Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 09-07-2018

(09-07-2018, 08:57 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 01:12 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 11:15 AM)lano1106 Wrote: To me, DMSI and SM3 achieve the same goal by taking different paths. I think that SM3 may have a strong appeal to some of us despite the old technologies because of the story/script that it is telling.

Yeah, what I like about SM is the fact that it empowers the man to do the job instead of waiting for the woman doing it. And I think there are other people who like that, too, even if it might not be necessary if DMSI succeeds.

SM doesn't empower you to do the job any more or less than DMSI does. It also doesn't make you wait for the woman to do it any more or less than DMSI does. It's furthering AM6, which is focusing you into a more active, masculine approach. But herein lies the rub:

Most of you associate "being a man" with "hunting woman". But who is more a man? A guy who goes to the gym, gets ripped and then goes out and hits on women, gives them the power by putting her in a position to reject or accept his advances, and then gets shot down 90%+ of the time, or the guy who doesn't go to the gym, isn't ripped, and has almost every attractive women doing tricks and making the moves to try to get him to **** them, while he goes about his life doing his thing and not worrying about women or sex?

The answer is that "which one is more a man" is a red herring. Neither is "more a man". But the guy who doesn't really try, but gets the attention, interest and sex anyway, is HIGHER VALUE, which is why he doesn't have to try.

The more you try, the lower your perceived value is to high value women. The less you try - while still interesting, attracting and getting the high value women, the higher your perceived value is to them.

Women want a man who is at least as valuable as they are, and preferably more so. You guys are all about going out and hunting them, and you go out and hunt them and try and try and try, and you peg yourself as not being at the very high levels of value by doing so. The harder he must try, the lower his value must be, she thinks. And that is instinctive for her. It may not even be something she is consciously aware of at all.

So a man who executes DMSI is always going to get swamped with interest because he is perceived as being so high value. He didn't have to do anything, and yet here these hot women are all noticing him, and noticing each other notice him, and competing for him. The only thing stopping you guys is...

1. You're stuck on the belief that "REAL men go hunt their pussy down", which makes you afraid to execute DMSI because you're worried that you can't approach while using DMSI (wrong), and not approaching makes you somehow less of a "real man", and
2. See #1.

I was just thinking that with SM the programming would rather become permanent than with DMSI and when using other subs I would be able to get some women even if I don't have the aura supporting me. That is my primary concern about it. And, I think you said it too once, it can be fun to go hunting even if you don't need to. But, anyway, if DMSI works SM becomes low priority either way. Still, when other important programs are upgraded doing a poll in regard to SM could be useful to see if people are interested in that sub at all and then decide.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 09-07-2018

By the way, I had the impression that women perceive me more creepy than usual. They tend to walk away fast recently and stuff. So either becoming creepy is a nice escape to the sub or I am interpreting thing wrong. But maybe going away is just preventing just them from executing and going for the user.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 09-07-2018

Funny how I keep meeting up with old friends on 3.2. I've met 3 old friends on the 4 months I been on the sub that I haven't seen for years.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarthXedonias - 09-07-2018

(09-07-2018, 12:10 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(09-07-2018, 08:57 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 01:12 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 11:15 AM)lano1106 Wrote: To me, DMSI and SM3 achieve the same goal by taking different paths. I think that SM3 may have a strong appeal to some of us despite the old technologies because of the story/script that it is telling.

Yeah, what I like about SM is the fact that it empowers the man to do the job instead of waiting for the woman doing it. And I think there are other people who like that, too, even if it might not be necessary if DMSI succeeds.

SM doesn't empower you to do the job any more or less than DMSI does. It also doesn't make you wait for the woman to do it any more or less than DMSI does. It's furthering AM6, which is focusing you into a more active, masculine approach. But herein lies the rub:

Most of you associate "being a man" with "hunting woman". But who is more a man? A guy who goes to the gym, gets ripped and then goes out and hits on women, gives them the power by putting her in a position to reject or accept his advances, and then gets shot down 90%+ of the time, or the guy who doesn't go to the gym, isn't ripped, and has almost every attractive women doing tricks and making the moves to try to get him to **** them, while he goes about his life doing his thing and not worrying about women or sex?

