(08-21-2018, 11:38 AM)sushi521 Wrote: Hey Shannon, how is the testing on the mystery sub going?

(08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.

A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.

Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?

Thanks

It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.

How many loops were you using when this happened?

(08-21-2018, 11:55 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:

(08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.

A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.

Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?

Thanks

It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.

How many loops were you using when this happened?

I seemed to see more results at the beginning with many versions. Especially I remember V1.0, 2.2, 3.1 and 3.2. Don't remember other versions that well. I still have the theory that with the time the subs put too much pressure on me and I start to low perform - like with different other things in real life when too much pressure was there. But I seem to need a bit of of pressure to perform well.

(08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.

A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.

Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?

Thanks

It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.

How many loops were you using when this happened?

(08-21-2018, 12:00 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Hey Shannon, does DMSI do anything regarding expanding specific chakras / energy centers of the body that concerns attracting sex? Specifically the heart region? Thanks.

(08-21-2018, 12:08 PM)Leo1990 Wrote:

(08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.

A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.

Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?

Thanks

It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.

How many loops were you using when this happened?

Two loops both times. The execution would start maybe 10-20m into listening and then after the second loop, be 90% gone.

I forgot to mention that the first time, I was not listening to the sub, but just right after finishing the two runs. The second time, I was actively listening to side A.

I hope this helps.

So in summary, the first execution diminished more slowly over time, but also took more time to get it going. The second time was much faster onset with faster dissipation.

(08-21-2018, 01:02 PM)mat422 Wrote: So I was wondering when dmsi 3.3 comes out, is it going to be side B only again in the beginning? After recently moving back to A I've realized those self esteem modules are really important for me and without them it's even harder to execute the goals of dmsi.

(08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.

A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.

Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?

Thanks

It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.

How many loops were you using when this happened?

(08-21-2018, 08:21 AM)NoLimit Wrote:

(08-21-2018, 04:06 AM)kingpill Wrote: You gotta 'risk creepy'. Girls like having sex with 'badboys' or 'f**kboys' with not 'cool respectable guys'. Those are the ones they will settle down with after having all their fun.

Basically you gotta be abit of a ***** to them in a funny/cocky way and tease them a little bit while being sexually confident.

Without an element of danger, seduction isn't seduction.

You can risk creepy and be a badboy when you have look, I'm living proof of that. But if you are old and balding she will just call the cops dude


I think Jake and Thor are spot on on this one, for exemple when I was young I had acne and no girls would sleep with me.
Then It cleared when I grew up and same girls I was asking some years ago were up for sex when we met again.

Later I got muscular, grew a beard and got some good tattoos on my body and now I'm getting a lot more women, it's simple as that.

My attitude toward girls did not really change during this time, I just improoved my look. If only I now know better how to manage relationships (my harem).

Give us some physical change sub demand is high, I'm tired of this DMSI gentleness.

(08-21-2018, 01:14 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-21-2018, 01:02 PM)mat422 Wrote: So I was wondering when dmsi 3.3 comes out, is it going to be side B only again in the beginning? After recently moving back to A I've realized those self esteem modules are really important for me and without them it's even harder to execute the goals of dmsi.

It is very useful for me to understand what needs to be done still by only releasing B side for the first month. So it's probable that that is how all future releases will be rolled out. But don't convince yourself that X or Y is going to happen if you only use B, because you don't know what parts of the script are active in each, and you don't know what goodies and surprises I may have included in the latest version.

Ultimately, I want to have B so good that nobody needs A anymore -- if that is possible.

Besides, the self esteem modules are active in both A and B of 3.2.