Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-29-2018

(10-28-2018, 04:11 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: @Shannon

Hey mate

After my 2 days break, ive missed 7 days due to our communication and my understanding that I was to fail the 5 loops.

Ill get back onto UMOP, so do I restart the count as day 1 or shall I continue, and this is so that if the sub doesnt work then I get the money back - and of course if it works it gives you fresh data?

Get back on it, and at the end of three months we'll assess whether or not you want a refund. Under normal circunstances, this would have invalidated you, but there are a couple of factors in play that make this a special case, so I'm willing to be flexible in this specific case.

Quote:I am up for jumping on DMSI 3.3 but you said FRM v3 will be included in UMOP so after the full 90 days I can then decide on how to move next based on what subs are available.

All I care about is executing and as you know I have done that in the past with 3.2 at 1 loop. Not at more than 1 loop. So hope you can figure out why i did then and not now.

Only variable was that then I was using headphones.

thanks



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-29-2018

(10-28-2018, 05:26 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: @Shannon I'm glad I could help in some way with my reporting on that. There was something I wanted to ask you regarding This:

Quote:SOPS module

I think this was the second time you mentioned this. Am I to gather that the SOPS will act "sort" of like OE except it will deal even more directly with doing what needs to be done to reach the goal? Like in DMSI it will try to get you to be attracted on all those 130+ metrics you mentioned without them being directly mentioned? In LTU it might increase your cognitive abilities if that is needed in order to get your studies done to "tune up" your life as it were? If so, I will definitely be running LTU for a while then to get my IT stuff done if that is that is the case.

The specific metrics that are being considered by a woman will not always include all 130+ of the metrics I have found. Most of them are universal, some are not. Likewise, they are not the same number or type that straight men have, and may not be the same for gay men, gay women, bisexuals, etc. So to make them effective, we need to set up the program to act on only those metrics that are effective, for each specific case.

So if you're a straight man running DMSI and trying to attract a straight woman, there will be a different set of metrics than if you were looking to attract a bisexual woman. Likewise, each woman has her own unique subset of metrics, and each metric has a unique set of configurations necessary for each woman.

So DMSI is seeking to trigger exactly the right metrics and configure them exactly the right way, no matter who you are as the user, and no matter who they are as the affected, as long as they meet the criteria that you are attracted to sexually.

This specific module would not be included in LTU, because it is too specific in focus. It wouldn't make sense. What you are referring to is covered by OE and other things in LTU.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 10-29-2018

@Shannon I know you have been working on DSMI full blast but have there been any new developments about what will go into LTU 5.5G?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Broski - 10-29-2018

US/LM 2 Update- Day 19(Start of 3rd cycle of 6 days)

So had a brief time frame this weekend when I was out and I felt pretty awesome! Was flowing in the moment, witty as ever, and feeling more relaxed then normal. This only lasted around an hour or so though. The rest of the time lately has mostly been spent frustrated and stuck in my head. Haven't noticed any "lucky" things happen to me as of yet. Success based thinking is also definitely not there yet. Been feeling kind of down and demotivated. Sleep has been pretty trash lately. Maybe FRM2 is still working on things and just bringing some stuff up while it processes it. Will continue going forward with the program and report back later with any new findings and updates.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Broski - 10-29-2018

Hey Shannon,

Also had a question if you don't mind...

If one of ones goals is to expand their consciousness/awareness/being more present, more in touch with truth(whatever you want to refer to it as) can US/LM2 help with that? I know that obviously US/LM is designed to help achieve whatever your goals may be in life, but the reason I ask is because expanding ones consciousnesses is such a unique thing, and ultimately involves transcending the mind at higher levels


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Dilectione - 10-29-2018

Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Broski - 10-29-2018

(10-29-2018, 05:28 PM)Dilectione Wrote: Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya!

I don't think he "makes" any of the subs run on a particular number of loops. I think he just runs the models on what amount of loops will be most effective, then prescribes whatever number they tell him will work best.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Dilectione - 10-29-2018

(10-29-2018, 05:35 PM)Broski Wrote:
(10-29-2018, 05:28 PM)Dilectione Wrote: Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya!

I don't think he "makes" any of the subs run on a particular number of loops. I think he just runs the models on what amount of loops will be most effective, then prescribes whatever number they tell him will work best.

True, that's why I said if possible, I prefer subs with as minimum usage as possible, because in my experience, Shannon subs are very good that brain need time to processing and executing it, and now it's 5.5G, I believe it's way more 'transcoded' than 5G and brain need more time to rest and adjust accordingly.

Still, if possible, 1 loop dmsi gonna be popular Tongue


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - san_hal - 10-29-2018

Shannon mentioned somewhere that sequentially all subs will be 1 loop


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-30-2018

(10-29-2018, 09:46 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon I know you have been working on DSMI full blast but have there been any new developments about what will go into LTU 5.5G?

No. All focus is on DMSI 3.3 and/or advancing the skeleton script.

I am pretty sure what is already set for inclusion will be at or even a little beyond the limit of what I can add. We shall see when the time comes that I can continue working on it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-30-2018

(10-29-2018, 01:47 PM)Broski Wrote: Hey Shannon,

Also had a question if you don't mind...

If one of ones goals is to expand their consciousness/awareness/being more present, more in touch with truth(whatever you want to refer to it as) can US/LM2 help with that? I know that obviously US/LM is designed to help achieve whatever your goals may be in life, but the reason I ask is because expanding ones consciousnesses is such a unique thing, and ultimately involves transcending the mind at higher levels

USLM1 and 2 are both designed to take as your conscious goals the direction of and for the program and the focus of its efforts to make you successful.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-30-2018

(10-29-2018, 05:28 PM)Dilectione Wrote: Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya!

I am doing what I can, but my level of skill and knowledge at this time is going to limit me to whatever is possible according to that. We shall see what the necessary loops are after I have created it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - findingme - 10-30-2018

Does USLM have scripting for an aura?

I've been wondering that since one may project themselves as successful, but I'm unsure if this is from one's changing beliefs or something else entirely. I don't understand how subliminals manifest auras, to be honest.

I also ask since the 4G US script has these messages in it, which may (?) produce an aura:
My body language now says I am ultra-successful.
I now act like I am ultra-successful, and I automatically become ultra-successful.

I looked in the glossary and found nothing on it, and the FAQ section mentioned auras, but assumed understanding of them. Explanations weren't given. I'll take correction if I missed it. I know they are an energy projected, but I'm not understanding how subs create them. Is it scripting or energy sourcing?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - MasterEnki - 10-30-2018

(10-30-2018, 01:03 PM)findingme Wrote: Does USLM have scripting for an aura?

I've been wondering that since one may project themselves as successful, but I'm unsure if this is from one's changing beliefs or something else entirely. I don't understand how subliminals manifest auras, to be honest.

I also ask since the 4G US script has these messages in it, which may (?) produce an aura:
My body language now says I am ultra-successful.
I now act like I am ultra-successful, and I automatically become ultra-successful.

I looked in the glossary and found nothing on it, and the FAQ section mentioned auras, but assumed understanding of them. Explanations weren't given. I'll take correction if I missed it. I know they are an energy projected, but I'm not understanding how subs create them. Is it scripting or energy sourcing?

According to the script library for DAOS 4G,

“I now develop and project an extremely intense, powerful, obvious and effective aura of sexiness”

It seems this is the kind of statement / suggestion that programs the subconscious mind to generate an aura.

I’ve read that deeply held beliefs also affect the aura / personal energies that one has within and around one’s physical body.


It would be interesting to get a Shannon perspective on this subject / question.