The answer is that "which one is more a man" is a red herring. Neither is "more a man". But the guy who doesn't really try, but gets the attention, interest and sex anyway, is HIGHER VALUE, which is why he doesn't have to try.

The more you try, the lower your perceived value is to high value women. The less you try - while still interesting, attracting and getting the high value women, the higher your perceived value is to them.

Women want a man who is at least as valuable as they are, and preferably more so. You guys are all about going out and hunting them, and you go out and hunt them and try and try and try, and you peg yourself as not being at the very high levels of value by doing so. The harder he must try, the lower his value must be, she thinks. And that is instinctive for her. It may not even be something she is consciously aware of at all.

So a man who executes DMSI is always going to get swamped with interest because he is perceived as being so high value. He didn't have to do anything, and yet here these hot women are all noticing him, and noticing each other notice him, and competing for him. The only thing stopping you guys is...

1. You're stuck on the belief that "REAL men go hunt their pussy down", which makes you afraid to execute DMSI because you're worried that you can't approach while using DMSI (wrong), and not approaching makes you somehow less of a "real man", and
2. See #1.

I was just thinking that with SM the programming would rather become permanent than with DMSI and when using other subs I would be able to get some women even if I don't have the aura supporting me. That is my primary concern about it. And, I think you said it too once, it can be fun to go hunting even if you don't need to. But, anyway, if DMSI works SM becomes low priority either way. Still, when other important programs are upgraded doing a poll in regard to SM could be useful to see if people are interested in that sub at all and then decide.

Actually I believe that has already been addressed. The aura would obviously not be permanent (too energy intensive for the subconscious to want to continually do it without being prompted to) but the other things (like body language, mannerisms, etc) should be permanent. Shannon had mentioned to me in my journal that certain things in 3.2 should remain permanent even after you discontinue use (for example, I decided to go to a trip to the Philippines, etc after I had already stopped running 3.2 for quite a while). Also, the Aura in SM and WM don't last either. If I remember correctly from older journals the auras only last for at most a few months after your stop using those programs but the other things should remain. So in either case the Auras are going to diminish in either program but the non-aura stuff will be permanent.

As for the "hunting" issue I think he already said it just a few post earlier DMSI even though its main thing is to have women approach you it "does not" stop you from hunting if you want to. For example:

"1. You're stuck on the belief that "REAL men go hunt their pussy down", which makes you afraid to execute DMSI because you're worried that you can't approach while using DMSI (wrong), and not approaching makes you somehow less of a "real man", and"

Point is the Aura for either program isn't going to be permanent and the non-aura parts are going to be permanent if you used the program long enough to make them permanent. DMSI doesn't "prevent" you from approaching for fun. Only difference seems to be the power of the programs and the fact that DMSI tries to use every approach possible to make your more attractive while SM only takes one particular approach.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 09-07-2018

Shannon, are the sexual performance modules from 3.2 supposed to become permanent?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 09-07-2018

(09-07-2018, 01:40 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: As for the "hunting" issue I think he already said it just a few post earlier DMSI even though its main thing is to have women approach you it "does not" stop you from hunting if you want to. For example:

"1. You're stuck on the belief that "REAL men go hunt their pussy down", which makes you afraid to execute DMSI because you're worried that you can't approach while using DMSI (wrong), and not approaching makes you somehow less of a "real man", and"

Point is the Aura for either program isn't going to be permanent and the non-aura parts are going to be permanent if you used the program long enough to make them permanent. DMSI doesn't "prevent" you from approaching for fun. Only difference seems to be the power of the programs and the fact that DMSI tries to use every approach possible to make your more attractive while SM only takes one particular approach.

