Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jakeb203 - 03-09-2016

Limitless is of course a good idea. Of course you would enjoy the benefit of having every women attracted to you. But would you love it if you have all your cousins want to sleep with you, and all gay guys pinching your butt very time tou walk by? It fuckin' grosses me out and quite regularly this happens.

I love women, but I don't want to attract my cousins. And I need to see them often each year, just like all of you need to see your family too. You cannot neglect realistic issues here. If you were talking about "free will", "make your own decisions", that sounds too good as if you have zero attachment with your family. it's funny how you all have this "limitless" mentality without focusing on realistic measures. I am simply saying that "make SM / AM filter out women who are close family members" , period. I don't give a shit if you sleep with random Cougars on the street.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 03-09-2016

(03-09-2016, 08:55 AM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Limitless is of course a good idea. Of course you would enjoy the benefit of having every women attracted to you. But would you love it if you have all your cousins want to sleep with you, and all gay guys pinching your butt very time tou walk by? It fuckin' grosses me out and quite regularly this happens.

I love women, but I don't want to attract my cousins. And I need to see them often each year, just like all of you need to see your family too. You cannot neglect realistic issues here. If you were talking about "free will", "make your own decisions", that sounds too good as if you have zero attachment with your family. it's funny how you all have this "limitless" mentality without focusing on realistic measures. I am simply saying that "make SM / AM filter out women who are close family members" , period. I don't give a shit if you sleep with random Cougars on the street.

I had a cousin attracted to me during AM 6, she even offered to spend a night in a hotel room. I said, "No." And that was that. If your cousins are attracted, or make you an offer, say no and continue your merry way. It is simple. It is your choice to let it bother you or not.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 03-09-2016

Is TLAM getting an upgrade to 5g ?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-09-2016

(03-09-2016, 09:48 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: Is TLAM getting an upgrade to 5g ?

Eventually.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-09-2016

(03-09-2016, 08:55 AM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Limitless is of course a good idea. Of course you would enjoy the benefit of having every women attracted to you. But would you love it if you have all your cousins want to sleep with you, and all gay guys pinching your butt very time tou walk by? It fuckin' grosses me out and quite regularly this happens.

I love women, but I don't want to attract my cousins. And I need to see them often each year, just like all of you need to see your family too. You cannot neglect realistic issues here. If you were talking about "free will", "make your own decisions", that sounds too good as if you have zero attachment with your family. it's funny how you all have this "limitless" mentality without focusing on realistic measures. I am simply saying that "make SM / AM filter out women who are close family members" , period. I don't give a shit if you sleep with random Cougars on the street.

An attractive, self realized man is going to have to deal with those terrible first-world problems they have about being an attractive self realized man.

Limitless means you take responsibility for the freedoms you have. In this case, all you have to do is set a boundary, and you're done.

Take it as a compliment that they are attracted, but set your boundaries firmly and then hold your ground. Simple.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 03-09-2016

I would fuck a distant relative if shes hot and it doesnt come out.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 03-09-2016

How much more effective will future subliminals be at external manifestations ? Will manifesting friends, money, an amazing life, better body, etc....easier ? Most of our favorite subliminals are heavily focused on internal & self changes. I'd love to see some heavily focused on external ( reality, circumstances, lifestyle ) changes. Thats what we ultimately seek.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 03-09-2016

I personally don't like the thought of it limiting all kinds of things, where does the limitation stop? Is it that difficult not to fuck all your cousins? haha


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 03-09-2016

(03-09-2016, 04:25 PM)Benjamin Wrote: I personally don't like the thought of it limiting all kinds of things, where does the limitation stop? Is it that difficult not to **** all your cousins? haha

Maybe he has a hot family.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Benjamin - 03-09-2016

hahaha


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bliss - 03-09-2016

(03-09-2016, 04:25 PM)Benjamin Wrote: I personally don't like the thought of it limiting all kinds of things, where does the limitation stop? Is it that difficult not to **** all your cousins? haha

Lol I agree


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-09-2016

(03-09-2016, 12:27 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: How much more effective will future subliminals be at external manifestations ? Will manifesting friends, money, an amazing life, better body, etc....easier ? Most of our favorite subliminals are heavily focused on internal & self changes. I'd love to see some heavily focused on external ( reality, circumstances, lifestyle ) changes. Thats what we ultimately seek.

That remains to be seen, doesn't it. I can't magically know ahead of time with enough accuracy to be able to say, "Oh, 173.985% more effective."


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spareness - 03-09-2016

(03-08-2016, 03:47 AM)sushi521 Wrote:
(03-07-2016, 10:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-07-2016, 09:43 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon do you think it would benefit me if I bought more high quality speakers? I'm already getting results so I know my speakers are working but they're laptop speakers from 2006 so Idk maybe I could do better lol.

Oh no, speakers from 2006? They must be out of date! Quick, get new ones!

Seriously? lol If you have speakers that pass the speaker test, you're fine.

Quote:And so that your answer can benefit more people: do better speakers make a difference in results? Or is it like, as long as its working then there's nothing beyond that point?

Higher frequency response on the top end is better at reproducing the ultrasonic audio with higher fidelity, and therefore gives you slightly better results. Slightly.

Quote:Also do different audio programs make a difference, ignoring effects you can toggle on or off? Edit: but also would any effects help results?

They do indeed. I use Audacity on my laptop. VLC also works well. I don't know any others, so I can't comment, but I can say that WMP (which I hear is deprecated in W10) was terrible for playing subliminals.

Effects help results? What effects? Reverb? You don't want reverb.

Confused I've been using WMP the whole time.
So I downloaded Audacity, and it looks pretty complicated. Do you need to change any setting or you just play it?

Audacity is indeed at first glance looks a bit complicated. But the truth is as simple and easy as any other media player. The difference is in the Audacity audio plays using shortcuts rather than the mouse. Maybe it's to make easier for users, (perhaps) because actually Audacity is a sound editor. Try to read the manual on how to use Audacity to play audio. After using Audacity a few times it will become second nature to play audio using Audacity. I myself am a little surprised because it is very easy and simple.

The drawback is Audacity eat quite a lot of RAM and will lag on my computer. So I prefer to use VLC when I'm using Windows. I most often use Audacity when I'm using Linux. What I like about Audacity is due to differences in how to play the audio in Audacity and also due to some reasons. Wink

VLC is great because it is multifunctional, as well as simple as Audacity, can be minimized to the system tray and also consumes less RAM than Audacity.

If you are using a computer that has a relatively low specification, try using Audacious. It is the default audio player in Lubuntu. Very light. I've tried it and so far so good. Its a bit I do not like is the part that I think the volume slider is less user-friendly. You can also install it on Windows. This audio player has never been tested by Shannon. So it's your own risk, to give it a try.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dubls - 03-09-2016

Anybody use iTunes for playback on a Mac?

Didn't hear any distortion in the speaker test off of built-in Mac speakers