+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 05-26-2016
Seems this new AOSI is very very strong i really have to purchase it before something happens and Shannon decides to nerf it down lol.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 05-26-2016
There won't be a $94.95 early bird discount for us loyal forum members - like the EHPRA2 last time - would there? Just wishful thinking.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 05-26-2016
Quote:There won't be a $94.95 early bird discount for us loyal forum members - like the EHPRA2 last time - would there? Just wishful thinking.
Most likely not, Shannon already said it'd be the same price as E2 currently. That was only for the introduction of 5.5g.
I've already brought AOSI (in my mind atleast hahaha)
Quote:They will be vastly more powerful. On how quickly they affect you, how much they affect you, how deeply they affect you, how well they deal with resistance, how much better they deal with polymorphic ambiguities within the person, how well they guide you to your goal, how quickly they work, how obviously they work, how comfortably they work, etc. etc.
All of that post sounded awesome but what are 'polymorphic ambiguities'?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016
(05-26-2016, 06:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: Alright, so I just did a short run of the predictive models and the answer I get is interesting. The statements in the script of AOSI to prevent and repel undesired attention seem to affect both those who you want to be attracted, and those you don't. Basically, it reduces to a significant degree, the effects of the whole program.
Based on this, I think I am probably going to build it without those limiters. They do what they are intended to do, but the cost for achieving the program's goals is potentially too high. I'll do longer and more detailed runs, but unless they significantly disagree with this run and for good reasons, that's what's most likely.
So does the limiters in BIABW and SM3 also reduces to a significant degree, the effect of the whole program? Or all this is due to the gender neutral statement in the new AOSI?
What was this significant degree, 15%, 30% less effective?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016
(05-26-2016, 10:06 PM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:There won't be a $94.95 early bird discount for us loyal forum members - like the EHPRA2 last time - would there? Just wishful thinking.
Most likely not, Shannon already said it'd be the same price as E2 currently. That was only for the introduction of 5.5g.
I've already brought AOSI (in my mind atleast hahaha)
Quote:They will be vastly more powerful. On how quickly they affect you, how much they affect you, how deeply they affect you, how well they deal with resistance, how much better they deal with polymorphic ambiguities within the person, how well they guide you to your goal, how quickly they work, how obviously they work, how comfortably they work, etc. etc.
All of that post sounded awesome but what are 'polymorphic ambiguities'?
Nope. $114.95 a copy.
Polymorphic ambiguities refer to circumstances that were previously outside the bounds of standard polymorphic scripting to handle with "high resolution". In simpler terms, (sorry, I get stuck in technical mode sometimes) you could say that they will handle the complex and subtle differences between people with a higher degree of accuracy.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016
(05-26-2016, 11:08 PM)Alpha360 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 06:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: Alright, so I just did a short run of the predictive models and the answer I get is interesting. The statements in the script of AOSI to prevent and repel undesired attention seem to affect both those who you want to be attracted, and those you don't. Basically, it reduces to a significant degree, the effects of the whole program.
Based on this, I think I am probably going to build it without those limiters. They do what they are intended to do, but the cost for achieving the program's goals is potentially too high. I'll do longer and more detailed runs, but unless they significantly disagree with this run and for good reasons, that's what's most likely.
So does the limiters in BIABW and SM3 also reduces to a significant degree, the effect of the whole program? Or all this is due to the gender neutral statement in the new AOSI?
It would have nothing to do with the user specified gender statements in AOSI, so I presume it is affecting the other two programs in a similar fashion.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 05-27-2016
No limiters! Great News!
Well.. bad news for my EPHRA2 run lol.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaMind - 05-27-2016
(05-27-2016, 12:27 AM)kenpachi Wrote: No limiters! Great News!
Well.. bad news for my EPHRA2 run lol.
Once AOSI 5.5G released, I'll gladly use it (in the expense of E2) :angel:
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 05-27-2016
(05-27-2016, 12:27 AM)kenpachi Wrote: No limiters! Great News!
Well.. bad news for my EPHRA2 run lol.
(05-27-2016, 01:38 AM)AlphaMind Wrote: Once AOSI 5.5G released, I'll gladly use it (in the expense of E2) :angel:
Perhaps I'm just daft or missing out one something small...but what does using AOSI have anything to do with EPHRA 2?
I only ask because I am now using E 2 and seeing how incredibly ridiculously powerful 5.5G is now I might just jump on AOSI simply because 5.5G is that friggin awesome.
Previously I wasn't even interested in anything attraction related but E 2 has shown me how insane results can be with 5.5G. I'll be using AOSI purely out of curiosity and exploration
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 05-27-2016
E2 and AOSI have nothing to do with each other. It's just that so many E2 users will be tempted to jump aboard AOSI now that it's coming out soon.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Lowe - 05-27-2016
Shannon, will this AOSI aura be recognised by people who do not come into contact with your directly? By this I mean will our presence be felt in pictures / videos / etc.? That would be very neat for those of us who are on dating sites, for example.
I will be jumping aboard the AOSI train as well. I have been on AOS for 2 months but got nothing except some acne (resistance?) and maybe people being friendlier to me. AOSI looks like it will be a major step up.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaMind - 05-27-2016
(05-27-2016, 02:08 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: E2 and AOSI have nothing to do with each other. It's just that so many E2 users will be tempted to jump aboard AOSI now that it's coming out soon.
Yeah, I'm using E2 rite now
(and it's calming as f***!)I'm really agitated with AOSI 5.5G. Gonna go around the town expecting blow-work (at least) LOL
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dE3k - 05-27-2016
oh i cant wait to use AOSI!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 05-27-2016
(05-27-2016, 02:08 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: E2 and AOSI have nothing to do with each other. It's just that so many E2 users will be tempted to jump aboard AOSI now that it's coming out soon.
Ahhh, that makes sense. But thought AOSI was at least 1 - 2 months out? Didn't Shannon say that a single build of 5.5G takes at least a month?
I think we have plenty of time for E 2, even for someone like me who's just started with it