(08-09-2015, 01:18 AM)Ricardo Wrote: I'm having a hard time understanding how you can want to pay $1000 for 2x sub programs that will potentially give you all you want, commit to the timings for two years then resist the s**t out of them so you get no results!
Guero committed the finances and time, along with a deep desire for the changes, so I'm at a loss how he would be resisting them so strongly. If you want something really bad, don't you open yourself up to it?
If someone gives me $1000 out of the kindness of their heart, am I really going to to fling it back in their face and tell them to f**k off??
Firstly, we are taking him at his word that he used the correctly and consistently. There have been some questions raised as to if he actually did, but presuming that he did, you must never forget the biggest problem I have with making these programs work for everyone:
1. The conscious and subconscious minds can, and frequently do disagree, and
2. When they disagree, the subconscious mind will ALWAYS win out, and
3. The subconscious mind is not rational beyond doing what it believes is the desired programming.
So a person can potentially consciously want to change and genuinely try to change, and their subconscious mind can potentially sabotage and resist that change at the same time. You see it all the time, and it's rampant in the United States right now with people who are addicted to drugs, overweight, smoking, etc. etc.
Given the right combination of personality/physiology/subconscious programming/fears/conscious beliefs, it is possible for a very small percentage of the populace to succeed in achieving a state of consciously unintentional/subconsciously intentional failure through flat resisting the program while genuinely trying to change, even using these programs. I estimate that for the 5G stuff that is less than 1% of the population.
It really has nothing to do with logic. It has to do with what seems to invariably boil down to fear, and fear is an emotional response, and emotions are by their very nature irrational. So it is indeed possible for a person who even seems to be perfectly rational to fail out of fear, because not every aspect of them is rational.
Where we get into out of bounds is when we have this happen and the person comes back and attacks us for their experience. Presuming, of course, that they did use it correctly.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!