Better Results: Masked Subs OR UltraSonic Subs?

[Shannon]

The quality and results of each is identical (the best I can make), but the limitations of the format itself will cause one difference that must be considered.

In an ultrasonic subliminal versus a masked subliminal, the major differences are the volume and pitch of the script audio. Masked subliminals do not attempt to adjust pitch, but use volume differencing to confuse the conscious mind into ignoring the script, which is what makes it subliminal. The masked subliminal script audio is therefore much lower volume than the ultrasonic subliminal calibrated to the same volume, since the ultrasonic subliminal script audio can be played directly at the same volume as the masking audio is played for the masked subliminal, without being heard. This is because the pitch is higher.

So the result is that ultrasonic script audio (which is the meat and potatoes of the subliminal) will be audible to the subconscious mind as far away as the masking track would be for a masked subliminal, but the same will not hold true for the masked subliminal's script audio. You must be closer to the speakers for the masked version to function reliably. At normal audio, an averaged size room is fine for either format as played on speakers. If you want to go further away and still have some effect, or you want to play your masked program lower than average volume on speakers, you will get different results because the subliminal script audio is lower volume. This must be taken into account.

So: play the program at the same volume as any other audio you would play, over speakers, in a normal sized room in which you can hear the masking audio clearly anywhere in that room, and you should be fine. Otherwise, you will need to make adjustments, or get less effective results.