Yes, it doesn't prevent approaching, but SM was more of unlocking the man to approach and successfully seduce which is especially helpful if you can't do this right now. This is the part I believe DMSI is missing somehow as the goal is the opposite - to make the man that high value that women approach him. However, if the aura fades this will probably fade, too. And enabling the man to do the job should last. That's why I still think SM could be interesting in future. And, yes, some effects of DMSI seem lasting but are especially noticeable if the programming gets powered, even by another sub which creates some energy overshot.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 09-07-2018

(09-07-2018, 12:10 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(09-07-2018, 08:57 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 01:12 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 11:15 AM)lano1106 Wrote: To me, DMSI and SM3 achieve the same goal by taking different paths. I think that SM3 may have a strong appeal to some of us despite the old technologies because of the story/script that it is telling.

Yeah, what I like about SM is the fact that it empowers the man to do the job instead of waiting for the woman doing it. And I think there are other people who like that, too, even if it might not be necessary if DMSI succeeds.

SM doesn't empower you to do the job any more or less than DMSI does. It also doesn't make you wait for the woman to do it any more or less than DMSI does. It's furthering AM6, which is focusing you into a more active, masculine approach. But herein lies the rub:

Most of you associate "being a man" with "hunting woman". But who is more a man? A guy who goes to the gym, gets ripped and then goes out and hits on women, gives them the power by putting her in a position to reject or accept his advances, and then gets shot down 90%+ of the time, or the guy who doesn't go to the gym, isn't ripped, and has almost every attractive women doing tricks and making the moves to try to get him to **** them, while he goes about his life doing his thing and not worrying about women or sex?

The answer is that "which one is more a man" is a red herring. Neither is "more a man". But the guy who doesn't really try, but gets the attention, interest and sex anyway, is HIGHER VALUE, which is why he doesn't have to try.

The more you try, the lower your perceived value is to high value women. The less you try - while still interesting, attracting and getting the high value women, the higher your perceived value is to them.

Women want a man who is at least as valuable as they are, and preferably more so. You guys are all about going out and hunting them, and you go out and hunt them and try and try and try, and you peg yourself as not being at the very high levels of value by doing so. The harder he must try, the lower his value must be, she thinks. And that is instinctive for her. It may not even be something she is consciously aware of at all.

So a man who executes DMSI is always going to get swamped with interest because he is perceived as being so high value. He didn't have to do anything, and yet here these hot women are all noticing him, and noticing each other notice him, and competing for him. The only thing stopping you guys is...

1. You're stuck on the belief that "REAL men go hunt their pussy down", which makes you afraid to execute DMSI because you're worried that you can't approach while using DMSI (wrong), and not approaching makes you somehow less of a "real man", and
2. See #1.

I was just thinking that with SM the programming would rather become permanent than with DMSI and when using other subs I would be able to get some women even if I don't have the aura supporting me. That is my primary concern about it. And, I think you said it too once, it can be fun to go hunting even if you don't need to. But, anyway, if DMSI works SM becomes low priority either way. Still, when other important programs are upgraded doing a poll in regard to SM could be useful to see if people are interested in that sub at all and then decide.

I think SM changes are permanent once the subliminal has been listened to enough times. In the case of DMSI i do not believe the aura is permanent as I am sure Shannon did say that it would be unhealthy to have the aura running on all the time. So once DMSi is stopped the aura will eventually dissipate.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - blth - 09-07-2018

I am using uslm hybrid flac trickling stream. Sometimes i can listen the noise of the silent part and sometimes not. I used winmd5 and files matched. Is this normal? Also time 1 hour and 6 minutes and 500mb file seem fine and not corrupted

When i am using the masked trickling stream the high feeling i get is more intense and last longer. Would you recommend using masked over hybrid because i get better response or should i stick to hybrid because it is stronger and eventually i should get even better results?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Nox - 09-08-2018

(09-07-2018, 08:23 PM)thor2014 Wrote:
(09-07-2018, 12:10 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(09-07-2018, 08:57 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 01:12 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 11:15 AM)lano1106 Wrote: To me, DMSI and SM3 achieve the same goal by taking different paths. I think that SM3 may have a strong appeal to some of us despite the old technologies because of the story/script that it is telling.

Yeah, what I like about SM is the fact that it empowers the man to do the job instead of waiting for the woman doing it. And I think there are other people who like that, too, even if it might not be necessary if DMSI succeeds.

