09-17-2010, 05:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-17-2010, 05:51 AM by WildFlower.)
I personally believe that hair loss is caused by skull expansion. This explains why some people, like myself, recede to an NWII then stay there, others start loosing it from the back, other from the front, others experience a gradual thinning all over the 'pattern' area. I think it comes down simply to head shape and how hormones influence bone remodelling in the skull. I can't conceive that each individual hair has a genetic predisposition towards a certain fate. I am personally sceptical about what physical changes subs can make but I'm still interested in seeing if this sub does work for those testing it.
How do you define an NWIII? I know it can be very subjective. I go of that if the temple is in line with the front of the side-burn it is an NWII; if it is in line with the back of the side-burn it is an NWIII
Quote:Since the age of 18 I started to show signs of male pattern baldness, and it doesn't help that it runs in both families. On the Norwood scale I'm a NWIII.
How do you define an NWIII? I know it can be very subjective. I go of that if the temple is in line with the front of the side-burn it is an NWII; if it is in line with the back of the side-burn it is an NWIII
“To be normal is the ideal aim of the unsuccessful.” - Carl Jung