Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-03-2018

(10-03-2018, 09:19 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 07:48 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 06:46 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 04:39 AM)cataleya Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 03:06 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Quick question to all:

How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?

Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.

Thank you all.

Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.

I would get 4 hours in the evening when I`m chilling at home. And the remaining 7 hours while I sleep.

Thank you. I unfortunately cannot do that as the 11hours have to be continuous without any stoppage.

It seems 5hours may be still the most likely way for me even though I would love to do the 11.

Where there is a will, there is a way. I never have trouble finding a way to do 11 loops a day if that's what I want to do. Even a low battery rarely stops me, because I have a 10,000 mAh battery pack in my car, always charged up and ready to go. The truth is, you (or some part of you) doesn't want to do 11 loops because it may achieve the goals.

@Shannon Thanks buddy.

Ive replied to you on my thread but im trying hard to find a way to do 11loops. I dont want to use a phone as the speakers arent great and this has been tested before. I also now only 1 have phone and I am always getting texts and calls. 11loops means 12hours 28mins and thus very likely calls will pause the play at the very least. - (I cannot be out of phone reach for 12hours).

I am looking at another option. If the price of this option/phone stays the same and doesn't go up then I could purchase this I feel in 30days time approximately and then use ultra silent and play it no matter where I go.

Based on your modelling (ive asked this in my thread), will 30days wait be okay or will that change the results of 11loops and 5loops that you found?

If it will then I will choose 5 loops as the most credible option and start on that otherwise wait the 30days see if I can afford to buy the phone that plays 20khz and play 11loops otherwise start on 5loops then too.

thank you again.

For any forecast made for anything in any way, there is a phenomenon known as the Window of Validity. During that period of time after the forecast is made, it is valid, because the variables in play have not changed sufficiently to invalidate it.

After they change sufficiently, it is no longer valid. This window is usually a maximum of about 3 days.

I would just get started now with whatever is possible for you to do.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 10-03-2018

Shannons words:
I have an idea.

I said I would rebuild USLM to add in the ASS/ART left out in B side that prevents infections. I don't think you guys really were getting infections because of that omission, but... since I have to rebuild it anyway to add that, since I said I would, this strikes me as a potential way to test v2 of the Fear Removal Modules a little bit before we get DMSI 3.3 out the door. And since this would be a free upgrade for anyone who bought USLM B side when it was released, we have an instant supply of testers!

I have also decided to try to change the Luck Magnifier part of the script to a Luck Maximizer and see how far I can push this right now. I'll be doing this round robin with DMSI, because we are making really good progress on 3.3 right now. Today I'm working on v2 of the fear removal modules in DMSI 3.3, and tomorrow I will bring that across to USLM's upgrade and rebuild B side for you guys.

If that works as planned, I may be able to use the new USLM to allow me to successfully build DMSI and LTU at the same time.

Let's see what we can do.


My response"
DO you think you could ADD some CONFIDENCE affirmations in there,as well Shannon,if they're not already in USLM,along with some ego balancer,so as to be REAL CONFIDENT, but not overly cocky?
Luck Maximizer....dayummmm !! Brilliant.Maximizing the Success. Ultra Success Maximizer,I Love ya Baby!! Sounds like Luck Maximizer equals HIGH volocity Luck...hummm this could get interesting.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 10-03-2018

Having some fears about the fear removal...Ha! Its the Unknown,is what it really is.
the fear of death and the fear of the unknown are two of mankinds biggest fears. Incidentally these two fears are what ,we allow to,keep Us from Living fully!!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Hatman - 10-03-2018

I am beyond excited right now!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 10-03-2018

Thank you @Shannon


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 10-03-2018

[/quote] have also decided to try to change the Luck Magnifier part of the script to a Luck Maximizer and see how far I can push this right now. I'll be doing this round robin with DMSI, because we are making really good progress on 3.3 right now. Today I'm working on v2 of the fear removal modules in DMSI 3.3, and tomorrow I will bring that across to USLM's upgrade and rebuild B side for you guys.[/quote]

@Shannon

How far will you maximize luck and push it in the new USLM side B?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarthXedonias - 10-03-2018

@Shannon Hey, I did want to get your opinion since I saw your post. I do want to try out the new US/LM B side when it comes out to test out the new fear removal modules and give valuable feedback but at the same time I realized early on that I was still having an issue with lack of motivation to get stuff done and would still procrastinate, hence why I've been on UM/OP the last couple of weeks. I know that if the fear removal modules are successful on US/LM I will probably get UM/OP as a side effect of executing though I'm not too sure. What would be your suggestion? I just want to make sure I don't mess up the good thing I have going at the moment with quickly knocking out my courses at the moment.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-03-2018

(10-03-2018, 10:29 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannons words:
I have an idea.

I said I would rebuild USLM to add in the ASS/ART left out in B side that prevents infections. I don't think you guys really were getting infections because of that omission, but... since I have to rebuild it anyway to add that, since I said I would, this strikes me as a potential way to test v2 of the Fear Removal Modules a little bit before we get DMSI 3.3 out the door. And since this would be a free upgrade for anyone who bought USLM B side when it was released, we have an instant supply of testers!

