Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - mat422 - 04-26-2018

Ah had a whole post written out about caffeine effects on DMSI. Realized it was my mind trying to escape dmsi again. Couldn't delete my caffeine fueled ramblings so I'm just editing it. Carry on everyone.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Superman - 04-26-2018

Lol I'd like to read about how caffeine affects dmsi


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - mat422 - 04-26-2018

(04-26-2018, 08:00 AM)Superman Wrote: Lol I'd like to read about how caffeine affects dmsi

Haha. I'll post all the details in my journal.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarkPlouf - 04-26-2018

(04-26-2018, 05:14 AM)Shannon Wrote: You have a different definition of psychic seduction than I am going on. But you are still incorrect when you say it can't bend someone's will. It is just a matter of degrees of skill and energy used. Be sure you never take away someone's freedom of choice. The backlash and fallout from that is bad.
Are you talking about Karma ? You a believer ?
I've always believed that karma stuff is just a lie from gurus so that they can keep their power for themselves and scare people from doing what they want.

Quote:In my experience there's no such thing as "total conscious control" when attempting stuff of this ilk.
Still, their conscious decision seem to be the ultimate barrier. After all many have drunk dialed and did/say whatever they have been influenced to do. Then when sober they take back everything Rolleyes. Isn't that a proof in their sober waking state they consciously decide to reject and bury these ideas ?
Oh well personally I'd have to witness it to believe it's possible to change someone else will remotely.Blackhat


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 04-26-2018

(04-26-2018, 09:36 AM)DarkPlouf Wrote:
(04-26-2018, 05:14 AM)Shannon Wrote: You have a different definition of psychic seduction than I am going on. But you are still incorrect when you say it can't bend someone's will. It is just a matter of degrees of skill and energy used. Be sure you never take away someone's freedom of choice. The backlash and fallout from that is bad.
Are you talking about Karma ? You a believer ?
I've always believed that karma stuff is just a lie from gurus so that they can keep their power for themselves and scare people from doing what they want.

Quote:In my experience there's no such thing as "total conscious control" when attempting stuff of this ilk.
Still, their conscious decision seem to be the ultimate barrier. After all many have drunk dialed and did/say whatever they have been influenced to do. Then when sober they take back everything Rolleyes. Isn't that a proof in their sober waking state they consciously decide to reject and bury these ideas ?
Oh well personally I'd have to witness it to believe it's possible to change someone else will remotely.Blackhat

Well, I'm *SO* not going to give any guidelines or advice on how this can be done. Big Grin

Anyroad, I believe that trying to install an unconscious compulsion to perform a particular action in someone is an attempt at so-called "mind control", and I'd generally label it under the "really, REALLY bad ideas" heading. Also, it's a d**k move. Wink

I also don't think "karma" is a lie per se, it's just that the concept is widely misrepresented (sometimes, perhaps, on purpose, though, as the saying goes, "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" Wink ) and/or misunderstood, as the actual workings of it do seem to be rather... complex. I really cannot claim to understand the exact workings of it, for instance, but it would seem that yes, a mechanism often called "the law of karma" is in effect.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarkPlouf - 04-26-2018

Quote:Well, I'm *SO* not going to give any guidelines or advice on how this can be done. Big Grin
Yeah of course that's so damn dangerous lol. Best to keep that for yourself.

Quote:Anyroad, I believe that trying to install an unconscious compulsion to perform a particular action in someone is an attempt at so-called "mind control", and I'd generally label it under the "really, REALLY bad ideas" heading. Also, it's a d**k move. Wink
Well when I tried it I was desperate and that's how I got introduced to it. Nearly worked but I was too much of a pussy. I'm not doing that anymore on unwilling persons. I'd rather change myself, I think it's better. But in comparison it's so hard. I mean, with psychic stuff in 2 weeks you can see changes in the monitored targets at least you know something happens (even if you'll likely never got 100% achievement) but when it comes down to yourself all you see is "resistance" it seems. And even after years of h/c and fighting you still find yourself at the same place. Not surprised some get desperate and want to manipulate others instead. Seems to be far easier if you know how to do it properly.

Quote:I also don't think "karma" is a lie per se, it's just that the concept is widely misrepresented (sometimes, perhaps, on purpose, though, as the saying goes, "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" Wink ) and/or misunderstood, as the actual workings of it do seem to be rather... complex. I really cannot claim to understand the exact workings of it, for instance, but it would seem that yes, a mechanism often called "the law of karma" is in effect.
Well personally I believe as a human being with a conscious mind - so with the power of decision you can go all out and do whatever the ** you want. But just we shall be prepared to face the logical consequences.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Broski - 04-26-2018

(04-25-2018, 09:38 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 06:59 AM)Razib1988 Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 06:27 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 05:29 AM)Razib1988 Wrote: @Shannon, would you recommend doing psychic seduction meditation on a specific person while on DMSI?

