06-17-2017, 11:22 AM
(06-16-2017, 09:55 PM)Rayhon Wrote:(06-11-2017, 03:19 PM)Shannon Wrote: When I give you guys a specific number of loops per day to use the program, it is not a suggestion. It's me trying to nail down a variable that otherwise would make it harder for me to get data and harder for you to get good results. If you disregard my INSTRUCTIONS (not suggestions) you are actually less likely to get good results, and I am less likely to be able to extract useful data from observing you use it, which means the next version won't be as good as it might have been.
I thought were allowed to go over 2 loops now. "let your mind guide you and choose how many loops you do" I read something like that like two weeks ago.
I had good results with 8 loops the last few times. (but i used 2 loops for 80 days or more)
When I change the instructions, they change.
When I changed the instructions, you are now free to use whatever you like. I am comparing the results you get to what I previously stated. You are being entertained by exploring more options.
This is why I will be implementing auto-config in 3.2. I can't model my instructions for everyone individually. I can model the number of loops etc. for the majority, but not the whole. So next version, you will be configuring the program yourself.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!