dmsi 3.2 poll

[Shannon]

Point #1: DMSI is about sex. Sex and love are not the same thing. You can include love in some types of sex, and it isn't part of others. This program isn't about love. The goal is erotic sex. Not romantic sex.

But love inevitably leads to sex, right ? I mean, when there's love, down the road there's sex always.

No. There's not. There are forms of love that have absolutely nothing to do with sex, even between people who are not blood related or a gender preference mismatch.

You can fall in love with someone in a purely romantic sense, and never have sex get involved. You can have romance and sex combined... and you can have purely erotic love that results in sex, but no romance. I know this from personal experience.

That's a mean to sex so why wouldn't DMSI use it ?

Because it's not a means to sex. It can be combined with sexual love, but romance != sex.

I don't think it's that absurd to include such parameter, especially for women that NEEDS love to open themselves.

Women don't need love to open themselves. Most of them prefer it, but it is not necessary for sex to happen, and for you to be laboring under this delusion is almost comical given how readily available and repeated proof to the contrary is all around you.

Btw I've just read the testimonial of the guy that had the most successful AoS/BIATBW results and he reports women falling in love with him a lot. And fast. Doesn't that contribute to his success ?

It may or may not increase the responses of women to have sex if we include romance. But guess what? This program isn't aimed at romance, it's aimed at achieving pure, raw sexual attraction. Thus the name: Develop Maximum SEXUAL Irresistibility.

Also I've been wondering. DMSI is about sex and only sex, right ? Don't women that flake on guys like JackOfHearts described, do so because, well they don't give a **** ? I mean in this day and age it's soooo easy to find an outlet for sexual satisfaction, especially when you're female. Don't they flake because they know they can get sex with XYZ other men anytime they want ? So why going all the way for JackOfHearts instead of X, Y or Z that are already in the "sweet spot" zone and that do not require any deep shit to get laid with ?

Women flake for a lot of reasons, the cheifest among them being that they can. Nobody penalizes them, and any attempt to do so fails because there's always another dick waiting in line. They get what they want regardless. Has nothing to do with DMSI. DMSI is setting you up to be that special someone she can't find again, and knows it - and therefore values, and indulges her desires to have sex with. Provided, of course, that we execute.

So it seems they don't have any good reason to "go all the way" for Jack...Otherwise they would, right ?

That's man-think for you. Black and white over-simplification of a very shades of gray complex situation. There can be a thousand and one reasons, and they don't have to make any logical sense at all. I have been working on an aphrodisiac for 15+ years now, and there are literally hundreds of factors that I have discovered that factor into her decision to have sex with him or not. Even with this program adjusting all of them to what they need to be, I still cannot get it to work consistently. Why? Because even though we have found and decoded hundreds of factors, there are still more I have not found and dealt with yet.

Now when it comes to love...good luck finding an outlet for the man that touch you in the heart...And same thing for men of course.
Just some thoughts.

There may or may not be a version of DMSI that includes or focuses on romance, but if there is, it will not happen until after DMSI is finished. That is a significant re-write of the script.