Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Fluffy - 05-24-2018

@Shannon

Is social skills and sense of humor aspect, directly dealt with in DMSI already? If not, do you plan to directly touch on that?

Based on what you have observed, will you be making any improvements to ARA that is in DMSI?

In 3.3, will you be adding something for the "down" negative effects, that a person such as myself experiences after releasing/orgasming with a woman, that takes a week to recover from?

Do you think DMSI 3.3 will be released by August 2018?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 05-24-2018

(05-21-2018, 12:00 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-17-2018, 03:48 PM)Have at ye Wrote:
(05-17-2018, 08:20 AM)kingpill Wrote: Ive noticed girls smiling a lot around me looking at me etc but ONLY WHEN THEY THINK I DONT NOTICE. As soon as I glance at them, they frown, then go back to smiling at me again thinking I dont see it.

Happens all the time.

Noticed the same thing several times with girls giving more direct, sexual IOIs (f. in. showing off their legs in my direction, "giving me a show", etc.) - once they notice I notice - or they notice that other people can see it - they are like "whoops". So it is actually best to pretend not to notice, TBH. Tongue Just acknowledge the "whoops" with a patented "I see what you did there" smile and it should be alright. Wink

Then again, had some examples of women doing their IOI things, me taking note of it explicitly, and them continuing shooting them IOIs because why not, I guess. Wink This has been happening much more often recently, and is somewhat setting-dependent (the fewer bystanders, the greater the chance of this happening).

I guess it would really depend mostly on the particular female's personality or the particular setting.

This is happening because she's responding, but scared of your response. 3.3 should significantly help with this.

I was thinking along the same lines. For a female it currently probably feels somewhat as if a guy were to gather up his courage to approach an extremely attractive, high-class woman by saying "Hi!" and heard "I'm totally going to give you a BJ right here and now" in response.

So might be somewhat... scary and confusing, to say the least. Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 08:12 AM)CatMan Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 12:28 AM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, I just noticed that my earphones are "broken" and the left side is playing at a lower volume than the right earpiece. I don't know how long this has been going on. Would this volume difference between left and right earphone affect the sub's effects?

It's likely not your headphones.

I've reported on this issue for a long time, it's present with all of Shannon's subs I've tried. I've tried multiple different sources, different headphones/speakers, all the same thing. The right side is several decibels louder than the left. Shannon didn't seem to think it was the case, but it's so prevalent I think he just hasn't realised is all.

Just know that it's likely your headphones are fine, and it's an issue with the files themselves. I personally just use my EQ, and take a little bit of volume off the right side to balance it. As it can annoy me at times being off centre.


Well I actually listened to music with them, and tried it with different headphones on the same phone, and put the headphones on my computer. It still indicated it was the headphone's problem. Tongue

I didn't know shannon's files do that already though?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 03:27 PM)dissonance Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 08:12 AM)CatMan Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 12:28 AM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, I just noticed that my earphones are "broken" and the left side is playing at a lower volume than the right earpiece. I don't know how long this has been going on. Would this volume difference between left and right earphone affect the sub's effects?

It's likely not your headphones.

I've reported on this issue for a long time, it's present with all of Shannon's subs I've tried. I've tried multiple different sources, different headphones/speakers, all the same thing. The right side is several decibels louder than the left. Shannon didn't seem to think it was the case, but it's so prevalent I think he just hasn't realised is all.

Just know that it's likely your headphones are fine, and it's an issue with the files themselves. I personally just use my EQ, and take a little bit of volume off the right side to balance it. As it can annoy me at times being off centre.


Well I actually listened to music with them, and tried it with different headphones on the same phone, and put the headphones on my computer. It still indicated it was the headphone's problem. Tongue

I didn't know shannon's files do that already though?

The files don't do that on some players, and do it on others, apparently. It does not happen on my players. Part of what I do in creating them is channel equalization, so I don't know how it could be the files.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 12:28 AM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, I just noticed that my earphones are "broken" and the left side is playing at a lower volume than the right earpiece. I don't know how long this has been going on. Would this volume difference between left and right earphone affect the sub's effects?

It will affect the effects of the sub, if it is present. It depends on the difference in volume. If it's only a few decibels, as most people report, not something to worry about. But this phenomenon doesn't happen to everyone.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 01:53 AM)Kol Wrote: @Shannon,

I am currently in my break after 14 says of version B, and my last update in my journal goes into the deeper gist.

I am reaching out right now due the crushing resistance probably. This woman, T, has numberclosed my online. Now im having her texting and Im feeling Im regresding strongly. Like, she aint doin anything wrong but it aint leading to nowhere from my side. I seem to be unable to spice anything up right now and it confuses me and makes me want to escape strongly.

