But wow. I'm really looking forward to trying V2 after this!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 06-15-2016
Quote:I'm adding something to AOSI V2 to get those who respond to respond with all necessary boldness, bluntness, directness, determination and assertiveness to make sex happen, and it I'm thinking the same would be good for the user as well.
Every day this thing gets more and more intriguing.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-15-2016
(06-15-2016, 08:51 PM)RTBoss Wrote:Quote:I'm adding something to AOSI V2 to get those who respond to respond with all necessary boldness, bluntness, directness, determination and assertiveness to make sex happen, and it I'm thinking the same would be good for the user as well.
Every day this thing gets more and more intriguing.
Tell me about it.
I'm getting dangerous results from just 20 minutes of exposure, and then I'm doing all this? Fugeddaboudit.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-15-2016
(06-15-2016, 09:13 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: So if DAOSI achieves its goal completely would the users of DAOSI be essentially flipping the traditional dynamic of men pursuing women? Like if you go to a party the women will be trying to pick you up?
I would like it so that the result is that those people you want to have sex with, approach and initiate with you, and the user is able to act in kind as long as it isn't forced behavior. For example, if a married woman approached you and flashed you some kitty and said, "Let's go have sex," you would not go have sex with her because the program told you to if that is not something you would have moral objections to doing. (Having sex with a married woman.) But, if that was something you were okay with doing, you could.
Likewise with an unmarried woman, I want the program to enable you to act in the right ways in response to their come-ons and expressions of interest so that sex happens, without forcing it on you.
But the goal is to get the user to have others approach and initiate, ultimately, yes. I don't know how well I can actually accomplish that goal, but that's the goal.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 06-15-2016
Im much more interested in healing emotionally and AOMI.... I can hear Shannon going Oh shit here we go again..another damn suggestion for a sub!:-) dont blame you Shannon !! what is AOMI.... Money Magnet/Aura of Money Irresistabilty ..like money literally falling at your feet ,in your lap,blowin down the street landing on your shoes....oppurtunites comng to you outta da blue...success out da ying yang...you cant tell me you havent thot about something along these lines or hyping up a re-do of BAMM or Ultra Sucess on cyber steriods 'er something along these lines Shannon.
I mean LOOK at what 20 minutes on AOSI is doing..can YOU imagine AOUSI...aura of hyper Ultra Success or successsful iresssitabilty,etc???? success in ALL forms that CANNOT resist you !!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-15-2016
(06-15-2016, 09:43 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Im much more interested in healing emotionally and AOMI.... I can hear Shannon going Oh shit here we go again..another damn suggestion for a sub!:-) dont blame you Shannon !! what is AOMI.... Money Magnet/Aura of Money Irresistabilty ..like money literally falling at your feet ,in your lap,blowin down the street landing on your shoes....oppurtunites comng to you outta da blue...success out da ying yang...you cant tell me you havent thot about something along these lines or hyping up a re-do of BAMM or Ultra Sucess on cyber steriods 'er something along these lines Shannon.
I mean LOOK at what 20 minutes on AOSI is doing..can YOU imagine AOUSI...aura of hyper Ultra Success or successsful iresssitabilty,etc???? success in ALL forms that CANNOT resist you !!
You and I both know good and well, sir, that that is comparing apples to whales. Vastly different dynamic, action, energy levels, and environmental interactivity.
I'm not even sure I can make DAOSI do what it's supposed to do, and it has the benefit of interacting with living, conscious, incarnate minds that can directly interact with and impact their environment in real time.
Since when did I surpass the limits of human abilities?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 06-15-2016
Ohhh well it was worth a SHOT ! :-) who said that Aura of Hyper Success couldnt or wouldnt INVOLVE OTHER sentient beings,it most certianly would indeed. success with interaction of others and making the connections there or...sorry if I didnt include that previously but I assumed you'd know,my bad. I Most deinftely meant and do mean that such a hyped up success program including attracting money would most defintley involve incarnate sentient beings - da Hu-man Be-ing types :-)
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 06-16-2016
Hey Shannon, is MIR2 going to be in 5.5G? Also, do you think it would help my mother, who has chronic Lyme disease (a nasty bacterial infection)? Or is it more designed for acute viral infections?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 06-16-2016
Ok i'm revisiting the sales page of E2 and I realized my habit from getting as many hours as possible from other programs may not apply here. I've probably been doing 14-16 hours.
Quote:Expected optimal usage per day will be between 8 and 12 hours for most people.
Should I just limit it at 12 hours Shannon? Am I just investing those extra hours at no benefit in this case?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 06-16-2016
(06-16-2016, 03:08 AM)Benjamin Wrote: Ok i'm revisiting the sales page of E2 and I realized my habit from getting as many hours as possible from other programs may not apply here. I've probably been doing 14-16 hours.
Quote:Expected optimal usage per day will be between 8 and 12 hours for most people.
Should I just limit it at 12 hours Shannon? Am I just investing those extra hours at no benefit in this case?
I felt like e2 guided me to my sweet spot, which was 12-14 hours per day..... for what it's worth
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 06-16-2016
(06-15-2016, 08:51 PM)RTBoss Wrote:Quote:I'm adding something to AOSI V2 to get those who respond to respond with all necessary boldness, bluntness, directness, determination and assertiveness to make sex happen, and it I'm thinking the same would be good for the user as well.
Every day this thing gets more and more intriguing.
Basically what I read was "Sex guaranteed!" Making it difficult to stay on E2 Shannon!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 06-16-2016
(06-16-2016, 03:55 AM)Natious Wrote:(06-15-2016, 08:51 PM)RTBoss Wrote:Quote:I'm adding something to AOSI V2 to get those who respond to respond with all necessary boldness, bluntness, directness, determination and assertiveness to make sex happen, and it I'm thinking the same would be good for the user as well.
Every day this thing gets more and more intriguing.
Basically what I read was "Sex guaranteed!" Making it difficult to stay on E2 Shannon!
Stay. It'll make AOSI and everything else work so much better, and without dealing with the fears and pasts hurts first, it'll struggle to work of course. Plus, you can still get increased results with women ON E2, as the fears and past hurts vanish, you will naturally become more assertive, confident. Win-win. I may be starting to finally notice some things, so if it can turn THIS ship around, it can turn any around, trust me, lol!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 06-16-2016
(06-16-2016, 03:58 AM)CatMan Wrote:(06-16-2016, 03:55 AM)Natious Wrote:(06-15-2016, 08:51 PM)RTBoss Wrote:Quote:I'm adding something to AOSI V2 to get those who respond to respond with all necessary boldness, bluntness, directness, determination and assertiveness to make sex happen, and it I'm thinking the same would be good for the user as well.
Every day this thing gets more and more intriguing.
Basically what I read was "Sex guaranteed!" Making it difficult to stay on E2 Shannon!
Stay. It'll make AOSI and everything else work so much better, and without dealing with the fears and pasts hurts first, it'll struggle to work of course. Plus, you can still get increased results with women ON E2, as the fears and past hurts vanish, you will naturally become more assertive, confident. Win-win. I may be starting to finally notice some things, so if it can turn THIS ship around, it can turn any around, trust me, lol!
I wasn't actually going to change, just said it jokingly. E2 and ASC 6g are the only things in my near future right now. And I do agree, E2 has the most potential in overall long term improvement among the single stagers (for me).
Glad you changed your opinion on moving to AOSI
