Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - MasterEnki - 10-01-2018

(10-01-2018, 07:44 PM)Cyanide Wrote: Huh it's like they didn't even read my post... Weird...

I tend to reply on my phone most the time. I can’t seem to work out how to reply (on mobile) to a post, without all the blue wall text being quoted.

But I agree that huge blue walls of text are annoying at times.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - josh84 - 10-01-2018

Hi Shannon, i have been off dmsi for 42 days now so far since you mentioned when to stop and see if any bloom happens, no effects like that has happened while on the break.

Will dmsi be a november release or potentially could be released this month?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarthXedonias - 10-02-2018

(10-01-2018, 07:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I actually agree with this. Darkness put it very well and you too k-train. It’s like the anti sniper argument. We can always make sure we’re using protection during sex.

That's pretty much my thoughts as well. If its not going to do any harm, then just let it be. If a guy does sleep with a woman without protection (which we on this board on several occasions have said he should be using) that's honestly on him and if he falls for the old line of "I can't get pregnant, blah, blah, blah" then that's also on him if he buys that line. Obviously, there are women who can't have kids but I can't tell you how many times I've heard of guys falling for that when the woman knows full well she can get pregnant.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 10-02-2018

Use protection to stay away from a deadly or inconvenient disease.

For those of us that are men remember how awful we felt with a simple sore throat and realise how worse a disease would be for us.

Respect her and wear protection and yourself atleast until you're both tested and want to remain in a monogamous faithful relationship.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 10-02-2018

Quick question to all:

How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?

Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.

Thank you all.

Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - cataleya - 10-02-2018

(10-02-2018, 03:06 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Quick question to all:

How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?

Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.

Thank you all.

Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.

I would get 4 hours in the evening when I`m chilling at home. And the remaining 7 hours while I sleep.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-02-2018

(10-01-2018, 06:07 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: Out of curiosity, how do you go about putting an individual through the models without actually knowing them?

Can't tell you that without giving away secrets about the models I don't want to give away.

Quote:Are you truly able to learn enough about them through their posts to model their results? [quote]

Apparently I can.

[quote]
What exactly do you need to know about someone in order to put them through your models?

Those specific factors that I need to plug in are in part already in place because they have been pre-calculated using certain other factors which when properly manipulated in the right algorithm result in certain of the factors necessary. This only works after a very large number of runs of the models and the resulting refining of the database it uses.

There are a lot of variables and factors necessary, but the models can directly calculate or indirectly calculate a lot of them at this point.

Specifically what I need to know, can't reveal that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 10-02-2018

(10-02-2018, 02:47 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:
(10-01-2018, 07:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I actually agree with this. Darkness put it very well and you too k-train. It’s like the anti sniper argument. We can always make sure we’re using protection during sex.

That's pretty much my thoughts as well. If its not going to do any harm, then just let it be. If a guy does sleep with a woman without protection (which we on this board on several occasions have said he should be using) that's honestly on him and if he falls for the old line of "I can't get pregnant, blah, blah, blah" then that's also on him if he buys that line. Obviously, there are women who can't have kids but I can't tell you how many times I've heard of guys falling for that when the woman knows full well she can get pregnant.

While I'm not worried about getting manipulated into having more kids, my concern is the women we're disqualifying b/c they have no interest in having kids, ever, with anyone. A lot of women are just looking to have a good time. At the least, adding in "fun" instead of going full-court-press on "baby rabies" seems like the better route to me.

I'm for whatever Shannon deems best after modeling the options.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-02-2018

(10-02-2018, 06:01 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 02:47 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:
(10-01-2018, 07:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I actually agree with this. Darkness put it very well and you too k-train. It’s like the anti sniper argument. We can always make sure we’re using protection during sex.