No. In fact I would recommend never doing that, ever.

Can you please elaborate on why we should not do that? And what way it may conflict with obtaining the goals of DMSI?

Manipulating someone into having sex with you isn't a good idea. So far we have managed to avoid that with DMSI. I am really, REALLY not interested in making DMSI work by manipulating the affected. We are attempting to influence by persuasion, not manipulation. We want them to make the desired choice, but not take away their freedom to have a choice to make.

It also conflicts with what DMSI is trying to do by attempting to redirect energy and attention from what DMSI may be doing in a different direction, or trying to make what happens happen in a way that is not safe.

Not sure exactly what physic seduction entails, but is it akin to visualizing someone you want to have sex with having sex with you to get it to manifest in reality? If so, do you also recommend against any sort of visualization when it comes to success with woman while on dmsi? Like not specific girls per se, but just visualizing random attractive woman in general coming onto you?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Determined - 04-26-2018

Hey Shannon, is it possible for an introvert to turn into an extrovert?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 04-26-2018

(04-26-2018, 10:58 AM)Broski Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 09:38 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 06:59 AM)Razib1988 Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 06:27 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 05:29 AM)Razib1988 Wrote: @Shannon, would you recommend doing psychic seduction meditation on a specific person while on DMSI?

No. In fact I would recommend never doing that, ever.

Can you please elaborate on why we should not do that? And what way it may conflict with obtaining the goals of DMSI?

Manipulating someone into having sex with you isn't a good idea. So far we have managed to avoid that with DMSI. I am really, REALLY not interested in making DMSI work by manipulating the affected. We are attempting to influence by persuasion, not manipulation. We want them to make the desired choice, but not take away their freedom to have a choice to make.

It also conflicts with what DMSI is trying to do by attempting to redirect energy and attention from what DMSI may be doing in a different direction, or trying to make what happens happen in a way that is not safe.

Not sure exactly what physic seduction entails, but is it akin to visualizing someone you want to have sex with having sex with you to get it to manifest in reality? If so, do you also recommend against any sort of visualization when it comes to success with woman while on dmsi? Like not specific girls per se, but just visualizing random attractive woman in general coming onto you?

Well, in general, "psychic seduction" is a label used to describe various thought-actions (no idea what else to call it) whose purpose is seducing another person and/or having sex with a person. So, when people talk about "psychic seduction", they often lump in visualization under the heading. Although, as you have said, it is more of a manifestation tool. I'd say visualization is a pretty safe tool, [EDIT: especially if used without a particular person in mind], compared to the following:

"Psychic seduction" also involves other things, like f. in. directed sexual energy manipulation, sending so-called "thought-forms" to another person, etc., whose aim is to influence the subconscious of the "seduced" individual into entering a romantic or sexual relationship with the sender. It involves pretty much all sorts of remote influence shenanigans whose aim is to influence a person to become "seduced" by the operator, and by "seduced" it means "do what the operator wants you to do". This stuff can be downright dangerous.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 04-26-2018

Shannon, do you think that Optimus Engine can be made so strong that there can ever be a sub made that will get us results for literally anything that we write down and focus on a few times a day? So in essence, a sub that amplifies our focus on our goal subconsciously and gets rid of obstacles/ creates aura without the sub necessarily being focused on one specific thing?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 04-26-2018

(04-26-2018, 05:48 AM)Have at ye Wrote:
(04-26-2018, 05:14 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 02:24 PM)DarkPlouf Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 01:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 09:50 AM)DarkPlouf Wrote: Lol it's not like psychic influence can bend someone's will. It only works when the target has the potential to make the decision and just need a little push. All what psychic seduction does to unwilling targets is making them go release with the person they actually want to have sex with.

I would say you're not very well educated on the subject.
Maybe, can't pretend to know everything about it, but I've a solid experience with psychic influence. From myself but also from a group of fellow interested in this subject. Pshysic influence can't force someone to do what that person doesn't want. May be for sex or for whatever else. If that person is against or is afraid of the idea, no action will be taken, no matter how much or how frequently the thoughts and idea are transmitted and well received. The target just bear with these incessant ideas that pop in his/her mind but take no action. In the end, the target has still to carry out an action from his own volition.

