Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 02-09-2019

(02-08-2019, 08:33 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(02-08-2019, 02:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-08-2019, 10:28 AM)FluffyBunny Wrote: For DMSI 3.3.1v & Question for Shannon

Has anyone else noticed that on DMSI now that you turned into someone who is more caring?

For some reason, I am getting a genuine caring feeling for these girls that are in my life. Some I have laid some are just girls I've talked to for some time and some are just friends... But for some reason, I can feel it in my heart that I am feeling happy that I care about their well-being.

This description is one type of my personality but I think before it does not come out as often is due to fear of actually caring may turn the girls away. So I am guessing FRM might dissolve some of those fears so this side of my personality is surfacing more?

This feeling feels freer like I am just being myself. But I am not sure how what I described is helping me developing the maximizing sexual irresistibility side?

That is very possibly a significant part of becoming irresistibly attractive. Women want to have sex with men who love women in general, and who are comfortable to be that open to and vulnerable to. You have to think like a woman and from a woman's point of view on this.

Shannon, is this a necessary change that DMSI will have on the user? Do I need to care about/trust girls to have DMSI work?

DMSI is Self Optimizing Polymorphic Scripting. That means it gets into your head and adjusts for whatever you need to achieve the goals of the program. If for you, becoming sexually irresistible means becoming a more caring man, that is what will happen. If for you it means becoming more wealthy, that is what will happen. If for you it means becoming more dominant to the gender you prefer sex with, that is what will happen. If that means you need to look to a country where women think differently, that is what will happen. No two people are alike, so the programming takes that into account and creates the difference between what you are and what you want to be, so you can achieve that goal.

Whatever you need, DMSI will achieve, when you start executing.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Choice - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 04:53 AM)AriGold Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 02:26 AM)DMSIuser78 Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 01:03 AM)AriGold Wrote: I want to repeat what geotrouvetout was saying in his own thread:

"[...] keep this sub sexual free. For sexual improvement there is DMSI [...]"

You have to have a plan or idea in which direction each subliminal it is going. Life Tune Up was always set up as a kind of softer allround subliminal.
If you want more dominance or more specified upon gender then go with alpha.
If you want it more sexual go with sex magnet or DMSI.
If you want it more playful and flirty go with woman magnet.
If you want it more business focussed go with BASE.

So really, if you put "improve your sex life" in LTU, you can also put it in the next BASE because which entrepreneur does not like that improved?

Keep it simple and focused!

Well, LTU is designed to improve all areas of your life. I certainly would consider my sex life an area of my life, which I would like to improve along with any other areas of my life.

Good point, but then you also need the business area and the money/financial area also. And then how about adding "finding the one's true passion".


(01-15-2019, 08:02 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(01-15-2019, 05:49 AM)ichigo Wrote: Any chance of including scripting for finding your passion / purpose in life in LTU, Shannon?

Probably not. I haven't even determined whether I can keep all of the goals and targets in the script already, and adding more seems unlikely. Plus, what happens once you have found it? That instruction will still be telling you to find it. That means it should be a separate title that you can stop using when you find it.



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 01:03 AM)AriGold Wrote: I want to repeat what geotrouvetout was saying in his own thread:

"[...] keep this sub sexual free. For sexual improvement there is DMSI [...]"

You have to have a plan or idea in which direction each subliminal it is going. Life Tune Up was always set up as a kind of softer allround subliminal.
If you want more dominance or more specified upon gender then go with alpha.
If you want it more sexual go with sex magnet or DMSI.
If you want it more playful and flirty go with woman magnet.
If you want it more business focussed go with BASE.

So really, if you put "improve your sex life" in LTU, you can also put it in the next BASE because which entrepreneur does not like that improved?

Keep it simple and focused!

There is a bit of confusion because I posted two different things, apparently. The goal that passes modeling is "improve your love life", not "improve your sex life". Love life can include sex, but primarily deals with your primary relationship(s). I have not quite finished strengthening the required modules (turns out to be four of them intertwined, not just one), and when I finish with that I will model what is best: do I add that or leave it out?

I'm not surprised that love life wins over sex life. I can also see for and against points for including it or leaving it out. So I will let the models guide me.

