dmsi 3.2 poll

[Shannon]

This is old, but if using universal love / heart energy is not compatible with the goals of this sub

The other day a female acquaintance was talking about how she met a sexy guy and she simply couldn't keep him out of his mind. She thought he did something strange to her as she kept getting plagued by the thoughts of him.
Then she said something along those lines: "Thankfully I just have naughty feelings for him, so it's easy to deal with. If they were sweet feelings I really don't know what I'd do.... I'd have to chase him".

This made me think hard and I was wondering if love isn't what truly touch women and make them interested as ****. Love tend to make human very weak and vulnerable.

Yeah Love energy is super powerful especially unconditional love. Nothing more powerful than to hold a frame of genuine unconditional love towards self and others, no matter what is going on. That is true power.

Watch and see, when Shannon decides down the line to create something like DMSI but based on LOVE. You'll all see the difference.

I just wish Shannon read more Abraham Hicks books, like:

"Ask And It Is Given by Esther and Jerry Hicks"

"The Vortex: Where the Law of Attraction Assembles All Cooperative Relationships"

I know he could improve his subliminal's and prevent resistance in people if he fully understood the Abraham Hicks teachings.

I feel that Shannon's cup is full and would dismiss a different way of looking at things, unfortunately.

Point #1: DMSI is about sex. Sex and love are not the same thing. You can include love in some types of sex, and it isn't part of others. This program isn't about love. The goal is erotic sex. Not romantic sex.

Point #2: The program already gives instructions for you to use the optimus engine to modulate the aura to make yourself approachable in whatever ways are required by the individual being affected.

Point #3: Abraham Hicks isn't the only game out there. I've also studied the teachings of Michael and Seth, among others. That does not mean that their teachings are always useful in cases like this, or that they are not already being used. What is useful is being used; what is not, is not. I take inspiration from many sources, but only use what is useful.