SM doesn't empower you to do the job any more or less than DMSI does. It also doesn't make you wait for the woman to do it any more or less than DMSI does. It's furthering AM6, which is focusing you into a more active, masculine approach. But herein lies the rub:

Most of you associate "being a man" with "hunting woman". But who is more a man? A guy who goes to the gym, gets ripped and then goes out and hits on women, gives them the power by putting her in a position to reject or accept his advances, and then gets shot down 90%+ of the time, or the guy who doesn't go to the gym, isn't ripped, and has almost every attractive women doing tricks and making the moves to try to get him to **** them, while he goes about his life doing his thing and not worrying about women or sex?

The answer is that "which one is more a man" is a red herring. Neither is "more a man". But the guy who doesn't really try, but gets the attention, interest and sex anyway, is HIGHER VALUE, which is why he doesn't have to try.

The more you try, the lower your perceived value is to high value women. The less you try - while still interesting, attracting and getting the high value women, the higher your perceived value is to them.

Women want a man who is at least as valuable as they are, and preferably more so. You guys are all about going out and hunting them, and you go out and hunt them and try and try and try, and you peg yourself as not being at the very high levels of value by doing so. The harder he must try, the lower his value must be, she thinks. And that is instinctive for her. It may not even be something she is consciously aware of at all.

So a man who executes DMSI is always going to get swamped with interest because he is perceived as being so high value. He didn't have to do anything, and yet here these hot women are all noticing him, and noticing each other notice him, and competing for him. The only thing stopping you guys is...

1. You're stuck on the belief that "REAL men go hunt their pussy down", which makes you afraid to execute DMSI because you're worried that you can't approach while using DMSI (wrong), and not approaching makes you somehow less of a "real man", and
2. See #1.

I was just thinking that with SM the programming would rather become permanent than with DMSI and when using other subs I would be able to get some women even if I don't have the aura supporting me. That is my primary concern about it. And, I think you said it too once, it can be fun to go hunting even if you don't need to. But, anyway, if DMSI works SM becomes low priority either way. Still, when other important programs are upgraded doing a poll in regard to SM could be useful to see if people are interested in that sub at all and then decide.

I think SM changes are permanent once the subliminal has been listened to enough times. In the case of DMSI i do not believe the aura is permanent as I am sure Shannon did say that it would be unhealthy to have the aura running on all the time. So once DMSi is stopped the aura will eventually dissipate.

All of goals 1 and 2 for dmsi are also able to be permanent minus the aura.

I havent used SM, but I doubt I ever would when dmsi offers so many more benefits.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 09-08-2018

I just wanted to add to my previous post. Shannon commented that the subconsuis mind is dynamic and the old deep rooted belief may come back hence its important to carry out several runs of SM. Perhaps repeated runs of the refresher stage 7.

Despite what Shannon says my personal experiences DMSI feels like a diluted version of SM. As I said these are my PERSONAL EXPERIENCES I am not here to debate that DMSI is light years ahead of SM or SM is primitive to DMSI or Thor ran away from DMSI because he got scared of what DMSI was doing to him. The truth is I purchased several stages of SM and it seemed a waste not to use them !!!.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Nox - 09-08-2018

(09-08-2018, 01:56 AM)thor2014 Wrote: I just wanted to add to my previous post. Shannon commented that the subconsuis mind is dynamic and the old deep rooted belief may come back hence its important to carry out several runs of SM. Perhaps repeated runs of the refresher stage 7. Despite what Shannon says my personal experiences DMSI feels like a diluted version of SM. As I said these are my PERSONAL EXPERIENCES I am not hear to debate that DMSI is light years ahead of SM or SM is primitive to DMSI.

This isnt meant to be mean, and I'm happy you're happy with your progress, but I dont think you realize that you're saying basically the same things now while running sm as you were before you ever started it.

