(05-27-2016, 12:09 PM)jonathan4all Wrote: Shannon please do not make AOS 5G such in a way that we get unwanted attraction. You can make another version for Bisexuals too by changing a little in the script. Not everyone is interested to get unwanted attention from same sex or family members thanks.

(05-27-2016, 12:39 PM)K-Train Wrote: Hey Sarge, are you asking for AOSI to produce an aura that is both lustful and comforting? If so, then I agree. If not, Shannon, I'm requesting that it be put in. As Sarge stated, people are more likely to act on those desires when they feel sexually safe. Sexually safe = comfortable expressing how they feel and being their true self. This would work in conjunction with other suggestions made from other users that would prevent AOSI from repelling others.

Quote:Shannon, will this AOSI aura be recognised by people who do not come into contact with your directly? By this I mean will our presence be felt in pictures / videos / etc.? That would be very neat for those of us who are on dating sites, for example.

I will be jumping aboard the AOSI train as well. I have been on AOS for 2 months but got nothing except some acne (resistance?) and maybe people being friendlier to me. AOSI looks like it will be a major step up.

(05-27-2016, 01:16 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: I'm really dismayed at the fact that we're literally taking part in history being made as I honestly believe IML will forever change the face of self-improvement (and medicine, and psychology AND esoteric practices, etc.) within the next five years...

... and all I'm seeing is a bunch of fear-driven madness about "da gays lookin' at mah dick." Like seriously, c'mon. You're not going to be running around with a bunch of ravenous men chasing behind you, mouths drooling, trying to rip your clothes off. If anything, you'll get hit on, you'll say no thank you and that'll be it.

Honest, I really hope to see Shannon focus his attentions on creating subs beyond getting people laid. I can imagine that it must be tiring to focus on the same thing over and over again, especially when you've created something so revolutionary like 6g.

After this, how about we ask for more exploration of ourselves and the universe and actually buy the product and support it when it's made?

Sh*t, give me "Lucid Dreaming & Astral Travel at Will 6g" any day. But I'm into esoteric stuff, so that's just me. But the sheer potential of this technology still astounds me. How about "Increase Your Fluid Intelligence 6g?" People born with low cognitive function being able to listen to an mp3 for a year, and have the same chance at success as everyone else. What if things like DNA repair is possible through subliminal technology?

Something to think about.

(05-27-2016, 02:40 PM)Banksy Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 02:19 PM)apollolux Wrote: It sounds like people here feel they lack tact when rejecting others, probably out of GSF. If that's the case, you're probably not ready to be sexually irresistible or a magnet and need to run something else for a bit.

My issue was with potential efficiency problems and I feel Shannon explained his approach and testing methods sufficiently enough that I'm confident he'll get it done satisfactorily.

Maybe, but isn't this program supposed to be used by itself, as in you don't have to run a six stage set before you qualify? This program is also for women, and sometimes tact is not enough, for men and women. And if tact is the issue then tact is what I am requesting, it doesn't come naturally to everyone, as everyone was raised differently.

It may sound arrogant, but I think it's a real concern, especially if there's no foundation building.

And secondly, it was just an opinion.

(05-27-2016, 05:19 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 09:23 AM)InTheZone Wrote: Hey Shannon,

I was wondering if you were doing anything new with the manifestation part of BIABW?

It is optimized and 5.5G, and is using active manifestation scripting -- to the degree that I have it figured out so far.

(05-27-2016, 04:21 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: is it a common thing with E2 to feel confused,bewildered,slightly lost...then feeling of elation and flying high naturally or vice versa,feelings of joy and upliftment then something gets triggered then bamm??? 5 days into it. Keith.
PS: Im doing my BEST to welcome it all coz I KNOW without a doubt the good sheet is working like a Mofo and working a good Mojo on Me ! thanx Man.

(05-27-2016, 05:14 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Shannon --

Any chance of getting E2 integrated into it?

(05-27-2016, 05:30 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 05:19 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 09:23 AM)InTheZone Wrote: Hey Shannon,

I was wondering if you were doing anything new with the manifestation part of BIABW?

It is optimized and 5.5G, and is using active manifestation scripting -- to the degree that I have it figured out so far.

Just curious. What is it manifesting exactly? More women to show sexual interest in us?

(05-27-2016, 05:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 02:40 PM)Banksy Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 02:19 PM)apollolux Wrote: It sounds like people here feel they lack tact when rejecting others, probably out of GSF. If that's the case, you're probably not ready to be sexually irresistible or a magnet and need to run something else for a bit.

My issue was with potential efficiency problems and I feel Shannon explained his approach and testing methods sufficiently enough that I'm confident he'll get it done satisfactorily.

Maybe, but isn't this program supposed to be used by itself, as in you don't have to run a six stage set before you qualify? This program is also for women, and sometimes tact is not enough, for men and women. And if tact is the issue then tact is what I am requesting, it doesn't come naturally to everyone, as everyone was raised differently.

It may sound arrogant, but I think it's a real concern, especially if there's no foundation building.

And secondly, it was just an opinion.

If tact is not enough, then be assertive. How hard is that? Or am I misunderstanding something?

(05-27-2016, 05:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 09:41 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(05-26-2016, 08:35 PM)Shannon Wrote: They will be vastly more powerful. On how quickly they affect you, how much they affect you, how deeply they affect you, how well they deal with resistance, how much better they deal with polymorphic ambiguities within the person, how well they guide you to your goal, how quickly they work, how obviously they work, how comfortably they work, etc. etc.