That's pretty much my thoughts as well. If its not going to do any harm, then just let it be. If a guy does sleep with a woman without protection (which we on this board on several occasions have said he should be using) that's honestly on him and if he falls for the old line of "I can't get pregnant, blah, blah, blah" then that's also on him if he buys that line. Obviously, there are women who can't have kids but I can't tell you how many times I've heard of guys falling for that when the woman knows full well she can get pregnant.

While I'm not worried about getting manipulated into having more kids, my concern is the women we're disqualifying b/c they have no interest in having kids, ever, with anyone. A lot of women are just looking to have a good time. At the least, adding in "fun" instead of going full-court-press on "baby rabies" seems like the better route to me.

I'm for whatever Shannon deems best after modeling the options.

Remember that DMSI is unisex, and women can use it to affect men too.

But I will be checking on the best option between focusing on the current goal, which seems to produce baby rabies; sex for fun; or some combination of the two.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-02-2018

(10-01-2018, 09:36 AM)Hatman Wrote:
(10-01-2018, 08:41 AM)Shannon Wrote: UMOP is not included in USLM as a goal or subgoal. The motivation is a natural side effect of USLM.

Sorry, that wasn't a serious statement, hence why I used a meme. Rolleyes

My motivation and productivity has been through the roof lately under USLM and it made me realize that I'll probably never run UMOP even though I have it. I rather have this motivation and focus it towards success rather have it just for the sake of it. Thanks for changing my mind lol

Sometimes I can't tell if it's serious or not, and if that is the case, I need to presume it is to keep others from becoming confused.

USLM and UMOP take different routes, but they both result in motivation that you enjoy when you execute.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 10-02-2018

(10-02-2018, 04:39 AM)cataleya Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 03:06 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Quick question to all:

How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?

Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.

Thank you all.

Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.

I would get 4 hours in the evening when I`m chilling at home. And the remaining 7 hours while I sleep.

Thank you. I unfortunately cannot do that as the 11hours have to be continuous without any stoppage.

It seems 5hours may be still the most likely way for me even though I would love to do the 11.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 10-02-2018

(10-02-2018, 06:46 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 04:39 AM)cataleya Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 03:06 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Quick question to all:

How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?

Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.

Thank you all.

Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.

I would get 4 hours in the evening when I`m chilling at home. And the remaining 7 hours while I sleep.

Thank you. I unfortunately cannot do that as the 11hours have to be continuous without any stoppage.

It seems 5hours may be still the most likely way for me even though I would love to do the 11.

New phones have decent speakers I think the diff in effictiveness will be really low. So if you want you can use your phone and play it 2-3 hours before you go to bed. By the time you wake up you may have 1 or 2 hours left only.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 10-02-2018

(10-02-2018, 06:46 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 04:39 AM)cataleya Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 03:06 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Quick question to all:

How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?

Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.

Thank you all.

Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.

I would get 4 hours in the evening when I`m chilling at home. And the remaining 7 hours while I sleep.

Thank you. I unfortunately cannot do that as the 11hours have to be continuous without any stoppage.

It seems 5hours may be still the most likely way for me even though I would love to do the 11.

I'm the dork who'd walk around with a small bluetooth speaker everywhere I went. I'm gonna get my damn loops in, no matter what. UMOP is not a program that would be detrimental to expose certain people to, so...If you want to get it done, you'll get it done.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - CatMan - 10-02-2018

(10-02-2018, 06:51 AM)RTBoss Wrote: I'm the dork who'd walk around with a small bluetooth speaker everywhere I went. I'm gonna get my damn loops in, no matter what. UMOP is not a program that would be detrimental to expose certain people to, so...If you want to get it done, you'll get it done.

Reminds me of the days I wore headphones all day long, then night stand speaker during sleep. To make sure I got my 21 hours a day of listening in during 5G. People thought I was nuts.

I am...lmao...but I just wanted that max listening time, haha.

It's so nice to not have to do insane hours anymore, lol.

If you want to do it, you'll make it happen, Jake. Exactly right.