(03-01-2017, 06:44 PM)RisingSon Wrote:(03-01-2017, 06:04 PM)RTBoss Wrote:(03-01-2017, 05:37 PM)RisingSon Wrote:(03-01-2017, 05:24 PM)RTBoss Wrote: You and your fascination with urine.
I simply use the tools that are given me.
Tap water works well in that instance, smh.
Ask any Special Forces Commando and they will say pee on it! Beyond effective field medicine.
"Other cases could be far more urgent. In about 1550 the Italian doctor Leonardo Fioravanti saw a man's nose sliced off in an argument, and promptly urinated on the fallen organ before stitching it back on. Henry VIII's surgeon Thomas Vicary recommended that all battle wounds should be washed in urine; and others advised the same for potentially gangrenous ulcers, or poisonous bites and stings. Being sterile when it leaves the body, urine was then a far safer cleaning agent than the kind of water typically available."
I've already looked into it. They say, "If there's not a water source available, it's better than nothing."
You're not in the field, and certainly not a medical professional, and have a clean water source available. What is your educational background, anyway? Just curious.
I was telling my wife about your "medical opinion" (she has a Doctor of Nursing Practice, when she receives mail it says Dr. RTB, not Mrs. RTB) and she could only shake her head. If you like, I can call up my best friend, a cardiac anesthesiologist for the past 8 years. We'll see what he thinks.
Listen, you do what you want, but if you're going to say use urine and then make it seem like it's a good idea and people who are reading your journal should try it...Well, a guy like me is going to say something.
