+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AlphaRomeo - 02-17-2019
(02-16-2019, 10:39 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Does universal detox....
Detox the universe?
No, the universe is detoxing the sub that Shannon scripted being toxic. It´s one of those Shannon´s little experiments...to use the sub as a test subject to see how the universe does detoxing. Those who purchase the sub pays for being able to observe the process, for what it´s worth.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 02-17-2019
(02-17-2019, 07:39 AM)Minititan Wrote:(02-16-2019, 07:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:(02-16-2019, 07:25 PM)Nara Wrote: For those who are wondering about Magnus Engine, this is from the glossary...
Quote:Magnus Engine: A group of THREE different major technology modules (of which the Advanced Amplification Engine is Part 1), which act as a group to make the programs in which it is found much more powerful and effective. As of DMSI, Part 2 was introduced to the skeleton script. DMSI 3.4 is the planned release for introducing Part 3.
Yup. It was THREE part. But now it has the fourth part.
Keep in mind, Part 3 has not been added. It is so complex that I haven't found a way to include it without making the script vastly more long and complex than I can find a way to do at this point. That is why I completed the Magnus Engine with Part 4, which is (by comparative) a work of art in it's simplicity and configurability, and even more powerful than Part 3.
So does this mean dmsi 3.4 is in the near future?
We shall see.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kol - 02-17-2019
(02-16-2019, 10:39 PM)Benjamin Wrote: Does universal detox....
Detox the universe?
*He-man intro song starts playing*
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 02-17-2019
I was thinkin' "BirdMan" Intro from 1967 but Hey.....!! its groovy and Shaga-delic ! Ha!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alXW_hS0gSo
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - CatMan - 02-17-2019
Hi Shannon!
On the subject of this post:
(02-17-2019, 09:53 AM)Shannon Wrote: Arousal isn't the problem. It's there, or you wouldn't be getting those responses in those situations. What we need is either disinhibition or fear removal for the affected.
Do you feel this is something that can be resolved with simply running this current version? Or, is another version needed to do this? If so, what do we do with this version until that one comes out? If it's true that another version is needed to actually do that, it seems this program may be at a brick wall. Often, I've spoken of not seeing any "clear" signs the sub is truly "causing me to be sexually attractive and making girls I find sexually attractive aggressively pursue me to have sex purely because I find them sexually attractive, and to the degree I do..." as I've heard is the purpose of the program. I admit...I still have real doubts that will ever come to be, especially when I think of several girls around me that were drivers for me signing on for this program. The thought of them wanting me as much as I want/wanted them, or more so, doesn't seem realistic at all to me, and still seems just as far away as before. I think I've largely given up on most of, if not all of them, at this point to be honest. Just seems way too farfetched and there's been no forward momentum to spur optimism onward. I tried to get some meetups going with 3 of them, 1 seems to be seeing someone now, two ignored the messages even though they were very cordial beforehand and even one was seemingly flirting. Makes no sense, typical 180 out of nowhere I've long been used to in my life, extremely rude behaviour from them, but it's very typical it seems. Just don't seem to have the "bad boy value" or whatever it is that makes them actually value you and respect you, otherwise you're ignored or looked down on for some reason, despite having this program. Anyway, it's obvious to me I'll need to see the design goal thing first hand, in reality, actually occur, with zero doubt.
In so many words, I seem to have been describing this phenomenon over time. This "almost, but not really" situation, where you think there might be something unusual happen, but then it goes away or changes quick or whatever. And there's zero momentum with it, so nothing ACTUALLY happens in the end. It's really just optimistic theory/fantasy, apparently. The next time you interact with a girl for example, she's weird or cold, awkward, distant, or doesn't reply to messages for no reason at all, ignorant, etc. etc. Complete 180. And you did absolutely NOTHING wrong, or creepy, or whatever, so there's zero basis for such treatment. Deeply confusing and demoralising over time, and likely seeds further resentment/anger towards them etc. And makes it easy to question whether or not anything is TRULY going on. And that you may have blown it up to be something when it wasn't, since you WANTED it to be something. Seems like maybe there is a brick wall, almost like she's like "wait...THIS isn't my type" or whatever, and it's ruined. Bottom line, I just never feel respected as actually a sexy option in their view. Still seem to be an afterthought, if that for some reason, there doesn't seem to be any lasting impact, tangibly. Still just the funny/nice/charming guy, that doesn't seem to have any sexual attraction and zero chasing taking place or sexual overtures...and I still don't buy that very attractive women will aggressively chase a guy for sex unless he's a bad boy, rich, or famous, or extremely attractive physically. Those instances are the only times I've seen hot girls act thirsty, otherwise, they're drowning in choice, why would they bother? And they tend to look down on other men that don't fit that bill, making it seem even more unfeasible. Makes it hard to really get behind the program's goal to be honest. I'll need to see it first hand, to truly believe I guess. We'll see...
I'm simply wondering if a new version will be needed to break through this annoyance/brick wall. I feel it is, but was just curious. Looking forward to a new version, hopefully it's very soon. I get the sense it'll just be spinning wheels, otherwise.
That post was a bit concerning, so I was just looking for some info on things is all. All the best, thank you. Congrats on LTU coming up, I hope you sell a lot of copies of it to make lots of $$$, lol.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - 4Kingdoms - 02-18-2019
@CatMan
When Ricardo and I ran MYPSL, Ricardo came to the realization that he wanted Romance and stopped MYPSL. (Manifest Your Perfect Sexual Lover)
Let's be honest, who doesn't want to have sex?? I think Shannon hit a home run when he added a module to improve your love life to LTU 5.0. Note the words "love life" instead of "sex life". It can improve your sex life, but it will only do so as a function of improving your love life.
