Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Steve_ - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 08:48 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: I am no longer a stonewaller. I was but now I am released from this and so i am an executer? hows that sound? as ill need to change my descrip' under my name.

Fixed Wink


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 08:48 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:42 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:40 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 03:17 AM)AstonMartin Wrote: Shannon, what can you estimate about the effectiveness of H&C in 3.2A then compared to 3.1A?
Maybe in percentage.

You're asking me what percentage of red is redder if we have more red than we have now. There's no way to answer. I have said this before several times already, but I will say it again:

DMSI will do what it takes to get you to the finish line, provided you execute the script.

A side will try to actively and gently clear and heal those issues that block you, and may take longer. B side will leave that job up to the Optimus Engine, which will achieve the goal by whatever means are most expedient. They will both get you past that barrier if you need H&C to do it; it's not a matter of which one is "more effective", but of which one is more suitable for your personality type.

I have no idea for me which therefore is better. As a stonewaller that is now not stonewalling on B, so far not fapping is the only tangible result I have noticed. I dont want to sabotage this by changing to A but I also dont want to miss on any better effect that A may give me. No idea. I would only change to A because the "H&C" sounds so amazing as I would love to heal and clear my inner garbage but at the same time, B being a sledgehammer will achieve this too and smash through.

I feel like im stuck between a rock and a hard place with this.

What if you cease to identify yourself as a stonewaller?

I am no longer a stonewaller. I was but now I am released from this and so i am an executer? hows that sound? as ill need to change my descrip' under my name.

Your first response was to identify as a stonewaller. What is the definition of a stonewaller, Jake? Someone who resists and stonewalls. And what will the subconscious do in reaction to the identity of being someone who resists and stonewalls? Perpetuate that reality, of course. Same reason why most people keep failing to really stop smoking, and instead they feed themselves bullshit lies about "I've quit 34 times now!" No, they paused 34 times now... they were always still a smoker because that was their core identity.

When someone called you out on this, you said you are no longer a stonewaller. But this identity is your subconscious reality, and was revealed as such by the automatic reference to yourself as such.

DMSI has scripting to deal with this. But it will take time to work. How much time, I don't know.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 09:29 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:33 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:29 AM)Shannon Wrote: Believe it or not, "Anything is possible" has been in the script for a long time...

this makes me wonder are there certain things that are easily executed by all, such as no masturbation and then are there those elements in DMSI that are NOT being executed at all, such as "anything is possible"?

Wouldnt the wall therefore eventually stop all from resisting?

Various things represent goals that are more or less desirable to the subconscious being tasked with achieving them as goals, and they will be responded to accordingly by virtue of how much it tries to resist or escape in some way.

The wall is there to prevent you from escaping through things like masturbation. It is an aspect of ASS/ART, but not by itself the end-all be-all.

When I figure out what is allowing people to do the things they do in response to a script that should already be producing results for everyone, I close that gate or loophole. Then the subconscious tries to find or create another. This is a game that I will eventually win, because eventually there will be none left. Whatever it can do, I can figure out and un-do. And by doing it, it reveals what can be done, and eventually, how. I will win.

Of course it seems unlikely that I will ever achieve 100% execution for 100% of the users, if only because once I achieve say 95% the return on energy and time invested to get that last 5% is no longer worth the cost to me. At that point, those who continue to choose to fail will be given my blessing to enjoy their failure, and the rest of us will move on to 6G.

Hey Shannon

How is your lung sub and the custom coming along?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 08:30 AM)Shannon Wrote: Instead of expecting and insisting on failure, figure out what YOU are doing to get that reaction, and change it. That's how I stopped choosing women who would cheat on and betray me.

Been doing that for a while now. There's not a lot of insight on the matter. Everything I've tried so far has not led to success.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 08:29 AM)Shannon Wrote: Believe it or not, "Anything is possible" has been in the script for a long time...

You put anything is possible in the script for DMSI 3.2 ??


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 09:58 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:30 AM)Shannon Wrote: Instead of expecting and insisting on failure, figure out what YOU are doing to get that reaction, and change it. That's how I stopped choosing women who would cheat on and betray me.

Been doing that for a while now. There's not a lot of insight on the matter. Everything I've tried so far has not led to success.

Keep looking.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 10:13 AM)thor2014 Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:29 AM)Shannon Wrote: Believe it or not, "Anything is possible" has been in the script for a long time...

You put anything is possible in the script for DMSI 3.2 ??