Deep rooted issues indeed. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 09-08-2018

(09-08-2018, 02:03 AM)Nox Wrote:
(09-08-2018, 01:56 AM)thor2014 Wrote: I just wanted to add to my previous post. Shannon commented that the subconsuis mind is dynamic and the old deep rooted belief may come back hence its important to carry out several runs of SM. Perhaps repeated runs of the refresher stage 7. Despite what Shannon says my personal experiences DMSI feels like a diluted version of SM. As I said these are my PERSONAL EXPERIENCES I am not hear to debate that DMSI is light years ahead of SM or SM is primitive to DMSI.

This isnt meant to be mean, and I'm happy you're happy with your progress, but I dont think you realize that you're saying basically the same things now while running sm as you were before you ever started it.

Deep rooted issues indeed. Smile

Nox I do not think your being mean you are entitled to your opinion. It just seems like Shannon can be way to objective sometimes. I am not going to be sharing any of my options anymore in this thread.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-08-2018

(09-07-2018, 09:20 AM)lano1106 Wrote:
(09-07-2018, 08:34 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 11:15 AM)lano1106 Wrote: Shannon,

To me, DMSI and SM3 achieve the same goal by taking different paths. I think that SM3 may have a strong appeal to some of us despite the old technologies because of the story/script that it is telling.

This is subjective but there is no doubt in my mind that products that you created 4-5 years ago are still awesome and passing the test of time.

More technology advances isn't always better. The original Star Wars trilogy is using 40 years old technology but they are still my favorite SW movies despite all the SFX candies that Disney can throw in the newest movies...

Sex Magnet is designed to achieve sex with women whenever you like, and whichever one you like, and DMSI is designed to achieve the same thing with the exception that it adjusts its target to whatever you find most sexually attractive gender-wise.

Sex Magnet is using a very strong focus on and into masculinity and raw sexual energy and focus to achieve it's goals. DMSI is using every possible method, technique, technology and option to achieve its goals.

Sex Magnet aims to cause you to be so sexually attractive that women will throw themselves at you, but it doesn't stop you from approaching. DMSI aims to cause you to be so sexually attractive that whoever you most want to have sex with will throw themselves at you, but it doesn't stop you from approaching.

More advanced technology is always better. That's because it is more advanced. And comparing the garbage they call Star Wars since Disney bought the franchise to DMSI and the original Star Wars movies to SM3 is an absolute non-sequitur, because logically, the newer Star Wars movies are only worse than the originals because they were highjacked by SJW ***** artists. The logic that follows for comparison to your analogy would be if I sold IML to someone who wanted to turn my products into a SJW propaganda machine, and that person had no understanding of the way I create my works or why I do them the way I do.

The only issue you guys have with DMSI is that you're afraid of it and/or what it is attempting to achieve. Mainly because it actually can achieve those goals if you don't fight it, and your fears come from achieving those goals, which is why you need DMSI in the first place. Your fears prevented you from achieving those goals!

A lot of you also seem to have fear of vagina, fear of gay people, and fear of change in general.

DMSI will not make you gay or bisexual. But if you have some fears about those subjects that are preventing you from achieving the goals of DMSI, you will start working on healing, processing and clearing them, and that can result in what some of you are calling "gay dreams".

Some of you are very afraid of women. I honestly don't blame you. But as I said before, in life, you attract and experience whatever you attune yourself to via what you believe to be true. So fearing women is based on beliefs that lead to you fearing women. Those beliefs attract women who perpetuate the fear of women, and it becomes a vicious cycle. Change those beliefs and you change the type of women you are attuned to, and what you attract into your life.

For decades, I only attracted women who would lie, cheat, steal, use me for sex and money and transport, abuse me in various ways, degrade me, character assassinate me, betray me, etc. One day I realized that this was not "their fault", it was what I was attracting again and again. So I started trying to figure out how and why, and what I realized was that my mother had raised me to always be helpless so she could always have that adorable little 4 year old boy who was scared and helpless to be there for, take care of and protect. I was looking for a mommy to take care of me, protect me and "save me". When I looked at what that was resulting in, I realized that I deserve better than to be treated the way those women were treating me, so I changed the beliefs that were resulting in those choices. Ever since then, I have had women who are much more worthwhile and trustworthy. Now I have a woman who I can trust to be honest with me, faithful to me, never do drugs or betray me, and who will be here in my life for as long as I allow her to be. Which, since that is what I have been looking for all my life, will be forever.

