All Bulls**t Aside, Who's Actually Getting Laid with DMSI

[Have at ye]

I'm beginning to think you're just trying to goad Shannon into working on DMSI faster.

We'll get there.

I'm totally antsy about the next iteration myself, as I believe myself to be executing the darn thing pretty well recently - and as far as I can see, there's a couple of adjustments/additions that need to be made, and I believe they shall be made in that next version.

Anyroad, main issue that's occurred, as I see it, with DMSI's development is that there was a pretty numerous group of people that were reporting positive falsehoods in order to, I dunno, really - steer the development in a direction they personally wanted it to go? As they were unable to actually comprehend and/or believe that DMSI's goals are at all possible? Or maybe they were just scared on some level of what it would actually entail? And it may have had led to certain decisions that were counterproductive (f. in. removing the anti-sniper module), and it most definitely wasted a *lot* of everyone's time.

Because, as far as I can tell right now (still running it), it's *extremely* unexpected as to what the program's driving at, for me at least.