(08-04-2018, 06:06 PM)Zane Wrote:

(08-04-2018, 05:46 PM)Benjamin Wrote:

Quote:I am wondering what kinda brain damage she's suffering from?

Also, I think the care taker is taking things to extreme.. No Kissing..? WTF?

That really does sound pretty crazy. From your description she doesn't sound like she's challenged or anything.

My first thought is that there's something strange up with the carer. Who knows.

EDIT: Ok, I just read your post above this which I hadn't before I wrote the reply. I can see where they are coming from now that you described how she is.

Well the 9nly this I would say that if u want to spend time with her like walking around and watching movies then it's OK.. I think this woman just wants to stay in close to you and spend time with you..

(08-01-2018, 09:49 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-01-2018, 08:28 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:

(08-01-2018, 06:54 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-01-2018, 06:49 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:

(08-01-2018, 05:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: TID causing an aura so powerful that it keeps you awake? That's... interesting... since we are at least a month away from 3.3 still. But I will put that in my notes.

If they are maturing when affected, are you saying it needs to stay in, or it needs enhancement?

Yes, it's strange, because I don't even wanted to run it at begin. But I don't know what else can cause it.

Regarding masturbating, they should be more willing to have sex with the user, maybe every time they masturbating realize more and more that only sex with the user can bring the relief she needs from sex.

Wouldn't that be taking away her free will? And remember, this program may be primarily in use by men to attract women right now, but what happens when it works and the news media picks it up? It's going to be in use by a lot of women, too.

Part of the reason I designed it for all genders is so that no one gender would go too far with it. What you can do to them, they can also do to you. Remember that.

Hm, I don't know if it is already taking away her free will, but maybe you can can make a variation. Like making her think how much better it would be now having sex with the user. Maybe you have a better idea. But if you think it goes too far then I understand if you just leave the part as it is.

I will also write something about the aura I noticed when I am home again from my business training.

I've got a lot of work to do on 3.3, and a lot more than I can remember. But I'm working on it.

(08-05-2018, 02:30 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: - In regard to these modules like nofap, anti-paysex you said that they will only run as long the script is running in your head. But what if the script becomes somewhat permanent, wouldn't it mean that these modules would also stay forever in your head? I am simply asking because I am almost scared to death, that these modules could stay forever in your head, the thought really creates an insane fear.

(08-04-2018, 06:53 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: @Shannon

Hey buddy, so my brother lives with us at home here in the UK. Hes today confided in me of just how badly hes lost motivation and cant seem to turn it on for his work and career which is stalling.

I wanted to know if its okay to allow him to use the UM/OP sub (downloaded to his phone) that I bought even though I want to start it for myself too in 35days time and continue when I get back to Europe?

thanks alot man!

(08-05-2018, 05:16 AM)RTBoss Wrote:

(08-04-2018, 06:53 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: @Shannon

Hey buddy, so my brother lives with us at home here in the UK. Hes today confided in me of just how badly hes lost motivation and cant seem to turn it on for his work and career which is stalling.

I wanted to know if its okay to allow him to use the UM/OP sub (downloaded to his phone) that I bought even though I want to start it for myself too in 35days time and continue when I get back to Europe?

thanks alot man!

No, your brother will need to purchase his own copy.

No one can be in possession of a copy, but the owner. If you purchased a copy for yourself, you must be the sole possessor.

If you are actively listening to UM/OP on a speaker for yourself, and your brother is exposed, that's perfectly fine. Putting a copy on your brother's phone is not.

Quote:The copy protection is designed to trigger if the program is benefitted from in a situation where fair value is not being returned for fair value. If you’re benefitting from the program, the only time it will not trigger the copy protection is if:
2. You transferred a copy you paid for without keeping any copies for yourself or anyone else.

Quote:If you buy it, and you give it to somebody, you must give the person all copies of it and stop using it.

Quote:If you buy a copy of a program, and someone else is consistently using it while you are not being exposed, that is not fair use. A person other than the owner is getting value from the program, and that would trigger the copy protection.

(08-05-2018, 05:04 AM)RTBoss Wrote:

(08-05-2018, 02:30 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: - In regard to these modules like nofap, anti-paysex you said that they will only run as long the script is running in your head. But what if the script becomes somewhat permanent, wouldn't it mean that these modules would also stay forever in your head? I am simply asking because I am almost scared to death, that these modules could stay forever in your head, the thought really creates an insane fear.

The loopholes Shannon is closing are closed for the express purpose of preventing you from using those loopholes as reasons to not execute, or escape. Your free will remains intact. You aren't being "forced" to not masturbate or pay for the company of a prostitute. If you are using masturbation or prostitutes to get out of executing DMSI, it's THAT which Shannon is closing off.

If you're happily executing DMSI, and you choose to burp your worm for reasons other than escaping DMSI - no problem.

