Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shadow2200 - 04-19-2018

(04-18-2018, 04:53 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-17-2018, 10:46 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon,

First I would like to thank you for having the courage to set a goal such as DMSI. This program is amazing. It really helps me in a variety of ways in my life. And I can clearly see now why you implemented PTPA and Anxiety relief.

Thanks for your appreciation.

Quote:Few pages back, you said there are many factors that determine attractiveness and you have a list of 100 or so factors in your notes. You also mentioned that most of these factors are still not in DMSI.

Hopefully we going to get some of these factors in 3.3, yes?
What are some major factors of that list you looking to put in 3.3? Any examples? Something that is not currently in 3.2. Maybe some of us already experiencing these factors as a result of TID

I said that there are well over 100 tumblers to the "lock" of female sexuality. I don't remember exactly how many I have discovered so far, but it's something between 130 and 150. These are all the things that a woman will consider and take into account before allowing herself to, and choosing to have sex.

Those factors are for the most part not yet in DMSI. I'm not sure how much of that will make it into 3.3, but 3.3 will be focusing on upgrading the auric modulation and effects.

What they are is not something I care to share. It's taken me over 15 years of constant work to discover these, tease them out of endless experiments and data. I don't want to just give that away. But I will tell you this. There are a lot of things a woman takes into account and considers that would never in a million years cross a man's mind as to his own sexual choices and actions. This is the primary sticking point for most men: they have no idea what she's really thinking and basing her sexual choices and actions on.

Keep in mind that completely unlocking the sexuality of a woman is still not within my grasp. Even after more than 15 years of work, I still can't do it. Women are extremely complex creatures, and they have an entirely different set of tumblers to their "lock" than males do. It also depends on their sexual orientation, as it does with men. So it may be that I never discover how to completely unlock this, and even if I do, how would I implement it? I don't know yet. I'll be going as far as I can safely go with DMSI, but in the end, we have to move on sooner or later, even if I cannot fully unlock human sexuality.

I'm sure you've noted that we are making progress with each release, though, and that DMSI 3.2 has achieved design spec on a number of occasions. The biggest issues we have right now are resistance from the user, and resistance from the affected. I'd say the former is much more dangerous to the ultimate success of the program than the latter.

I'd have to say as for as my testing has gone it been more the latter resistance from the user has been the biggest hold back form this really taking off at this point


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 04-19-2018

(04-19-2018, 12:51 AM)findingme Wrote: I've been on LTU for a week. I'm looking at going to DMSI in about 2 weeks since I was on UD, and 21 days I'm supposed to be off any 5.5 subs. Need I be off all subs before starting DMSI, or is it just 5.5 subs that I need a break from?

It is necessary to take a break from all subs to be really effective. 3 and 4G subs you would only need a few days from. 5G, a week. And anything above that, 21 days is the minimum because of P5/P6. The exception would be EHPRA 2.0, which is the only 5.5G to not have P5 or P6 in it. That you should have a minimum 7 day break from.

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 04-19-2018

35 days!? damn sam thats some POWER4FUL shit ! to say da least!
I betcha in the future it could be as much as 3 months or more between 'shifts',so to speak,or maybe no thing is needed as the new revelations-technology becomes so advanced that theres no need to have 'down time', but so far though.... talk about quantum jumps...geez!!

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.


(04-19-2018, 04:54 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-19-2018, 12:51 AM)findingme Wrote: I've been on LTU for a week. I'm looking at going to DMSI in about 2 weeks since I was on UD, and 21 days I'm supposed to be off any 5.5 subs. Need I be off all subs before starting DMSI, or is it just 5.5 subs that I need a break from?

It is necessary to take a break from all subs to be really effective. 3 and 4G subs you would only need a few days from. 5G, a week. And anything above that, 21 days is the minimum because of P5/P6. The exception would be EHPRA 2.0, which is the only 5.5G to not have P5 or P6 in it. That you should have a minimum 7 day break from.

