Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Determined - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 04:27 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:14 AM)Determined Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:07 AM)kingpill Wrote: @Shannon Does DMSI have something that will make the affected have 'fear' of losing you and think something along the lines of 'this is it. its now or never'? I see girls like me, get happy, but they don't seem to have the fear of losing me, as if I'm gonna be around forever.

That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever.

The feminine is all about flow. If they see you and they smile its a great sign of a healthy connection.

In her eyes, if you're a worthy male, she'll feel like you'll be around forever. Its the natural way of things.

Adding in a fear of loss or a certain possessiveness just gets in the way of actually enjoying someone. The real freedom is in exploring a person without any fear or attachment to outcome.

If she finds you to be an enjoyable experience, she'll keep coming back for more. Same applies vice versa.

Edit: I do like the idea of imbuing her with confidence to approach you, that's a healthy positive mindset. I guess what I'm saying is that fear should be absent from the equation.

Maybe not fear but a logical understanding that if she do t act on her desires she’ll lose you.

Confidence is acting on your desires lol.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 04:34 AM)Determined Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:27 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:14 AM)Determined Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote: That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever.

The feminine is all about flow. If they see you and they smile its a great sign of a healthy connection.

In her eyes, if you're a worthy male, she'll feel like you'll be around forever. Its the natural way of things.

Adding in a fear of loss or a certain possessiveness just gets in the way of actually enjoying someone. The real freedom is in exploring a person without any fear or attachment to outcome.

If she finds you to be an enjoyable experience, she'll keep coming back for more. Same applies vice versa.

Edit: I do like the idea of imbuing her with confidence to approach you, that's a healthy positive mindset. I guess what I'm saying is that fear should be absent from the equation.

Maybe not fear but a logical understanding that if she do t act on her desires she’ll lose you.

Confidence is acting on your desires lol.

I’m talking about that thing Shannon talked about where you don’t jump off a building because you know (instead of fear) that you will die. Same principle. Confidence is good too but there does have to be a consequence to not getting with the user.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-04-2018, 02:41 PM)dissonance Wrote: I feel warmer and much easier to feel sensitive to heat/warmth, and sweat. Like I always say why is it so hot in here, and my family is like it's not hot at all. Can DMSI be making me feel this way 24/7?

Yes. DMSI is designed to get you to project a lot of energy, 24/7. I have used it to keep me warm without a jacket on a walk on a windy pier when it was 47F!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 04:14 AM)Determined Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:07 AM)kingpill Wrote: @Shannon Does DMSI have something that will make the affected have 'fear' of losing you and think something along the lines of 'this is it. its now or never'? I see girls like me, get happy, but they don't seem to have the fear of losing me, as if I'm gonna be around forever.

That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever.

The feminine is all about flow. If they see you and they smile its a great sign of a healthy connection.

In her eyes, if you're a worthy male, she'll feel like you'll be around forever. Its the natural way of things.

Adding in a fear of loss or a certain possessiveness just gets in the way of actually enjoying someone. The real freedom is in exploring a person without any fear or attachment to outcome.

If she finds you to be an enjoyable experience, she'll keep coming back for more. Same applies vice versa.

Edit: I do like the idea of imbuing her with confidence to approach you, that's a healthy positive mindset. I guess what I'm saying is that fear should be absent from the equation.

Hmm, I get you actually, I think I agree with you one letting girls be in the 'flow'.

It's all up to Shannon really and what he thinks would be best for everyone.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-04-2018, 03:18 PM)blth Wrote:
(10-04-2018, 07:07 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-04-2018, 07:02 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: IM going to risk NOT taking a break and seeing what happens there. if theres too much turbulence,I'll take a two or three, day break depending. I don't have the luxury of a week off of USLM,right now. will definitely be updating-keeping posts up to date. Keith.

Theoretically, there should be little to no turbulence because of the similarity of the scripts and the fact that they have virtually identical goals.

Should we finish our cycle or we should continue from where we are in USLM in the new version? For example if i am in day 5 of uslm and you release the update should i count as day 1 or day 6. I am very excited for this but i would be even more excited if you manage to get 2 subs working together

Let's call this new one USML2 for easy reference.