I guess what I'm asking is, do you want a "love life" or do you want a "sex life"?
(I don't really expect you to answer, just thought I'd give you something to ponder.)
Heck, it even has me wondering about what I really want after I achieve my goals with USLM!!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AlphaRomeo - 02-18-2019
(02-18-2019, 04:02 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: @CatMan
When Ricardo and I ran MYPSL, Ricardo came to the realization that he wanted Romance and stopped MYPSL. (Manifest Your Perfect Sexual Lover)
Let's be honest, who doesn't want to have sex?? I think Shannon hit a home run when he added a module to improve your love life to LTU 5.0. Note the words "love life" instead of "sex life". It can improve your sex life, but it will only do so as a function of improving your love life.
I guess what I'm asking is, do you want a "love life" or do you want a "sex life"?
(I don't really expect you to answer, just thought I'd give you something to ponder.)
Heck, it even has me wondering about what I really want after I achieve my goals with USLM!!
That is a great question. Not just for CatMan, but for all of us. Especially for those who have been a (very)long time on DMSI without notable success. Doesn´t mean you can´t have both, but might be very well worth to contemplate on which one (if any of those) you put emphasis on, at this point in your life.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - 4Kingdoms - 02-18-2019
(02-18-2019, 04:02 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: @CatMan
When Ricardo and I ran MYPSL, Ricardo came to the realization that he wanted Romance and stopped MYPSL. (Manifest Your Perfect Sexual Lover)
Let's be honest, who doesn't want to have sex?? I think Shannon hit a home run when he added a module to improve your love life to LTU 5.0. Note the words "love life" instead of "sex life". It can improve your sex life, but it will only do so as a function of improving your love life.
I guess what I'm asking is, do you want a "love life" or do you want a "sex life"?
(I don't really expect you to answer, just thought I'd give you something to ponder.)
Heck, it even has me wondering about what I really want after I achieve my goals with USLM!!
(02-18-2019, 07:03 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: That is a great question. Not just for CatMan, but for all of us. Especially for those who have been a (very)long time on DMSI without notable success. Doesn´t mean you can´t have both, but might be very well worth to contemplate on which one (if any of those) you put emphasis on, at this point in your life.
Indeed!! It is a question for everyone whether or not you use DMSI or use LTU 5.0.
Like I said, "Even I am wondering... which is more important to me... improving my love life or just wanting a sex life??"
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Darwinn - 02-18-2019
(02-17-2019, 06:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:(02-17-2019, 01:17 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote: @Shannon I did have one question Shannon if you don't mind. It was in regards to one of the upgrades that is suppose to be about "choosing happiness" instead of something else (whether out of habit or another reason, etc). I was wondering does this take in account Long term Happiness vs Short term Happiness? I know another reason why lots of people get no where in life is because they aren't able to defer instant gratification for long term gratification. A person for example will keep on playing a video game to get instant gratification (and that short term dopamine hit) than say working on their studies to further their career which would actually make them happy in the long term.
I did see you put in something about developing and improving patience. So you might have already thought of this but I thought I would ask just for clarification if you took this all into account.
The way I have it phrased, that should be covered, but it never hurts to double check. I am still early enough in the build process to make corrections if need be. I don't think it will need adjustment, but why not check again, right?
this is pretty important for me. Delayed gratification seems a lot bit harder when i'm just happy and in the moment.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 02-18-2019
I want a Love Life,a Beloved one,companionship,connectivity of the heart,spirit,soul,mind and yes body
,but not stuck in first gear only,not just the first chakra...all of them and more. I have a saying " sex can be a wonderful thing,its a nice slice of the pie,I want the whole pie not just the one slice.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 02-18-2019
I just noticed that when I consciously try to imagine something, I only imagine good things happening. Outcomes that will always favour me in whatever I am trying to imagine.
If I am imagining without being conscious, however, some of the old patterns of negative imaginations will still be there but not that much. I've therefore decided to sit and consciously imagine things I want to happen for at-least 15-30 mins a day.
And I dont have to do much, all I do is sit there and tell myself to 'imagine' and observe what comes up.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - MasterEnki - 02-18-2019
‘Improve Your Love Life’ sounds like it will be a great choice for virgins / sexually inexperienced men
DMSI seems more suited for guys who have had some sex. The guys who are getting amazing results with DMSI seem to be the guys who have had heaps of sex / lots of sexual experience.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Roy - 02-18-2019
(02-18-2019, 02:40 PM)MasterEnki Wrote: ‘Improve Your Love Life’ sounds like it will be a great choice for virgins / sexually inexperienced men
DMSI seems more suited for guys who have had some sex. The guys who are getting amazing results with DMSI seem to be the guys who have had heaps of sex / lots of sexual experience.
You are limiting yourself. Guys without much or any experience had success with DMSI.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Broski - 02-18-2019
(02-18-2019, 02:42 PM)Roy Wrote:(02-18-2019, 02:40 PM)MasterEnki Wrote: ‘Improve Your Love Life’ sounds like it will be a great choice for virgins / sexually inexperienced men
DMSI seems more suited for guys who have had some sex. The guys who are getting amazing results with DMSI seem to be the guys who have had heaps of sex / lots of sexual experience.
You are limiting yourself. Guys without much or any experience had success with DMSI.
I was gonna say im pretty sure ive seen reports from multiple guys now who have lost their virginity on dmsi...