Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Darkness - 05-26-2016

If it doesn't reduce the effect also add OGSF please


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 07:06 PM)CatMan Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 07:04 PM)Shannon Wrote: Just remember, ladies and gents: the greater the power and freedom you have, the more responsibility you bear as a result. Don't get mad at me if you end up with some 12 year old or someone of the wrong gender humping your leg. This is all on you. You asked for it. You chose to run it. You are responsible for the consequences of being irresistibly sexually attractive.

LMAO...that's hilarious!

You do a great job of marketing, Shannon.

Either by design or accident, lol.

Reminds me of Spiderman's Uncle: "With great power, comes great responsibility." haha!

I'm not marketing. I'm also not kidding. I'm covering my ass. If this thing does what the models are suggesting, I'm gonna need it! Of course I'm using a very long term scale of time to view the effects atm, but still. It looks like this is going to be ridiculous.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 07:19 PM)Darkness Wrote: If it doesn't reduce the effect also add OGSF please

Already handled that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016

I am currently tweaking up the SOS. I have five options that all look close to equally awesome. This is challenging. But having that many looking that good, real good sign. Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 05-26-2016

With all the magical new tech in there "ABC" "XYZ" "INXS" "TMZ" "CNN"...it should be insane. I'll call it 5.75G, lol. I can't wait to read about what they do! This one should be legit, Shannon. I'm very excited.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 05-26-2016

Shannon, I'm curious, what does all this new tech mean for programs like AM and SM? Will they be more powerful on changing you as a person? Will the transition be easier and more of a "no brainer" type thing? (I've noticed that my own changes have only come when it made sense to me, till then, I muddled through resistance and vague guesses).

And what about influence? If we can shoulder the responsibility, surely we can have more influence over people, no? (I'm thinking of women, of course. In my own development, I've stumbled across a sort of mind control that I';m sure could be developed if one had the power and the means)


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 07:04 PM)Shannon Wrote: Just remember, ladies and gents: the greater the power and freedom you have, the more responsibility you bear as a result. Don't get mad at me if you end up with some 12 year old or someone of the wrong gender humping your leg. This is all on you. You asked for it. You chose to run it. You are responsible for the consequences of being irresistibly sexually attractive.

As long as those we find do find sexually attractive are acting that way as well, we shouldn't have a problem Tongue


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 07:49 PM)CatMan Wrote: With all the magical new tech in there "ABC" "XYZ" "INXS" "TMZ" "CNN"...it should be insane. I'll call it 5.75G, lol. I can't wait to read about what they do! This one should be legit, Shannon. I'm very excited.

lol Unfortunately, the ones I have referred to by code names are going to remain secret. There are a LOT of them in full 6G format. I expect dozens of them in use at a time in any given full 6G.

5.5G is just a transitionary generation between 5 and 6. I never said it had to have a specific number of 6G technologies in it. Some will have more, some will have less. It will depend on what makes the programs work and what is doable and appropriate.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 08:30 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-26-2016, 07:49 PM)CatMan Wrote: With all the magical new tech in there "ABC" "XYZ" "INXS" "TMZ" "CNN"...it should be insane. I'll call it 5.75G, lol. I can't wait to read about what they do! This one should be legit, Shannon. I'm very excited.

lol Unfortunately, the ones I have referred to by code names are going to remain secret. There are a LOT of them in full 6G format. I expect dozens of them in use at a time in any given full 6G.

5.5G is just a transitionary generation between 5 and 6. I never said it had to have a specific number of 6G technologies in it. Some will have more, some will have less. It will depend on what makes the programs work and what is doable and appropriate.

Fair enough. I just remember you doing the write up for EHPRA 2.0 with descriptions of them. Maybe you will in time. It's fun to see huge jumps in power like this. Must be fun to finally be able to implement some of it.

I get that, I was just kidding around, haha.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 07:56 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, I'm curious, what does all this new tech mean for programs like AM and SM? Will they be more powerful on changing you as a person? Will the transition be easier and more of a "no brainer" type thing? (I've noticed that my own changes have only come when it made sense to me, till then, I muddled through resistance and vague guesses).

And what about influence? If we can shoulder the responsibility, surely we can have more influence over people, no? (I'm thinking of women, of course. In my own development, I've stumbled across a sort of mind control that I';m sure could be developed if one had the power and the means)

They will be vastly more powerful. On how quickly they affect you, how much they affect you, how deeply they affect you, how well they deal with resistance, how much better they deal with polymorphic ambiguities within the person, how well they guide you to your goal, how quickly they work, how obviously they work, how comfortably they work, etc. etc.

I take it you're suggesting that I put something in the AOIS script to get people to respond by taking responsibility for acting on their desires? Not a bad idea, let's see if that works.

Just finished tweaking up the SOS. It's not at absolute maximum optimization, but given how many options I had to go through to get it this tweaked up and optimized, and how close it is to absolute maximum, I'll take it. It's 2/37ths below absolute maximum right now. Pretty damned close.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - apollolux - 05-26-2016

For AOSI, is there even any possible way to make the attraction and/or irresistibility any more obvious than it already does? ASC was pretty fcking good about that and that was only about non-specific confidence, and so far the 4G BIABWS+AOS combo seems to be effective if I've been reading the signals properly, so short of a woman undressing herself and attempting to envelope my cock is it even possible to make signals more obvious?

I know a lot of it has to do with my own confidence and willingness to escalate, so maybe women are picking up on that more positively? If so, feel free to emphasize that, Shannon. Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 05-26-2016

Shannon, I know you must have already thought about it, how sexiness can ignite fear and repel the very people who find you sexy. Too sexy to handle. So is there, or will there be a module where others feel safe & secure around you, and feel free to express their sexuality?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 08:47 PM)apollolux Wrote: For AOSI, is there even any possible way to make the attraction and/or irresistibility any more obvious than it already does? ASC was pretty fcking good about that and that was only about non-specific confidence, and so far the 4G BIABWS+AOS combo seems to be effective if I've been reading the signals properly, so short of a woman undressing herself and attempting to envelope my cock is it even possible to make signals more obvious?

I know a lot of it has to do with my own confidence and willingness to escalate, so maybe women are picking up on that more positively? If so, feel free to emphasize that, Shannon. Big Grin

Already in there.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-26-2016

(05-26-2016, 08:47 PM)LeonidasXVI Wrote: Shannon, I know you must have already thought about it, how sexiness can ignite fear and repel the very people who find you sexy. Too sexy to handle. So is there, or will there be a module where others feel safe & secure around you, and feel free to express their sexuality?

Already in there.