It's been in DMSI since around 2.5


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Zane - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 08:48 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:42 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:40 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-14-2018, 03:17 AM)AstonMartin Wrote: Shannon, what can you estimate about the effectiveness of H&C in 3.2A then compared to 3.1A?
Maybe in percentage.

You're asking me what percentage of red is redder if we have more red than we have now. There's no way to answer. I have said this before several times already, but I will say it again:

DMSI will do what it takes to get you to the finish line, provided you execute the script.

A side will try to actively and gently clear and heal those issues that block you, and may take longer. B side will leave that job up to the Optimus Engine, which will achieve the goal by whatever means are most expedient. They will both get you past that barrier if you need H&C to do it; it's not a matter of which one is "more effective", but of which one is more suitable for your personality type.

I have no idea for me which therefore is better. As a stonewaller that is now not stonewalling on B, so far not fapping is the only tangible result I have noticed. I dont want to sabotage this by changing to A but I also dont want to miss on any better effect that A may give me. No idea. I would only change to A because the "H&C" sounds so amazing as I would love to heal and clear my inner garbage but at the same time, B being a sledgehammer will achieve this too and smash through.

I feel like im stuck between a rock and a hard place with this.

What if you cease to identify yourself as a stonewaller?

I am no longer a stonewaller. I was but now I am released from this and so i am an executer? hows that sound? as ill need to change my descrip' under my name.

It's better that u start saying that u are an "Executor".


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-14-2018

Identifying with being a resistor, a stonewaller, etc. resists the goal in itself. But stating that you are an executor before you are is also going to trigger resistance. For now, just disconnecting the "resister" identity is the goal.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Steve_ - 03-14-2018

Let me steal Shannon thunder for a minute and announce the release of a new experimental sub that will be hitting the shop within the next day or two. Here is the description:

APCE_MFX_HU

This new subliminal is being released, purposely without clear description, for free in order to test a new subliminal technology. It contains specific, unique technology that is not present in any other subliminals currently in production. The reason for not giving a clear indication of what this sub does or any clues about the goals of the script is to definitively test what the results will be without the user being aware of the goal(s). We will gague success upon user experience in journal entries on the forum.

We want to reiterate that APCE_MFX_HU is for experimental use only and we do not guarantee nor claim to guarantee results of any kind.

This subliminal is designed to be a voluntary effect, and therefore will only affect people who subconsciously agree to the goals of the program, so it is therefore safe to expose others while exposing the self.

Compatibility:
APCE_MFX_HU does contain P6 technology and as such it is not compatible with use along side any other subliminal.

Usage:
We recommend starting at one loop per day to allow yourself to observe how minimum exposure will effect you. Please be aware that each loop is 2 hours long. Moderate volume is suggested. APCE_MFX_HU should be used only by persons 18 years and older and is suitable for use by any gender.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 12:10 PM)Cyanide Wrote: Let me steal Shannon thunder for a minute and announce the release of a new experimental sub that will be hitting the shop within the next day or two. Here is the description:

APCE_MFX_HU

This new subliminal is being released, purposely without clear description, for free in order to test a new subliminal technology. It contains specific, unique technology that is not present in any other subliminals currently in production. The reason for not giving a clear indication of what this sub does or any clues about the goals of the script is to definitively test what the results will be without the user being aware of the goal(s). We will gague success upon user experience in journal entries on the forum.

We want to reiterate that APCE_MFX_HU is for experimental use only and we do not guarantee nor claim to guarantee results of any kind.

This subliminal is designed to be a voluntary effect, and therefore will only affect people who subconsciously agree to the goals of the program, so it is therefore safe to expose others while exposing the self.

Compatibility:
APCE_MFX_HU does contain P6 technology and as such it is not compatible with use along side any other subliminal.

Usage:
We recommend starting at one loop per day to allow yourself to observe how minimum exposure will effect you. Please be aware that each loop is 2 hours long. Moderate volume is suggested. APCE_MFX_HU should be used only by persons 18 years and older and is suitable for use by any gender.

Is that serious?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Sanbosay - 03-14-2018

What is APCE_MFX_HU?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 03-14-2018

(03-14-2018, 12:34 PM)Sanbosay Wrote: What is APCE_MFX_HU?

Quote:This new subliminal is being released, purposely without clear description, for free in order to test a new subliminal technology



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Steve_ - 03-14-2018

Yes it's serious. We expect not much usage currently due to dmsi. However, for those who are not using dmsi and are in transition between subs may find time to try it out.