Skeptics come in a few different flavors. Some are skeptical, but open, and they see fairly normal results. Then there's the skeptics who are resistant and they tend to need more time to see results because they are resisting the effects.
Then there are the antagonistic skeptics, who are only trying the subs to be able to say they tried them, but they have neither any intention of letting them work, nor using the properly (in most cases) and they get very little results. (As you might expect.) They are out to "disprove" everything.
For someone who is just normal in skepticism, as you seem to be, you might see it take a little longer, but it'll still work, even if you turn out to be resistant and need more time.
Then there are the antagonistic skeptics, who are only trying the subs to be able to say they tried them, but they have neither any intention of letting them work, nor using the properly (in most cases) and they get very little results. (As you might expect.) They are out to "disprove" everything.
For someone who is just normal in skepticism, as you seem to be, you might see it take a little longer, but it'll still work, even if you turn out to be resistant and need more time.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