Whatever the case, the new version will have much better structural strength for handling the process of dealing with what E3 is doing.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 02:45 AM)Determined Wrote: Hey Shannon, what's the go with AM7?

How close are we to achieving 6G technology?

As best I can tell, it will be Beast 19 that achieves design spec in approximately April, May or June of this year. Then I will start mining the technology from B19 and putting it in the 6G skeleton script. I estimate that will take me 4 to 6 months, so 6G should be coming out with the first program around October/November/December of 2019. Then I have the custom multi-stage program to build, and then we can get to AM7. So it will probably be sometime between May and July of next year that I start work on it, and it will probably take me 1 to 2 months to build.

Rough estimate: If I make AM7 the third 6G orogram I build it will probably be released sometime around June 2020 and September 2020.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 05:21 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon,
Is there are direct manifestation scripts included in DMSI? What would we manifestation with DMSI?

Yes, there are actually four different manifestation targets in DMSI, IIRC. They are aimed at manifesting the goals of DMSI and bringing into your life the people who will best result in those goal achievements.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AriGold - 02-09-2019

Ok, then it was a misunderstanding. Thank you for clarifying.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - terry44 - 02-09-2019

@Shannon

Any idea of a rough time frame for USLM4 release?

Thanks


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 07:35 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 01:03 AM)AriGold Wrote: I want to repeat what geotrouvetout was saying in his own thread:

"[...] keep this sub sexual free. For sexual improvement there is DMSI [...]"

You have to have a plan or idea in which direction each subliminal it is going. Life Tune Up was always set up as a kind of softer allround subliminal.
If you want more dominance or more specified upon gender then go with alpha.
If you want it more sexual go with sex magnet or DMSI.
If you want it more playful and flirty go with woman magnet.
If you want it more business focussed go with BASE.

So really, if you put "improve your sex life" in LTU, you can also put it in the next BASE because which entrepreneur does not like that improved?

Keep it simple and focused!

There is a bit of confusion because I posted two different things, apparently. The goal that passes modeling is "improve your love life", not "improve your sex life". Love life can include sex, but primarily deals with your primary relationship(s). I have not quite finished strengthening the required modules (turns out to be four of them intertwined, not just one), and when I finish with that I will model what is best: do I add that or leave it out?

I'm not surprised that love life wins over sex life. I can also see for and against points for including it or leaving it out. So I will let the models guide me.

Whatever the case, the new version will have much better structural strength for handling the process of dealing with what E3 is doing.

I Love the idea of Improving one's Love Life over One's sex Life,in LTU! Im not even using LTU,yet,but at some point I wish to do so. I also Love the idea that the Upgraded version with have better structural strength for handling the processs of dealing with what all E3 is doing,which is kick ass advanced technology. Wow!! "Impressive Luke Skywalker !! Obie One, Has taught chew well !!"


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - findingme - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 07:32 AM)Shannon Wrote: DMSI is Self Optimizing Polymorphic Scripting. That means it gets into your head and adjusts for whatever you need to achieve the goals of the program.

Whatever you need, DMSI will achieve, when you start executing.

Shannon,
The original Universal Detox used polymorphic scripting, and you put the entire program into LTU. Did you make all of LTU polymorphic?

That feature freed me of some core practices while using UD. If all of LTU were polymorphic, it would eliminate a lot of stress and wondering about outcomes, for it would hit my greatest personal needs, even if I am unaware or in denial of them. I'm waiting on my tax refund to pick it up.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - LionKing - 02-09-2019

To me it sounds like Improve your love life would fit in perfectly in LTU. Love and sex are both big things in our lifes, at least on the biological level. Improving on those a little should add up well with improving on the other areas LTU is working on, and the result is a big increase in total awesomeness.

Shannon mentioned needing to add something to USLM to preserve a normal healthy interest in sex. The DMSI sales page strongly advises against using it if in a relationship one would like to keep, ditto for SM. So these are not slightly more sexual - they're so far on the other end that its advised not to run them. So for a general sub like LTU, I think it'd be great to maintain a balance, and balance includes promoting love/sex with the other major areas.

