Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-06-2016

(03-06-2016, 11:03 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(03-05-2016, 09:21 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: But what I was saying isn't about doubting subs or having a perfect childhood, it was about not knowing how far the "as above, so below" claims can be taken. To this day I still have some things that happen even though my beliefs contradict them.

All I'm saying is, if it were as simple as you put it, that would NOT be the case.

Focusing on the limitations creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of.. well, self-limiting. I have an idea of how far it could go theoretically, but it's one of those things where you focus on where you're currently at and how to break past that level.

You won't know how far you can go until you get there, and trying to figure it at your current level of understanding will harm you in the long run. To get to where I want to be in life, I had to teach myself to enjoy the journey rather than focus on the end game. That way, instead of thinking, "what can I get from this," I now focus on what I have.

And the abundance keeps flowing because internally, I feel I'm at a higher state that hasn't quite manifested on the physical realm yet. But, because I KNOW it's coming, it'll come. Which is interesting because I never thought like this before AM6 -- which I'm thinking is the result of the slipstream technology?

As for your claims of contradicting beliefs, I think you're still confused about the difference between subconscious beliefs and conscious thought.

It would be a combination of slipstream and thrown anchor. I call the technique where I have you project part of your awareness into the ideal future where you have already accomplished the goal, the "thrown anchor technique" because it's like throwing an anchor to where you want to go, and then pulling yourself there.

Sarge, you're limiting yourself by thinking in absolutes. If X then Y doesn't apply the way you want to think it does in this case. It works because there are shades of gray and complexities beyond hat you're allowing yourself to see or accept. And whether or not you want to see or accept it, it does work, and those of us who can and will open our eyes and minds to it, experience it, and use and benefit from it every day.

So from that, we can logically deduce that all of us who use it are delusional, or you are at some level afraid of accepting the idea that maybe this is the truth for some reason.

You seem to be strongly self sabotaging in a lot of ways. This, I think, is one of them. But hey, I don't think we will ever see eye to eye, so enjoy what you have and chive on.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 03-06-2016

(03-06-2016, 11:36 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-06-2016, 11:03 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(03-05-2016, 09:21 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: But what I was saying isn't about doubting subs or having a perfect childhood, it was about not knowing how far the "as above, so below" claims can be taken. To this day I still have some things that happen even though my beliefs contradict them.

All I'm saying is, if it were as simple as you put it, that would NOT be the case.

Focusing on the limitations creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of.. well, self-limiting. I have an idea of how far it could go theoretically, but it's one of those things where you focus on where you're currently at and how to break past that level.

You won't know how far you can go until you get there, and trying to figure it at your current level of understanding will harm you in the long run. To get to where I want to be in life, I had to teach myself to enjoy the journey rather than focus on the end game. That way, instead of thinking, "what can I get from this," I now focus on what I have.

And the abundance keeps flowing because internally, I feel I'm at a higher state that hasn't quite manifested on the physical realm yet. But, because I KNOW it's coming, it'll come. Which is interesting because I never thought like this before AM6 -- which I'm thinking is the result of the slipstream technology?

As for your claims of contradicting beliefs, I think you're still confused about the difference between subconscious beliefs and conscious thought.

It would be a combination of slipstream and thrown anchor. I call the technique where I have you project part of your awareness into the ideal future where you have already accomplished the goal, the "thrown anchor technique" because it's like throwing an anchor to where you want to go, and then pulling yourself there.

Shannon hey Smile, i've notice through my journey that sensation of feelings a lot. I would say on a regular basis almost all the time. It's definitely part of the growth but I was wondering if there are other techniques u incorporate that we can have knowledge on? I want to know if over the years I listen to a program again will this be more powerful such as multiple runs of a six stage set or is it always based on present factors in the mind. If you could provide an answer that would be greatSmile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 03-07-2016

(03-06-2016, 01:54 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-06-2016, 04:20 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Hey Shannon, I need some advice which sub order will attract sexual partners quicker.