I have also decided to try to change the Luck Magnifier part of the script to a Luck Maximizer and see how far I can push this right now. I'll be doing this round robin with DMSI, because we are making really good progress on 3.3 right now. Today I'm working on v2 of the fear removal modules in DMSI 3.3, and tomorrow I will bring that across to USLM's upgrade and rebuild B side for you guys.

If that works as planned, I may be able to use the new USLM to allow me to successfully build DMSI and LTU at the same time.

Let's see what we can do.


My response"
DO you think you could ADD some CONFIDENCE affirmations in there,as well Shannon,if they're not already in USLM,along with some ego balancer,so as to be REAL CONFIDENT, but not overly cocky?
Luck Maximizer....dayummmm !! Brilliant.Maximizing the Success. Ultra Success Maximizer,I Love ya Baby!! Sounds like Luck Maximizer equals HIGH volocity Luck...hummm this could get interesting.

Those things are already present in the skeleton script. I can't push them any further without causing issues with development as it is right now.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - bits - 10-03-2018

(10-02-2018, 06:01 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 02:47 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:
(10-01-2018, 07:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I actually agree with this. Darkness put it very well and you too k-train. It’s like the anti sniper argument. We can always make sure we’re using protection during sex.

That's pretty much my thoughts as well. If its not going to do any harm, then just let it be. If a guy does sleep with a woman without protection (which we on this board on several occasions have said he should be using) that's honestly on him and if he falls for the old line of "I can't get pregnant, blah, blah, blah" then that's also on him if he buys that line. Obviously, there are women who can't have kids but I can't tell you how many times I've heard of guys falling for that when the woman knows full well she can get pregnant.

While I'm not worried about getting manipulated into having more kids, my concern is the women we're disqualifying b/c they have no interest in having kids, ever, with anyone. A lot of women are just looking to have a good time. At the least, adding in "fun" instead of going full-court-press on "baby rabies" seems like the better route to me.

I'm for whatever Shannon deems best after modeling the options.

I wouldn't look at it as a disqualifier, if a woman has super high attraction to you she's going to want your babies, all life is driven towards reproduction and humans are just sorting out who they want to reproduce with. I guess there could be a "no babies" module added but now again more and more is being added to the program that's likely going to cause more energy use and possible resistance.

How in the world one can be both highly attracted towards somebody to the point of "reversing the roles" and chasing sex with a guy and also think "eww no i wouldn't want babies with THAT guy" is beyond me.

Not to mention, ONE person has mentioned it, we don't know that girl so we can't say if she had baby rabies before meeting him, she felt he was her 1 soulmate, if she was using it as a joke/metaphor as many young girls do, or if she was just flat out insane.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-03-2018

(10-03-2018, 10:36 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Having some fears about the fear removal...Ha! Its the Unknown,is what it really is.
the fear of death and the fear of the unknown are two of mankinds biggest fears. Incidentally these two fears are what ,we allow to,keep Us from Living fully!!

Yes, it is the fear of the unknown.

Removing fear, when it is so fractal and holographic in nature, as well as being irrational and self regenerating, is almost impossible.

I know there is a way to do it, however, and I'm determined to do exactly that.

I'm still trying to figure out exactly how to adjust the modules, but I'm making progress. This could take a day or three though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-03-2018

have also decided to try to change the Luck Magnifier part of the script to a Luck Maximizer and see how far I can push this right now. I'll be doing this round robin with DMSI, because we are making really good progress on 3.3 right now. Today I'm working on v2 of the fear removal modules in DMSI 3.3, and tomorrow I will bring that across to USLM's upgrade and rebuild B side for you guys.[/quote]

@Shannon

How far will you maximize luck and push it in the new USLM side B?
[/quote]

As much as I can without having to alter the skeleton script to do it, or spend a lot of time. How far that turns out to be, we shall see. I just want it to go as far as possible right now, so I can use it to be as successful as possible with what I'm working on right now.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-03-2018

(10-03-2018, 01:02 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: @Shannon Hey, I did want to get your opinion since I saw your post. I do want to try out the new US/LM B side when it comes out to test out the new fear removal modules and give valuable feedback but at the same time I realized early on that I was still having an issue with lack of motivation to get stuff done and would still procrastinate, hence why I've been on UM/OP the last couple of weeks. I know that if the fear removal modules are successful on US/LM I will probably get UM/OP as a side effect of executing though I'm not too sure. What would be your suggestion? I just want to make sure I don't mess up the good thing I have going at the moment with quickly knocking out my courses at the moment.

You know I can't decide which one you should do. I suggest you consider your options carefully, and decide based on what feels like the best option.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - blth - 10-03-2018

Is there an estimation date for the uslm update?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 10-03-2018

(10-03-2018, 01:17 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 10:36 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Having some fears about the fear removal...Ha! Its the Unknown,is what it really is.
the fear of death and the fear of the unknown are two of mankinds biggest fears. Incidentally these two fears are what ,we allow to,keep Us from Living fully!!

Yes, it is the fear of the unknown.

Removing fear, when it is so fractal and holographic in nature, as well as being irrational and self regenerating, is almost impossible.

I know there is a way to do it, however, and I'm determined to do exactly that.

I'm still trying to figure out exactly how to adjust the modules, but I'm making progress. This could take a day or three though.


Very encouraging!! All sounds very promising,very promising indeed!!
Thank you fer taking the time to answer my two questions and more.