Develop Maximum Sexual Irresistibility 2.1

[4Kingdoms]

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-p...#pid119202

I'm getting the impression that some of you here are disappointed by and somewhat derisive of Version 2.1 of DMSI.

Let me point out to you that we are only a few days into testing.

On top of that, I had to rush it out without modeling it for optimization on results because of keeping my promise.

And finally, this program is in public testing. That means sometimes, not everything is going to work right.

I do a lot of private testing that fails, and you guys have never seen anything but my successes as a result of those tests you didn't see, with a few exceptions here and there.

Test release means it's not done yet, and we're trying to figure out which things don't work and what needs to be done to make them work.

In this case, it appears that we have the energy sourcing needing adjustment and probably the goal scripting as well.

So we discover that by observing that this version isn't doing what we want it to do. The next step is to adjust them and try again. That's part of testing. You don't always get it right immediately during testing.

If you guys want public testing, you have to understand that and deal with it. Otherwise, I can close testing again and you all can just wait until I'm done testing internally and behind closed doors.

I don't need criticism for a program that doesn't work right, when we knew it wasn't finished, which is why it's in testing status!

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7535-p...#pid119222

This time, I want to make sure the models not only say I have the variables functional, but I want there to be agreement between multiple runs for that.

The results I got from checking on the first modeling run of the phrasing "all people of the gender I am sexually attracted to" showed a moderately positive result. Much less than I would normally accept.

I'm looking for the wording that gets me the result that says, "Holy cow are these guys gonna love this!"

So it's taking some time to model, because it takes a while to enter all the variables, double check accuracy of entry, run the model, and then do it all over again for each option.

Also remember that I am modeling two variables - the goal phrasing and the energy source phrasing.

However, the models are repeatedly saying that I'm likely to get a very good result when it 2.2 is finished.