When it comes out, I would like you to choose between waiting 7 days without subs, or just using it right away, switching from it's cycle to the new one calculated for USLM2. This will help us do two types of testing at once.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-04-2018, 03:52 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: I would love to know more about whats actually IN USLM... for example I didnt even know there was
"(It is the result of the program using energy flooding." )energy flooding in USLM,much less confidence and ego balancer... none of these things or otherwise are listed technology'stuff' wise on the USLM page.
.. in the dark about it. I Know your busier than a one legged Man in an Irish Jig Contest,so even if its down the road, it shure would help to KNOW MORE of what all is included in USLM, and hav eit listed as such on the sales page.
it'd be encouraging. thats my 100,000 bucks worth. I aint playin cheap!
going on faith and trust. respectfully. Keith.

Keith, ego balancer and self confidence are (and have for a long time) been in the skeleton script...

USLM consists of a skeleton script, which acts as support for the key and primary scripts. The key and primary scripts tell the subconscious what what the goal is and to some degree, how to do it. You know what's in those.

But what exactly is in the skeleton script is not public. I have to maintain some secrets, because we seem to be breeding competitors like flies lately.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:07 AM)kingpill Wrote: @Shannon Does DMSI have something that will make the affected have 'fear' of losing you and think something along the lines of 'this is it. its now or never'? I see girls like me, get happy, but they don't seem to have the fear of losing me, as if I'm gonna be around forever.

That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever. And maybe the more they come to you or even think of coming to you, the less the fear is, and maybe the more the morphine drip activates for them and their confidence builds up (Im sure Shannons done this though)

DMSI has something in it that makes you irresistibly attractive to them and urges them to act on that attraction. We don't want more fear, we want less. That fear is why they're not acting. If you add fear, we then have to enter an arms race to make one fear greater than the other, and since fear is very much like cancer in how it operates, that's a recipe for a neurotic woman who's terrified of everything.

Triggering morphine drip for them, through an aura, may not be possible. If it is, I'm not sure it's a good idea. Remember, guys... this is not just something you can use and affect others. This can be used to affect you as well. I designed it that way so we would not go too far.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 04:51 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:58 AM)kingpill Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:37 AM)Determined Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 03:07 AM)kingpill Wrote: @Shannon Does DMSI have something that will make the affected have 'fear' of losing you and think something along the lines of 'this is it. its now or never'? I see girls like me, get happy, but they don't seem to have the fear of losing me, as if I'm gonna be around forever.

That's a good thing man. Insecurity only undermines the quality of the relationship.

I understand that, it's true. What I mean is for the girls that don't speak to you but just get happy when they see you- maybe make them somehow feel like if they dont quickly come over and talk to you now- they will lose a certain something they want forever. And maybe the more they come to you or even think of coming to you, the less the fear is, and maybe the more the morphine drip activates for them and their confidence builds up (Im sure Shannons done this though)

DMSI has something in it that makes you irresistibly attractive to them and urges them to act on that attraction. We don't want more fear, we want less. That fear is why they're not acting. If you add fear, we then have to enter an arms race to make one fear greater than the other, and since fear is very much like cancer in how it operates, that's a recipe for a neurotic woman who's terrified of everything.

Triggering morphine drip for them, through an aura, may not be possible. If it is, I'm not sure it's a good idea. Remember, guys... this is not just something you can use and affect others. This can be used to affect you as well. I designed it that way so we would not go too far.

I understand, didn't know fear would inhibit them in that way. Thanks


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 04:52 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.

I’m not following. My idea is sex on demand instead of catch it while it’s there. The latter is scarcity and still puts the woman in the drivers seat. I imagine even the beta chode has as much sex as he’ll allow. doesnt mean it’s being offered though does it?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 05:06 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:52 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.

I’m not following. My idea is sex on demand instead of catch it while it’s there. The latter is scarcity and still puts the woman in the drivers seat. I imagine even the beta chode has as much sex as he’ll allow. doesnt mean it’s being offered though does it?

You're definitely not following. People are using that to shut down execution by not allowing any sex. Out of fear. When they have no real reason otherwise to do so. People who are free and clear to have sex with whomever offers. And are getting offers. Which they do not allow. Because of fear.

The idea is that you have an abundance of offers of sex and interested parties, and you decide who, when, where and how much.

But switching it to "as much sex as the user wants" does and changes nothing in this case, because the user's dominant desire is what they already have, or it wouldn't be what they already have. And in almost all cases of resistance on this point, it will be because the dominant part of them desires not to have sex, and it is dominating the will of their conscious desire to have sex. In some cases, it is even dominating their conscious awareness that they even want sex.