I'm currently doing AM6. Deciding whether to use MYPSL or SM3 first. I've been doing cold approaching for a year now. I've had dozens of dates, couple of make outs, but still yet to pull the trigger to go sexual. Regardless of the future results, I'll still be using both subs - it's just the matter of which I'm gonna use first.

From what I know, MYPSL is more manifestation-orientated, that it doesn't really help advance your skillset, and just does a good job at attracting whatever girl is perfect for you at the given point in time. Whereas SM3 is more focused on approaching and seducing girls, and then in the latter stages turning the tables, having the girls approach us - but it doesn't necessarily guarantee a sexual lover by the end of it. Am I right regarding the comparison of the two?

I'm thinking since I still lack sexual experience, if I use MYPSL first, I can get more experience in that department handled asap. It should guarantee more confidence and I'll be able to have a more successful run with SM3 afterwards.

It's not cause I'm impatient. More like I wanna be efficient and get over this hurdle the sooner the better.

Later on, after 2-3 runs of SM3, I am definitely interested in using other MYP subs (the active manifestors sound promising).

If anybody else has any advice or input to add, please feel free to. Thanks. Smile

First, neither one guarantees a success. That always depends on factors outside my control.

I advise you to use SM3 after AM6 to get the best outcome.

Thanks Shannon. Yeah after thinking about it, it makes sense to use SM3, cause it'll further my development.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Vincent_Vega - 03-07-2016

So FLAC will only be included in the newly built ones, right?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-07-2016

(03-06-2016, 11:53 PM)Ultralight Beam Wrote:
(03-06-2016, 11:36 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-06-2016, 11:03 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(03-05-2016, 09:21 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: But what I was saying isn't about doubting subs or having a perfect childhood, it was about not knowing how far the "as above, so below" claims can be taken. To this day I still have some things that happen even though my beliefs contradict them.

All I'm saying is, if it were as simple as you put it, that would NOT be the case.

Focusing on the limitations creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of.. well, self-limiting. I have an idea of how far it could go theoretically, but it's one of those things where you focus on where you're currently at and how to break past that level.

You won't know how far you can go until you get there, and trying to figure it at your current level of understanding will harm you in the long run. To get to where I want to be in life, I had to teach myself to enjoy the journey rather than focus on the end game. That way, instead of thinking, "what can I get from this," I now focus on what I have.

And the abundance keeps flowing because internally, I feel I'm at a higher state that hasn't quite manifested on the physical realm yet. But, because I KNOW it's coming, it'll come. Which is interesting because I never thought like this before AM6 -- which I'm thinking is the result of the slipstream technology?

As for your claims of contradicting beliefs, I think you're still confused about the difference between subconscious beliefs and conscious thought.

It would be a combination of slipstream and thrown anchor. I call the technique where I have you project part of your awareness into the ideal future where you have already accomplished the goal, the "thrown anchor technique" because it's like throwing an anchor to where you want to go, and then pulling yourself there.

Shannon hey Smile, i've notice through my journey that sensation of feelings a lot. I would say on a regular basis almost all the time. It's definitely part of the growth but I was wondering if there are other techniques u incorporate that we can have knowledge on? I want to know if over the years I listen to a program again will this be more powerful such as multiple runs of a six stage set or is it always based on present factors in the mind. If you could provide an answer that would be greatSmile

Not sure I understand your question. But those factors I can share I do.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-07-2016

(03-07-2016, 11:03 AM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: So FLAC will only be included in the newly built ones, right?

The FLACs are derived directly from the WAV audio stream I create. That means they're pristine. But each one of these single stage builts takes about 20-25 gigabytes of space on my disk. Even with a 512 GB hard disk, it has to be cleared away. So I keep the FLAC and MP3 and erase the build files and WAVs. That means that to create the FLACs for anything previous, I have to rebuild it, which I cannot afford the time to do for such a small improvement.

Going forward, there will be FLACs.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 03-07-2016

(03-07-2016, 02:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-07-2016, 11:03 AM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: So FLAC will only be included in the newly built ones, right?