What changed was that I overcame my fears. That changed beliefs of what was true to reject the women I had previously been willing to accept, and attract and accept the women I actually wanted. I attuned myself differently through changing my beliefs. Your beliefs lead to your point of view, choices, actions and results in life. You can see the fruits of your beliefs by looking at what you experience in life.

And for those of you afraid of change, well change is inevitable. You change all the time, whether or not you want to or like it. So does the world around you. Change is the only constant in this universe. It is 100% inevitable and unavoidable. Fast or slow, it happens regardless of what you do to stop it.

The difference between SM and DMSI is that SM isn't strong enough to really achieve it's goals as well, as quickly or as fully as DMSI is. That fact triggers whatever part of your subconscious has put you where you are to experience fear, because in fact the goal is going to be achieved unless you do something to stop it. That fear triggers self sabotage behaviors, which result in failing to achieve the goal. That is not DMSI's fault. It's just not yet advanced enough to deal with those fears and prevent the sabotage that prevents the goals. But without that sabotage, you would be able to clearly see that SM3 is on Level 1 and DMSI is on Level 10.

I am going to be building B17 in a day or two, and then we will get our first taste of the new fear removal module.

Which, by the way, I strongly suspect I am already seeing TID from in my regular testers, as they have begun repeatedly doing things they normally do not do, in the direction Beast is trying to go.

SM isn't as powerful, and certainly isn't more powerful. It's just less scary because it's not as likely to achieve the goal, and the subconscious can more easily regulate it's level of execution.

Shannon,

thank you very very much for the detailed answer.

Ok, my SW analogy wasn't very good. I didn't meant to compare DMSI to the Disney SJW crap.

The point that I was trying to make was that some movies despite showing their age are still absolutely awesome today. but maybe the analogy doesn't hold when it comes to subliminals where more advanced is always better.

You have something correct about me. I think that I resist changes. I kept my first car 18 years and this is only 1 example among many other situations where I resist change.

BUT I also know that when I am really fed up with a situation, I am very capable of changing it.

So I guess there is hope for me ;-)

Despite all the reasons you provided for why DMSI is better than SM, I am very stubborn and I think that I'll need to see it for myself to be convinced... I am very attracted to try out SM3 because:

1. masculinity and raw sexual energy are exactly the traits that I want to focus on rather than be adaptative and flexible to any attractive target

perharps at the end of the journey, I will conclude that you were right but if I am not doing it, I will always have the dangling question: What would have happen if I did run SM3...

If you're trying to develop what AM and SM are aiming to achieve as a set, then go for it. But you have to understand what we are actually dealing with when comparing SM to DMSI.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-08-2018

(09-07-2018, 09:34 AM)lano1106 Wrote:
(09-07-2018, 08:57 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 01:12 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(09-06-2018, 11:15 AM)lano1106 Wrote: To me, DMSI and SM3 achieve the same goal by taking different paths. I think that SM3 may have a strong appeal to some of us despite the old technologies because of the story/script that it is telling.

Yeah, what I like about SM is the fact that it empowers the man to do the job instead of waiting for the woman doing it. And I think there are other people who like that, too, even if it might not be necessary if DMSI succeeds.

SM doesn't empower you to do the job any more or less than DMSI does. It also doesn't make you wait for the woman to do it any more or less than DMSI does. It's furthering AM6, which is focusing you into a more active, masculine approach. But herein lies the rub:

Most of you associate "being a man" with "hunting woman". But who is more a man? A guy who goes to the gym, gets ripped and then goes out and hits on women, gives them the power by putting her in a position to reject or accept his advances, and then gets shot down 90%+ of the time, or the guy who doesn't go to the gym, isn't ripped, and has almost every attractive women doing tricks and making the moves to try to get him to **** them, while he goes about his life doing his thing and not worrying about women or sex?