So no amount of alpha or beta or whatever is going to matter. What you allow of what you're being offered is what you want. And what you're being offered is an entirely different thing. The whole goal of DMSI is sex on demand.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 05:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 05:06 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:52 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.

I’m not following. My idea is sex on demand instead of catch it while it’s there. The latter is scarcity and still puts the woman in the drivers seat. I imagine even the beta chode has as much sex as he’ll allow. doesnt mean it’s being offered though does it?

You're definitely not following. People are using that to shut down execution by not allowing any sex. Out of fear. When they have no real reason otherwise to do so. People who are free and clear to have sex with whomever offers. And are getting offers. Which they do not allow. Because of fear.

The idea is that you have an abundance of offers of sex and interested parties, and you decide who, when, where and how much.

But switching it to "as much sex as the user wants" does and changes nothing in this case, because the user's dominant desire is what they already have, or it wouldn't be what they already have. And in almost all cases of resistance on this point, it will be because the dominant part of them desires not to have sex, and it is dominating the will of their conscious desire to have sex. In some cases, it is even dominating their conscious awareness that they even want sex.

So no amount of alpha or beta or whatever is going to matter. What you allow of what you're being offered is what you want. And what you're being offered is an entirely different thing. The whole goal of DMSI is sex on demand.

I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 05:24 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 05:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 05:06 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:52 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 04:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I wonder if switching it from "As much sex as the user will allow" to "as much sex as the user wants" would be a useful change.

And you think anyone would really allow more sex than they want when they're using that as a loophole to shutdown execution?

It's not about that. It's about preventing the fear from shutting down how much the dominant part of them wants and allows sex.

I’m not following. My idea is sex on demand instead of catch it while it’s there. The latter is scarcity and still puts the woman in the drivers seat. I imagine even the beta chode has as much sex as he’ll allow. doesnt mean it’s being offered though does it?

You're definitely not following. People are using that to shut down execution by not allowing any sex. Out of fear. When they have no real reason otherwise to do so. People who are free and clear to have sex with whomever offers. And are getting offers. Which they do not allow. Because of fear.

The idea is that you have an abundance of offers of sex and interested parties, and you decide who, when, where and how much.

But switching it to "as much sex as the user wants" does and changes nothing in this case, because the user's dominant desire is what they already have, or it wouldn't be what they already have. And in almost all cases of resistance on this point, it will be because the dominant part of them desires not to have sex, and it is dominating the will of their conscious desire to have sex. In some cases, it is even dominating their conscious awareness that they even want sex.

So no amount of alpha or beta or whatever is going to matter. What you allow of what you're being offered is what you want. And what you're being offered is an entirely different thing. The whole goal of DMSI is sex on demand.

I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.

Okay, Sarge, let's go back a bit and clarify something.

In life, whatever you are experiencing is the result of whatever your dominant desires are. And your dominant desires are often those of your subconscious, and disagree with those of your conscious. When this happens, people show up here looking for a solution.

So in that sense, your experiences have been, so far, what your dominant will has been, which is differing from your conscious desires, so it must be your subconscious desires and will.

Now, this disagreement is blocking you from getting very far, even with DMSI, although from what I have seen you report it seems DMSI is making some difference. And your issue once you have it offered isn't shutting it down, because you allow it to the best of your ability at a conscious level.

What I'm talking about is people who, if they cannot stop DMSI from executing, shut down their interest in the offers they get. They use that as a defense of last resort, refusing what executing DMSI has accomplished.

So in those cases where they execute DMSI and its instructions become their dominant will while they do, those people achieve the goals of the program because they are executing the script, but then they refuse to allow sex or escalation on what their previous execution caused and procured for them.

For example, there have been reports from people who said that they had hotties becoming interested and then they found excuses why they should reject those advances. Or they talk themselves into believing they really were not advances or interest, and ignore them. These are a refusal to ALLOW SEX. They have access to it, but they refuse to allow it.

Because, out of fear, they don't want it. And in this case, what you want and what you allow are the same thing.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kol - 10-05-2018

Shannon, does DMSI has something in the script regarding spontaneous visualisations involving the senses, like, experience lucid experiences of women making out with me, having scenarios popping up and so on? Is it subconscious training?