The FLACs are derived directly from the WAV audio stream I create. That means they're pristine. But each one of these single stage builts takes about 20-25 gigabytes of space on my disk. Even with a 512 GB hard disk, it has to be cleared away. So I keep the FLAC and MP3 and erase the build files and WAVs. That means that to create the FLACs for anything previous, I have to rebuild it, which I cannot afford the time to do for such a small improvement.

Going forward, there will be FLACs.

Well if you're going to start using flac, samsung just created the biggest ssd drive to date. I'd recommend an ssd drive over hard drive the speed of file transfers are so fast.

http://www.engadget.com/2016/03/03/samsung-16tb-ssd-shipping/


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-07-2016

(03-07-2016, 03:25 PM)lokko Wrote:
(03-07-2016, 02:16 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-07-2016, 11:03 AM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: So FLAC will only be included in the newly built ones, right?

The FLACs are derived directly from the WAV audio stream I create. That means they're pristine. But each one of these single stage builts takes about 20-25 gigabytes of space on my disk. Even with a 512 GB hard disk, it has to be cleared away. So I keep the FLAC and MP3 and erase the build files and WAVs. That means that to create the FLACs for anything previous, I have to rebuild it, which I cannot afford the time to do for such a small improvement.

Going forward, there will be FLACs.

Well if you're going to start using flac, samsung just created the biggest ssd drive to date. I'd recommend an ssd drive over hard drive the speed of file transfers are so fast.

http://www.engadget.com/2016/03/03/samsung-16tb-ssd-shipping/

My computer currently runs on an SSD, 512 GB. It's about 7x faster than the fastest spinning drive I had before it, which is to say it is no longer painful to wait for read/write operations on the large amounts of data I work with. But I certainly would not mind having that beast. 15.35 TB of course would necessitate a considerable expenditure for the drive, and then I would have the joy of creating a RAID array for it's backup. I suspect the cost of all this is not currently feasible. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 03-07-2016

Will my second run of all six stages of SM be stronger because I've run it once before. Does it just build off my current progress?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 03-07-2016

(03-07-2016, 04:31 PM)Ultralight Beam Wrote: Will my second run of all six stages of SM be stronger because I've run it once before. Does it just build off my current progress?


Basically, yes it will. It is like running AM 3-4 times in a row. The more you run it, the more that program can sink into your mind to become automatic.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 03-07-2016

I mean that's what I assumed and I will be re running these programs for years to come but I would like a bit more detail. Just, would the program come across as stronger or pronounced? can we expect new results or effects from stages as our minds have accepted the programming once already.

I guess I can wait and see but getting more insight would be helpful


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 03-07-2016

(03-07-2016, 05:23 PM)Ultralight Beam Wrote: I mean that's what I assumed and I will be re running these programs for years to come but I would like a bit more detail. Just, would the program come across as stronger or pronounced? can we expect new results or effects from stages as our minds have accepted the programming once already.

I guess I can wait and see but getting more insight would be helpful

My second run of AM6 thus far has been both stronger and more pronounced. Optimus Engine is kicking in with a vengeance. I've never had so much motivation to go to the gym / do martial arts in my entire life. Sometimes, working out, making money and educating myself is all I can think about. This didn't happen in the first run. First run was six months of curling up in a ball and hating my life, hahaha.

Weird thing was, I felt masochistic -- it hurt, but it... hurt really good? My guess is that the first run brought me out of the depths of omegahood. Second run is actually doing what the sub intended, considering how low I was in the beginning. After this, it's EPHRA 2.0 for three months and then a third run... unless Ultimate Writer is available.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-07-2016

You don't clear a lot for building in one pass. First you knock down the trees, then you clear out the brush, then you rip out the roots. Likewise, you can only make so much progress in one pass with growth. But for those who are willing to stick to it and cooperate, the results are there. The programs are designed to build on themselves from one pass to another yes.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 03-07-2016

Ok thank you. And I'll be here to update on the contrast