Im not even sure why Im reaching out. I just want some feedback right now as it feels like drowing into quicksand.

Any suggestions?

Thank you in advance.

You would do well to start asking "why". Why am I resisting this woman? Why do I have this response to her? Is it something she said? Why do I respond this way?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon

Is social skills and sense of humor aspect, directly dealt with in DMSI already?

No.

Quote:If not, do you plan to directly touch on that?

If the goal is for you to have to do nothing, and get results, why would I start adding training wheels again? You are still trying to pursue her, which is the antithesis of the goals of this program.

Quote:Based on what you have observed, will you be making any improvements to ARA that is in DMSI?

I will be making some improvements that result in ARA in the script working better, but those improvements will also result in everything else working better as well.

Quote:In 3.3, will you be adding something for the "down" negative effects, that a person such as myself experiences after releasing/orgasming with a woman, that takes a week to recover from?

I'm not sure that is appropriate to add. I'm also not sure what I would add to counter that, since I don't know what is causing it.

Quote:Do you think DMSI 3.3 will be released by August 2018?

One can certainly hope.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon

Is social skills and sense of humor aspect, directly dealt with in DMSI already?

No.

Quote:If not, do you plan to directly touch on that?

If the goal is for you to have to do nothing, and get results, why would I start adding training wheels again? You are still trying to pursue her, which is the antithesis of the goals of this program.

Quote:Based on what you have observed, will you be making any improvements to ARA that is in DMSI?

I will be making some improvements that result in ARA in the script working better, but those improvements will also result in everything else working better as well.

Quote:In 3.3, will you be adding something for the "down" negative effects, that a person such as myself experiences after releasing/orgasming with a woman, that takes a week to recover from?

I'm not sure that is appropriate to add. I'm also not sure what I would add to counter that, since I don't know what is causing it.

Quote:Do you think DMSI 3.3 will be released by August 2018?

One can certainly hope.

The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch.

Are you saying this is what you believe you can achieve Shannon?

Did those famous rock stars like Elvis, the Beatles, and Michael Jackson gave poor social skills?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - mat422 - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch.

Are you saying this is what you believe you can achieve Shannon?

Did those famous rock stars like Elvis, the Beatles, and Michael Jackson gave poor social skills?

Unless an individual is on the autism spectrum I don't really believe in poor social skills. I'd argue what most people deem poor social skills are really just a lack of confidence in oneself mixed with fear.

You're kind of jumping to extremes here sarge and I don't really get your point you're making. Most people aren't as bad socially as they appear to themselves. Besides does it really matter if Shannon's program can't result in an anti-social person attracting 10s? All that really matters is that it works for you right?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 05:03 PM)mat422 Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch.

Are you saying this is what you believe you can achieve Shannon?

Did those famous rock stars like Elvis, the Beatles, and Michael Jackson gave poor social skills?

Unless an individual is on the autism spectrum I don't really believe in poor social skills. I'd argue what most people deem poor social skills are really just a lack of confidence in oneself mixed with fear.

You're kind of jumping to extremes here sarge and I don't really get your point you're making. Most people aren't as bad socially as they appear to themselves. Besides does it really matter if Shannon's program can't result in an anti-social person attracting 10s? All that really matters is that it works for you right?


Well, I believe I’m like that myself which is why I ask.

In that case, social skills may be more important than aura.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon

Is social skills and sense of humor aspect, directly dealt with in DMSI already?

No.

Quote:If not, do you plan to directly touch on that?

If the goal is for you to have to do nothing, and get results, why would I start adding training wheels again? You are still trying to pursue her, which is the antithesis of the goals of this program.

Quote:Based on what you have observed, will you be making any improvements to ARA that is in DMSI?

I will be making some improvements that result in ARA in the script working better, but those improvements will also result in everything else working better as well.

Quote:In 3.3, will you be adding something for the "down" negative effects, that a person such as myself experiences after releasing/orgasming with a woman, that takes a week to recover from?

I'm not sure that is appropriate to add. I'm also not sure what I would add to counter that, since I don't know what is causing it.

Quote:Do you think DMSI 3.3 will be released by August 2018?

One can certainly hope.

The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch.

Are you saying this is what you believe you can achieve Shannon?

Did those famous rock stars like Elvis, the Beatles, and Michael Jackson gave poor social skills?

Elvis was terrible with women, as the story goes.

I'd say Michael Jackson was quite the weirdo, too (I've always felt kinda sorry for the guy).

I don't know about the Beatles, though. Big Grin Lennon did always give me a creepy vibe, though.

Rock stars are quite often antisocial, insane or obnoxious, or all of the above at the same time. Same goes for certain famous actors.

Why? Because they can, basically. You don't really need social skills when everyone around you is doing everything they can to accommodate you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 05:53 PM)Have at ye Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon

Is social skills and sense of humor aspect, directly dealt with in DMSI already?