Put your fears to rest, my friend - Shannon's not removing your free will to choose.

(08-05-2018, 06:50 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:

(08-05-2018, 05:04 AM)RTBoss Wrote:

(08-05-2018, 02:30 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: - In regard to these modules like nofap, anti-paysex you said that they will only run as long the script is running in your head. But what if the script becomes somewhat permanent, wouldn't it mean that these modules would also stay forever in your head? I am simply asking because I am almost scared to death, that these modules could stay forever in your head, the thought really creates an insane fear.

The loopholes Shannon is closing are closed for the express purpose of preventing you from using those loopholes as reasons to not execute, or escape. Your free will remains intact. You aren't being "forced" to not masturbate or pay for the company of a prostitute. If you are using masturbation or prostitutes to get out of executing DMSI, it's THAT which Shannon is closing off.

If you're happily executing DMSI, and you choose to burp your worm for reasons other than escaping DMSI - no problem.

Put your fears to rest, my friend - Shannon's not removing your free will to choose.

I know what you are trying to say, and I would love to put my fear aside - and in this case I would probably already execute DMSI too - but the amount of fears created by the thought that I could never again masturbate, watch porn or pay for sex if I choose to is really, really insane. I somehow feel like it's more fear than to the end goal of DMSI. So I really need something that ensures that and that makes me be able to believe this. But I also have the impression that Shannon comes up with a more clever idea to close the loopholes than what's already in.

(08-05-2018, 07:18 AM)CatMan Wrote: No offence but you've constantly mentioned this masturbation thing like it's life or death, and championed not putting it into the script, misunderstanding why it was put in over and over and over and over.

Man, he's said time and again, it's only for people who use it to RESIST THE SCRIPT, ie. to not have sex. I can't count how many times it's been said to you .

It's okay. Completely okay. It's scripted to be a win-win. Don't worry.

(08-05-2018, 07:27 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:

(08-05-2018, 07:18 AM)CatMan Wrote: No offence but you've constantly mentioned this masturbation thing like it's life or death, and championed not putting it into the script, misunderstanding why it was put in over and over and over and over.

Man, he's said time and again, it's only for people who use it to RESIST THE SCRIPT, ie. to not have sex. I can't count how many times it's been said to you .

It's okay. Completely okay. It's scripted to be a win-win. Don't worry.

Believe me, for me it's at least in the same way frustrating like for you guys reading my statements about these modules, but I can't help that, it's an almost panick like feeling when I think about it.

(08-04-2018, 05:17 PM)MasterEnki Wrote: @Zane

Quote:I am wondering what kinda brain damage she’s suffering from?

37yo woman has some difficulty speaking, she can only say shorter sentences, that are other missing words. But she usually always says key words. For example about a week ago when I was seeing her at the local cafe (her carer is okay with cafe lunches with her), she said “Bed... Together” while pointing at me. Another time she was saying “My house... Me... You... Sleep”.

Recently, at one of our cafe lunches, she was saying “You... My house”, and I asked her what do you want to do together, and she replied “Upstairs... Cuddle” (her room is upstairs). It seems like she wants to sleep with me (she is fairly consistent with her message).

37yo woman also has below-average IQ, and is noticeably slower in her movements and often takes several seconds to answer simple questions (her answers are consistent though). She tends to ask me the same questions over and over, so her memory may not be too great. She’s asked me if I live with my parents several times now (I live by myself at the moment).

Quote:Also, I think the care taker is taking things to extreme.. No kissing..? WTF?

Agreed. It is quite extreme.

State legislation says that one of the many exceptions to consent includes ‘Mentally impairment’, meaning that if a person who is ‘mentally impaired’ consents to sex, then it is automatically rape.

Her carer said to me “she has trouble saying ‘no’” and that this point voids her consent. I think her carer is over-reacting, but the group home policies consider kissing as a romantic / sexual act, and according to the group home policies, romantic relationships and sexual relationships are treated the same (referred to as ‘personal relationship’). The group home errs on the side of over-protected, rather than under-protected.

Very recently, my state has new legislative requirements for group homes focused on preventing sexual harassment, abuse, assault and/or rape. State consent laws were made ‘tougher’ a few months ago.

“Only an enthusiastic ‘Yes’, means ‘Yes’.” is the current legislation. But all grey areas are treated as an automatic ‘no’ / non-consent (such as brain damage, intellectual disability, drunk, high, coercion, blackmail, and many others).

MeToo has lead to hysteria, paranoia and mass fear. At the local shops there are government sponsored billboards that show women crying, with short messages about sexual abuse / violence. One of the government sponsored ads said “9 in 10 women have been sexually harassed, but only 1 in 4 adults report it”.

All this is likely why the carer is so over-the-top / over-protective. It frustrates me greatly.