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Griffin - 04-19-2018

Hey Shannon,

Is there a subliminal in the making for: overcome procrastination, ultimate self discipline, motivation, ultra succes?

this would make my life alot better i think.

cheers,

Griffin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 04-20-2018

Shannon,
Why have you suggested to Catman to do 7loops of DMSI? Is that one of initial options the models suggested?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shadow2200 - 04-20-2018

Did Shannon open up the number of loops per day yet


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - findingme - 04-20-2018

Shannon,

It appears you've put some AM pieces in DMSI, such as the IDGAF attitude, high value thinking, and killing procrastination.

Did you put the decisiveness piece in 3.2 or any previous version? I'm not stressing for it, but I fumbled in making quick decisions twice today with my ex-Marine very alpha boss, and I've been thinking on it. I'll be starting DMSI soon, and that would be an excellent add-on to look forward to.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 04-20-2018

(04-20-2018, 02:59 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote: Did Shannon open up the number of loops per day yet

No, 1 loop per day.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shadow2200 - 04-20-2018

(04-20-2018, 03:14 PM)samba99 Wrote:
(04-20-2018, 02:59 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote: Did Shannon open up the number of loops per day yet

No, 1 loop per day.

We need 8 loops to break through


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 04-20-2018

Will the end product of DMSI be 6G or will it remain as 5.5G?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 04-20-2018

(04-20-2018, 04:19 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote:
(04-20-2018, 03:14 PM)samba99 Wrote:
(04-20-2018, 02:59 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote: Did Shannon open up the number of loops per day yet

No, 1 loop per day.

We need 8 loops to break through

I have no idea why y’all think that way.
My best success ever with this sub is when I did 2 loops per day. Two days per week. When everyone was doing 3-4loops everyday.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 04-21-2018

(04-19-2018, 01:50 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: 35 days!? damn sam thats some POWER4FUL shit ! to say da least!
I betcha in the future it could be as much as 3 months or more between 'shifts',so to speak,or maybe no thing is needed as the new revelations-technology becomes so advanced that theres no need to have 'down time', but so far though.... talk about quantum jumps...geez!!

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.


(04-19-2018, 04:54 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(04-19-2018, 12:51 AM)findingme Wrote: I've been on LTU for a week. I'm looking at going to DMSI in about 2 weeks since I was on UD, and 21 days I'm supposed to be off any 5.5 subs. Need I be off all subs before starting DMSI, or is it just 5.5 subs that I need a break from?

It is necessary to take a break from all subs to be really effective. 3 and 4G subs you would only need a few days from. 5G, a week. And anything above that, 21 days is the minimum because of P5/P6. The exception would be EHPRA 2.0, which is the only 5.5G to not have P5 or P6 in it. That you should have a minimum 7 day break from.

The latest versions of DMSI (3.1 and 3.2) have P6 so powerful that it is recommended that you take a 35 day break after using them.

P6 is fully optimized. It will be unlikely to go beyond 53 days, because it will be unlikely that I will ever need top adjust it again. Fortunately. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 04-21-2018

(04-19-2018, 11:51 PM)Griffin Wrote: Hey Shannon,

Is there a subliminal in the making for: overcome procrastination, ultimate self discipline, motivation, ultra succes?

this would make my life alot better i think.

cheers,

Griffin

I am currently swamped between the custom, the Disconnect From Negative Stress sub, dealing with my girlfriend and dealing with my family. I'd like to build Ultra Success and Ultra Motivation, but until things calm down on the female/family front, no dice. There is not enough time in a day right now.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 04-21-2018

(04-20-2018, 10:28 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon,
Why have you suggested to Catman to do 7loops of DMSI? Is that one of initial options the models suggested?

The models returned the value of 7 loops for CatMan to achieve significant success. The fact that he found an excuse to only do 1 loop tells me that he knows that would have worked, so he escaped in what way he could. Which really doesn't surprise me, since I predicted that some of you guys would do exactly that sort of thing in response to 3.2 and later, on this very forum, before releasing 3.2. I even told you guys that the excuses would end up being very logical, creative, well thought out and believable. But they are still excuses.