No.

Quote:If not, do you plan to directly touch on that?

If the goal is for you to have to do nothing, and get results, why would I start adding training wheels again? You are still trying to pursue her, which is the antithesis of the goals of this program.

Quote:Based on what you have observed, will you be making any improvements to ARA that is in DMSI?

I will be making some improvements that result in ARA in the script working better, but those improvements will also result in everything else working better as well.

Quote:In 3.3, will you be adding something for the "down" negative effects, that a person such as myself experiences after releasing/orgasming with a woman, that takes a week to recover from?

I'm not sure that is appropriate to add. I'm also not sure what I would add to counter that, since I don't know what is causing it.

Quote:Do you think DMSI 3.3 will be released by August 2018?

One can certainly hope.

The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch.

Are you saying this is what you believe you can achieve Shannon?

Did those famous rock stars like Elvis, the Beatles, and Michael Jackson gave poor social skills?

Elvis was terrible with women, as the story goes.

I'd say Michael Jackson was quite the weirdo, too (I've always felt kinda sorry for the guy).

I don't know about the Beatles, though. Big Grin Lennon did always give me a creepy vibe, though.

Rock stars are quite often antisocial, insane or obnoxious, or all of the above at the same time. Same goes for certain famous actors.

Why? Because they can, basically. You don't really need social skills when everyone around you is doing everything they can to accommodate you.

I thought Elvis had tons of girls? The Beatles too?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 06:01 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 05:53 PM)Have at ye Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon

Is social skills and sense of humor aspect, directly dealt with in DMSI already?

No.

Quote:If not, do you plan to directly touch on that?

If the goal is for you to have to do nothing, and get results, why would I start adding training wheels again? You are still trying to pursue her, which is the antithesis of the goals of this program.

Quote:Based on what you have observed, will you be making any improvements to ARA that is in DMSI?

I will be making some improvements that result in ARA in the script working better, but those improvements will also result in everything else working better as well.

Quote:In 3.3, will you be adding something for the "down" negative effects, that a person such as myself experiences after releasing/orgasming with a woman, that takes a week to recover from?

I'm not sure that is appropriate to add. I'm also not sure what I would add to counter that, since I don't know what is causing it.

Quote:Do you think DMSI 3.3 will be released by August 2018?

One can certainly hope.

The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch.

Are you saying this is what you believe you can achieve Shannon?

Did those famous rock stars like Elvis, the Beatles, and Michael Jackson gave poor social skills?

Elvis was terrible with women, as the story goes.

I'd say Michael Jackson was quite the weirdo, too (I've always felt kinda sorry for the guy).

I don't know about the Beatles, though. Big Grin Lennon did always give me a creepy vibe, though.

Rock stars are quite often antisocial, insane or obnoxious, or all of the above at the same time. Same goes for certain famous actors.

Why? Because they can, basically. You don't really need social skills when everyone around you is doing everything they can to accommodate you.

I thought Elvis had tons of girls? The Beatles too?

Well, yeah.

But Elvis would reportedly only sleep with his fans, and only the really young ones, too, because he'd feel really, really insecure otherwise.

I don't know about all of 'em Beatles, but John Lennon ended up with Yoko Ono. 'nuff said. Wink


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018

(05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon

Is social skills and sense of humor aspect, directly dealt with in DMSI already?

No.

Quote:If not, do you plan to directly touch on that?

If the goal is for you to have to do nothing, and get results, why would I start adding training wheels again? You are still trying to pursue her, which is the antithesis of the goals of this program.

Quote:Based on what you have observed, will you be making any improvements to ARA that is in DMSI?

I will be making some improvements that result in ARA in the script working better, but those improvements will also result in everything else working better as well.

Quote:In 3.3, will you be adding something for the "down" negative effects, that a person such as myself experiences after releasing/orgasming with a woman, that takes a week to recover from?

I'm not sure that is appropriate to add. I'm also not sure what I would add to counter that, since I don't know what is causing it.

Quote:Do you think DMSI 3.3 will be released by August 2018?

One can certainly hope.

The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch.

Are you saying this is what you believe you can achieve Shannon?

Did those famous rock stars like Elvis, the Beatles, and Michael Jackson gave poor social skills?

Once again, Sarge, you're looking for proof that you're right, even if that means you must fail to do it. Looking for why you can't will result in more of why you can't. If you want to be right about why you can't, then stop using DMSI and start using something else, and then be happy because you were right. Otherwise, stop insisting you can't and open your mind to an alternate experience that only you are preventing yourself from having.

Famous people often have worse than poor social skills. They don't need social skills because THEY'RE FAMOUS. People will do the work for them.