05-22-2018, 12:19 PM
(05-21-2018, 05:21 PM)DarkPlouf Wrote:(05-21-2018, 04:28 PM)Shannon Wrote: and for you to be laboring under this delusion is almost comical given how readily available and repeated proof to the contrary is all around you.That's my line... We aren't observing the same proofs then...You're the one mentioning black and white thinking and yet you state a lot of absolutes in your posts. Not all women are alike. I am not a womanizer but I know this much.
I am just saying covering both fronts (love and sex) is likely to score more points then just one.
DMSI focuses on sex only and as we are seeing it isn't enough to generate genuine interest in the targets. If women see a DMSI user as just another walking dick no wonder they flake or make no effort at all to genuinely connect. Of course there's fear and so many other reasons but sometimes it can be because they lack any genuine interest. "meh it's just another dick. Why would I go outta my way to chase? ".
Something like that... Does that sounds crazy?
If Romance isn't compatible with DMSI then anything else that helps to connect is better... It's just that love is a powerful and driving energy.
Not sure about a Romance only DMSI, I don't see the point of excluding sex all together.
It sounds to me like you are wanting to introduce romance to take advantage of people sexually. If the goal isn't romance and sex, then that's what you're essentially doing. I'm not down with that.
DMSI is designed the way it is because it's not promising the affected X (in this case romance) and then taking advantage of them for Y (sex). It's designed to get the affected to want to have sex with you so much that they try to. And it doesn't include romance because that was not the design goal and will require a lot of adjustment to the script. I'm not going to spend another year or two on DMSI.
What we are dealing with is fear of achieving the goal. From the users and those being affected. The issue isn't love or romance. It's fear.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!