I take it you're suggesting that I put something in the AOIS script to get people to respond by taking responsibility for acting on their desires? Not a bad idea, let's see if that works.

Just finished tweaking up the SOS. It's not at absolute maximum optimization, but given how many options I had to go through to get it this tweaked up and optimized, and how close it is to absolute maximum, I'll take it. It's 2/37ths below absolute maximum right now. Pretty damned close.

I'm writing this on my phone so I can't quote properly.

To the first part: good to hear, I'm excited to see how the new programs work

To the second part: that's not exactly what I was getting at. But that's a good idea too, glad I could be an inspiration .

No, what I meant was: let's take the normal situation of a guy approaching a girl. One of the obstacles might be that she's afraid of what other people might think. If only she realized that, for all the other people know, the two of you are already in a hot and steamy relationship where public displays of affection are normal. Thus freeing her from the ASD. If you could expand on that realization, you could essentially create a bubble around the two of you (or three, etc) in which everything you desire is normal. People function on comfort and normality. I noticed this when I first started touching girls. At first, u got bad reactions, till it was normal, now I don't.

Extrapolate that principle to all areas combined with a females ability to backwards rationalize, and I'm sure you could create some very socially unacceptable moments well within "boring" norms.

It's also very important that this state can only be achieved for her with you, the user of the sub. Just like she won't let any guy touch her, only the guys that can. It's also important not to free her from your influence by getting her to free herself.

Hope that makes sense.

To the third part: not sure what you're talking about but it sounds crazy.

Interesting idea. I'll look at that too.

(05-27-2016, 05:07 PM)Shannon Wrote: Expectations are the road to unhappiness. Why not just leave the expectations at the door and allow the program to show you what it is capable of? That way it is always a pleasant surprise, instead of a disappointment if not every 5.5G program can work proverbial miracles.

You guys have to understand that having a 5.5G skeleton script makes the process faster, but I still have a lot of fine detail and optimization work to do with each and every one, and it's more sensitive as we gain in power. It's a lot of pressure to make these programs perfect, since I still don't really understand WHY certain things work or don't work. I have to rely on my predictive models for that in a lot of cases, unless you wouldn't mind me spending a month or three doing real work testing every time I make something new?

So to help make it easier for me - because it's scary having to face the possibility that, oh, maybe I got one of the 168 variables off by 2% and the whole thing crashes! - let's not go overboard on expectations, shall we? Let's see what happens in real life testing.

Rest assured, I will never release anything this advanced or expensive without being 99% sure it's done right and well worth more than what you pay for it. But still... it's a lot of pressure.

(05-27-2016, 06:23 PM)CatMan Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 05:07 PM)Shannon Wrote: Expectations are the road to unhappiness. Why not just leave the expectations at the door and allow the program to show you what it is capable of? That way it is always a pleasant surprise, instead of a disappointment if not every 5.5G program can work proverbial miracles.

You guys have to understand that having a 5.5G skeleton script makes the process faster, but I still have a lot of fine detail and optimization work to do with each and every one, and it's more sensitive as we gain in power. It's a lot of pressure to make these programs perfect, since I still don't really understand WHY certain things work or don't work. I have to rely on my predictive models for that in a lot of cases, unless you wouldn't mind me spending a month or three doing real work testing every time I make something new?

So to help make it easier for me - because it's scary having to face the possibility that, oh, maybe I got one of the 168 variables off by 2% and the whole thing crashes! - let's not go overboard on expectations, shall we? Let's see what happens in real life testing.

Rest assured, I will never release anything this advanced or expensive without being 99% sure it's done right and well worth more than what you pay for it. But still... it's a lot of pressure.

Shannon, you're right.

I'm sorry. Sorry for putting so much pressure on you. I know many others feel the same.

That just isn't it, though. We act this way, because we know what you've done in the past, what you've given us, what you're capable of. So it isn't just pressure to walk on water unfairly, it's also excitement over the future as we've seen what you can do in the past.

Whether I lose my virginity and fix my issues with women at last, with this program, or if not, or with SM3 a second time around, or with SM4 or whatever, I want you to know I appreciate and respect your efforts deeply. And I know that every person that likes this post does as well.

Try to remember it isn't just pressure. It's also faith due to past successes with programs from you, and respect for you.

(05-27-2016, 06:09 PM)Banksy Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 05:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 02:40 PM)Banksy Wrote:

(05-27-2016, 02:19 PM)apollolux Wrote: It sounds like people here feel they lack tact when rejecting others, probably out of GSF. If that's the case, you're probably not ready to be sexually irresistible or a magnet and need to run something else for a bit.

My issue was with potential efficiency problems and I feel Shannon explained his approach and testing methods sufficiently enough that I'm confident he'll get it done satisfactorily.

Maybe, but isn't this program supposed to be used by itself, as in you don't have to run a six stage set before you qualify? This program is also for women, and sometimes tact is not enough, for men and women. And if tact is the issue then tact is what I am requesting, it doesn't come naturally to everyone, as everyone was raised differently.

It may sound arrogant, but I think it's a real concern, especially if there's no foundation building.

And secondly, it was just an opinion.

If tact is not enough, then be assertive. How hard is that? Or am I misunderstanding something?

Maybe it's just my age demographic or where I'm from but when I reject a girl I usually have to face some kind of consequences.