The answer is that "which one is more a man" is a red herring. Neither is "more a man". But the guy who doesn't really try, but gets the attention, interest and sex anyway, is HIGHER VALUE, which is why he doesn't have to try.

The more you try, the lower your perceived value is to high value women. The less you try - while still interesting, attracting and getting the high value women, the higher your perceived value is to them.

Women want a man who is at least as valuable as they are, and preferably more so. You guys are all about going out and hunting them, and you go out and hunt them and try and try and try, and you peg yourself as not being at the very high levels of value by doing so. The harder he must try, the lower his value must be, she thinks. And that is instinctive for her. It may not even be something she is consciously aware of at all.

So a man who executes DMSI is always going to get swamped with interest because he is perceived as being so high value. He didn't have to do anything, and yet here these hot women are all noticing him, and noticing each other notice him, and competing for him. The only thing stopping you guys is...

1. You're stuck on the belief that "REAL men go hunt their pussy down", which makes you afraid to execute DMSI because you're worried that you can't approach while using DMSI (wrong), and not approaching makes you somehow less of a "real man", and
2. See #1.


Quote:Regarding DMSI and subs in general I realized today that I somehow don't trust the subconscious to do the job correctly, that's why I feel the need to be in control and I noticed on several occasions that I try to influence the aura consciously. Or some different things on different subs.

Which obviously works, right? Because you're drowning in pussy using that method, right? And the subconscious doesn't downright dwarf the conscious mind in terms of awareness, ability, capacity and capability. Which is why we need subs to begin with.

You can't sabotage yourself and get results.

This is one a very well cool post that I have seen you post about what being a man and how it relates with success with women.

I think that I really get that 'hunting women' isn't something that a high-status man would do, or have to do and I aspire to be that.

High status men can and do hunt desirable women. But they do it in a very different way, and they don't do it as a matter of course. They approach from a point of view that lesser men don't have naturally, and it shows in their body language, actions, choices, speech patterns, timing, facial expressions, etc. These things maintain his high status in her eyes. But most of the time, a very high value man has too much female attention and interest to act on all of it, and his actions, attitude, etc. reflect that. His "hunting" is either going to be very low key and completely without neediness, or it will be "IDGAF what happens, this is fun! But I wouldn't mind fucking you, also."

Very little need for any outcome... just enough to get him to act, but not enough to get him to really need that outcome or get upset if it doesn't happen.

Quote:For me, running the AM6/SM3 programs or DMSI has never be something that I do to get women. It has always been ALL about me and becoming more masculine.

To understand why, I'm going to share some very personal shit. My parents got divorced when I was 6 years old and I have been raised by my feminist mother. My childhood was in the 80s. I had no great masculine model to copy either around me or in the medias.

I remember my childhood movies like Back To the Future. The movies are great but Michael J. Fox is the ultimate AFC when it comes to women.

I have been pretty much on my own for my whole life to define what being a man means. My feminist mother and society did throw a bunch BS at me that didn't help me at all. One consequence of that education and how it made me become is that I have never been as popular as I wished to be with women

I feel that I have done great so far but I still feel that I could be even 'more' alpha. This is the weak point that I am looking to address with AM6/SM3 and it is much more than just getting pussies... It is to become a better man and I feel, that I will better served with AM6/SM3 than with just DMSI...

AM was created by a man who had a very similar experience to yours, for himself to balance him out and take the place of a father figure's guidance in how to be balanced between masculine and feminine in favor of masculine. Single mothers, in spite of their best efforts and intentions, they can't teach a male child the masculine side of the coin because they're not male. Just like a male parent raising a daughter alone is not going to be able to show her the feminine side of life and being a woman that a woman could.

So if your aim is more masculinity, then AM is definitely the way to go. SM just turns the results of AM sexual. By itself, it is incomplete, which is why it requires AM or the AM refresher (if you've already run AM) first.

DMSI doesn't directly focus on you expressing your gender more obviously or aggressively, but it does have programming in it that will result in that if that is what the person of interest needs from you to be irresistibly sexually attracted.