Given up on BASE...what next?

[Shannon]

If you guys think BASE 2.1 is "
lacking" or blaming it for some negative effect, you have to remember that:

1. It is a set of instructions. Nothing more, nothing less.
2. You are responsible for executing those instructions.

If you don't execute, the results will seem "lacking". If you reverse execute, which happens when you are absolutely terrified of executing that particular thing you are reversing, then you will get a reversal result, which is a great excuse to stop using the program.

But through all of it...

1. It is a set of instructions. Nothing more, nothing less.
2. You are responsible for executing those instructions.

So I'd say you need to clear something out before BASE will achieve it's goals.

If they are just "a set of instructions" that it doesn't work to "set it and forget it" because it's then like you have a set of instructions for working out or a workout video and you just press play.

In my opinion it's more than a set of instructions. It's more like a computer program that you try to run. Maybe you have to close the running program "resistance" or make enough resources free to run it. Maybe it takes a lot of time to load so you don't see it working. You see nothing and your computer/mind/results might be getting slow/worse. By giving it more time the probability that it will work will rise. Also we as a user should make enough resources free that it can run.

Speaking as an ex programmer, what do you suppose a computer program is? It's a set of instructions.

The program loads in less than 20 minutes on the first loop the first time you ever play it. And if it needed more resources, you would experience either intense exhaustion, intense hunger, or both - ala DMSI.

The issue boils down, 100%, to personal responsibility in choosing to execute it or not. The only exceptions would be in a case like DMSI where there is literally not enough energy, or in the case that the subconscious mind does not, will not or cannot believe that it is possible to achieve the goals.

This contradicts the "anything is possible" scripting, which leaves us with again intentionally resisting, or intentionally giving up. Which is possible to explain because we may have a cause where the demands of the instructions are beyond what the subconscious can maintain without more rest (which shows up as executing for a time, and then failure to execute when the subconscious becomes exhausted and gives up trying).

That case has only happened on MLS 3.0 and only once or twice. That was not the case in this situation, as far as I understand it. I will correct the ASRB by adding a second dimension to it, which should correct that issue. But for everything else, it still boils down to...

choosing to execute or not.