In the case of psychic seduction that's actually a pretty bad idea as that practice keeps making horny the target, in most case, and they go release with the person they are allowed to, or with the first outlet they can get. If that person likes you and already registered you as "the guy I can safely have sex with" then it'll work and you'll be the first choice. But as such, if that person like you from the start or has the potential to, there's no need for psychic seduction. Meaning psychic seduction doesn't burn steps and you still need to do the work Non. They "suffer" in silence but absolutely do nothing about it if they do not want to.
And even when there are instances of psychic seduction working against someone's will, it only acts as a temporary drug. Once the target wakes up, that person will utterly deny what he/she did under such circumstances. We are witnessing targets going hot and cold and hot and cold incessantly. Taking back things they said or did outrageously during such influenced state. Because that doesn't match their decisions.

Psychic influence is good for mundane things. Making a friend invite you for a pizza, making them say something, influence your birthday gifts, and do some other funny stuff. Because most people are "neutral", or even favorable to these mundane ideas. But if they truly don't wan't, not only psychic influence will make them hate you but will likely fail, unless anything good and logical came up to change their view. But in such case again, no need for psychic influence.

So no, that can't bend someone else will. And I'm not just saying that from my thorough experience, materials, observations and experiments from other practitioners, but because it actually makes sense when we think about it. No matter what that happens in the mind realm of the target, if the conscious mind isn't aligned with it, no physical manifestation (action) will be made of it.
Don't wish anyone to get trapped into that stuff thinking they can control others like I was. Even tho I still practice it but it's only with willing partners.

You have a different definition of psychic seduction than I am going on. But you are still incorrect when you say it can't bend someone's will. It is just a matter of degrees of skill and energy used. Be sure you never take away someone's freedom of choice. The backlash and fallout from that is bad.

Yup, it is possible to bend someone's will, even inadvertently, when doing "psychic seduction" stuff. Unless proper precautions are taken, of course, but precautions do tend to significantly weaken the effects when doing remote influencing, I guess. Also, they can fail. In my experience there's no such thing as "total conscious control" when attempting stuff of this ilk. You set something off in this way, it tends to go wherever inertia takes it once it gets rolling.

Then again, the entire point of DMSI's aura is having this stuff become automated, and actually your second nature, in the best way possible, so I highly doubt that the use of psychic seduction techniques would make it any stronger.

I was considering, though, coming up with an affirmation of a sort, which would go something like "I now choose to willingly consciously and subconsciously execute the full extent of the DMSI 3.2(a/b) sniper module on <person's name>", to maybe give it some more focus, or to engage the full power of the sniper even when a given person is outside of the short-range sniper's range of effect. I'm not certain what wording to use exactly (as the one presented here I just came up with on the spot), and would consider maybe adding a time-limiter for the sniping process so as not to became exhausted, but perhaps there might be something to it. Any thoughts, Shannon, sir?

The conscious will is a powerful tool for guiding the conscious and subconscious, given that the subconscious will is not stronger. But right now, I am just too tired mentally to be able to answer this better than that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 04-26-2018

(04-26-2018, 09:36 AM)DarkPlouf Wrote: Are you talking about Karma ? You a believer ?
I've always believed that karma stuff is just a lie from gurus so that they can keep their power for themselves and scare people from doing what they want.

I go on evidence to form my beliefs. And I can tell you, doing whatever you want will bite you in the end if it unbalances the equation. Whether it's now or later. I have been bitten by my misunderstanding of that fact many times, and I have used my understanding of that fact to win many times as well.

If you want to call it karma or simply the universe maintaining balance, it is there. And if you want to test it, I'm sure that eventually you will learn what I know from painful experience. Belief is not required, which is a good thing.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 04-26-2018

(04-26-2018, 11:01 AM)Determined Wrote: Hey Shannon, is it possible for an introvert to turn into an extrovert?

I believe it is, but I am not exactly an expert on that matter either.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 04-26-2018

(04-26-2018, 11:34 AM)kingpill Wrote: Shannon, do you think that Optimus Engine can be made so strong that there can ever be a sub made that will get us results for literally anything that we write down and focus on a few times a day? So in essence, a sub that amplifies our focus on our goal subconsciously and gets rid of obstacles/ creates aura without the sub necessarily being focused on one specific thing?

The optimus engine is what causes the subconscious to achieve the goal according to a polymorphic reaction to the challenges in the way. The subconscious will always use the easiest method possible to achieve the goal when given this sort of optional way forward. It would seem unlikely to me that the OE by itself is really what you're asking about, or that an aura would be the first or most likely way the subconscious would respond based purely on the OE. But it is possible that such a sub may eventually exist.