AM is still a different thing; I don't think LTU is intended to be the opposite of AM. And the addition wouldn't have to be gender specific, as even DMSI is not.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 07:35 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 01:03 AM)AriGold Wrote: I want to repeat what geotrouvetout was saying in his own thread:

"[...] keep this sub sexual free. For sexual improvement there is DMSI [...]"

You have to have a plan or idea in which direction each subliminal it is going. Life Tune Up was always set up as a kind of softer allround subliminal.
If you want more dominance or more specified upon gender then go with alpha.
If you want it more sexual go with sex magnet or DMSI.
If you want it more playful and flirty go with woman magnet.
If you want it more business focussed go with BASE.

So really, if you put "improve your sex life" in LTU, you can also put it in the next BASE because which entrepreneur does not like that improved?

Keep it simple and focused!

There is a bit of confusion because I posted two different things, apparently. The goal that passes modeling is "improve your love life", not "improve your sex life". Love life can include sex, but primarily deals with your primary relationship(s). I have not quite finished strengthening the required modules (turns out to be four of them intertwined, not just one), and when I finish with that I will model what is best: do I add that or leave it out?

I'm not surprised that love life wins over sex life. I can also see for and against points for including it or leaving it out. So I will let the models guide me.

Whatever the case, the new version will have much better structural strength for handling the process of dealing with what E3 is doing.

Wait can you rephrase that, I'm not sure what that means.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 08:31 AM)terry44 Wrote: @Shannon

Any idea of a rough time frame for USLM4 release?

Thanks

I'm guilty of estimating too optimistically, I think, so... a week or two? Theoretically it should be that LTU 4.1 gets released tomorrow and then it takes me 2-3 days to release USLM4, but things don't always go according to plan, as we know.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 10:08 AM)findingme Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 07:32 AM)Shannon Wrote: DMSI is Self Optimizing Polymorphic Scripting. That means it gets into your head and adjusts for whatever you need to achieve the goals of the program.

Whatever you need, DMSI will achieve, when you start executing.

Shannon,
The original Universal Detox used polymorphic scripting, and you put the entire program into LTU. Did you make all of LTU polymorphic?

That feature freed me of some core practices while using UD. If all of LTU were polymorphic, it would eliminate a lot of stress and wondering about outcomes, for it would hit my greatest personal needs, even if I am unaware or in denial of them. I'm waiting on my tax refund to pick it up.

All of my scripts have been SOPS for a long time now. It's in everything, the self optimizing polymorphic scripting. It's the standard.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 02-09-2019

(02-09-2019, 10:26 AM)dissonance Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 07:35 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(02-09-2019, 01:03 AM)AriGold Wrote: I want to repeat what geotrouvetout was saying in his own thread:

"[...] keep this sub sexual free. For sexual improvement there is DMSI [...]"

You have to have a plan or idea in which direction each subliminal it is going. Life Tune Up was always set up as a kind of softer allround subliminal.
If you want more dominance or more specified upon gender then go with alpha.
If you want it more sexual go with sex magnet or DMSI.
If you want it more playful and flirty go with woman magnet.
If you want it more business focussed go with BASE.

So really, if you put "improve your sex life" in LTU, you can also put it in the next BASE because which entrepreneur does not like that improved?

Keep it simple and focused!

There is a bit of confusion because I posted two different things, apparently. The goal that passes modeling is "improve your love life", not "improve your sex life". Love life can include sex, but primarily deals with your primary relationship(s). I have not quite finished strengthening the required modules (turns out to be four of them intertwined, not just one), and when I finish with that I will model what is best: do I add that or leave it out?

I'm not surprised that love life wins over sex life. I can also see for and against points for including it or leaving it out. So I will let the models guide me.

Whatever the case, the new version will have much better structural strength for handling the process of dealing with what E3 is doing.

Wait can you rephrase that, I'm not sure what that means.

In E2, there is a module designed to make it easy to consciously handle the process of healing. The process is much more demanding in E3 because the power levels of the program are much higher, so the modules that make dealing with the process easy must be made to match or exceed the challenge E3's process presents. That is what I am doing.