Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 12:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-17-2018, 12:32 AM)Raz Wrote:
(07-16-2018, 03:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: Upon commencement of the work on US/LM, it becomes abundantly clear that I am going to have to re-think making this program as a focusfire, as it almost certainly cannot be made in 3 statements or less. To do this correctly may be in the 20 to 40 statements region, unless I can find some way to condense all that into one to three statements, which honestly seems unlikely. I am going to have to think on this.

Does this mean you are thinking about not building US/LM at the moment because it would take too much time?

Yes, I have concluded that it will take more time than I had allotted.

Quote:If so, would you consider building pure US in this round of focusfire creation?

That is still a possibility and still on the table. I'm considering that.

Hey Shannon,
Since you aren’t making US/LM, when do you think you will be making it? Also could LM be a candidate for a focusfire sub too?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Darkness - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 11:50 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-16-2018, 02:46 PM)Darkness Wrote:
(07-15-2018, 07:43 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-15-2018, 09:12 AM)Darkness Wrote: Shannon could you extensively optimize and refine the cognitive decoherence module. To help the user think super clearly and not be befuddled or have mental lag and be free of the inability to flow in conversation . Because I haven’t used any subs for two months now, and my brain is officially functioning at 100%. Even trivial socializing has improved. I’m not struggling to think, nor is my speech garbled and nonsensical.

What was the last sub you used?

DMSI was. It unfortunately tends with 5G tech onward.

Can you tell me what usage patterns and programs you experienced this with in 5G?

Usage was as prescribed.


AM6
Universal Detox
SM3


Eprha( if more than 1 loop a day was used)
All DMSI iterations


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - sushi521 - 07-17-2018

Shannon, since you're building Sleep Aid, can you make a lucid dream focus-fire sub as well? I think it will be an interesting one and we can easily see if it works.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - jonathan4all - 07-17-2018

Howabout a focus fire sub on ultramotivation and overcoming procrastination together since those two were long due. Nothing beats a strong workethic afterall.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 05:04 AM)swisston Wrote:
(07-16-2018, 07:17 AM)Shannon Wrote: The sexual performance module is a rock vs. a hard place for me. If I am too agressive (3.1), people either get insane results or they reverse resist and shut down completely. If I try to do what will work for everyone (3.2) those of you who are not getting enough sexual frequency will complain because it isn't working fast enough.
Is it worth having stages then? One for getting rid of the base level resistance (such as mine), then a more advanced stage once the first one is being implemented properly?

The sexual mastery seems a bit redundant for me, since I'm not even implementing the basics.

That doesn't make sense. If it was redundant for you, you would be accessing it or something that does the same thing from another source. I don't follow what you mean.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 06:37 AM)Tigerismyspirit Wrote:
(07-17-2018, 05:04 AM)swisston Wrote:
(07-16-2018, 07:17 AM)Shannon Wrote: The sexual performance module is a rock vs. a hard place for me. If I am too agressive (3.1), people either get insane results or they reverse resist and shut down completely. If I try to do what will work for everyone (3.2) those of you who are not getting enough sexual frequency will complain because it isn't working fast enough.
Is it worth having stages then? One for getting rid of the base level resistance (such as mine), then a more advanced stage once the first one is being implemented properly?

The sexual mastery seems a bit redundant for me, since I'm not even implementing the basics.

I also had this question. Is it possible for DMSI to be a multistage program like AM that can start from the basic and slowly heal/clear, gradually make one sexually irresistible followed by making the affected approach, seduce, and have sex with him as opposed to going with waves of healing/clearing (A) and brute force (B)?

It is possible, but I am not going to make that. It isn't going to improve things to do it that way, just make it take months to build each version and make the price skyrocket. If it was going to make a difference, I would have already implemented that.

Quote:Sexual mastery seems to be totally redundant for those people that haven't had sex on DMSI yet including me.

Once again, the word you mean is not redundant. In the usage you are using, you mean something like irrelevant.

However, it is not. You will give a significantly better sexual performance each time with these effects, as long as you are executing it. I can't turn you into a sex god without having some experience, this isn't magical hocus pocus. So when you first start, you will be a virgin losing his virginity and then each time you will do better and better, above and beyond what you would have otherwise, as long as you are executing the script.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 10:13 AM)kornjacinvrac Wrote: Shannon i have been using 6 loops on masked with earbuds and something is happening, im on the second day i feel my emotions are getting stronger, courage is present and DMSI is pushing something, i mean... its doing its work. Also, inside me i feel a "i don't give a f" attitude which maybe is resistance or maybe i dont give a f anyways, or something i don't know. My question is, i hear my ears buzzing sometimes, for how long can i listen to 6 loops max? For one month, two three? What is the optimal time lenght you recommend?

By "buzzing" are you referring to tinnitus? Tinnitus is only possible if you are using the ultrasonic or hybrid track too loudly, or you are playing the masked tracks WAY the hell too loudly (heavy metal concert loudly) on speakers. If this is the case, all you need to do is adjust the volume downwards or switch to masked. I suggest that if you have ringing in your ears, it is most likely the ultrasonic being too loud, so just adjust it downwards a bit per day until that stops.

You can listen to it forever, as long as you're using it at a safe volume. I suggest you use it for (X-35) more days, where X is the date of release for DMSI 3.3.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 11:07 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, since it seems like most users feel something on 7 loops of 3.2 compared to 1 loop, will one loop of 3.3 at least be as effective as 7 loops of 3.2?

I know it's a ways off, but I'm still curious.

I suspect that given how much resistance you guys are dealing with, it probably will not be. I don't know for sure; we have to build it first and then see. This next time, I may specifically model the optimal number of loops for the forum, or just not model loops at all and let you guys figure it out on your own. I expect the necessary number of loops for the forum users to go down from ~7, but I don't know how much lower it will go.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 11:30 AM)Tigerismyspirit Wrote: Chaosvrgn, RTBoss, Dzemoo - are they running DMSI 3.2? Does anybody know? I would be curious to know their stories if they are, indeed, running it.

I know that at least one of them (RTBoss) is running DMSI 3.2. His efforts are producing results, but not the results he wants. His case, though, is a very special one. He's married, and his situation is very complex. I know he will eventually achieve design goal, but I don't know exactly how.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - mat422 - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 02:42 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-17-2018, 11:07 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, since it seems like most users feel something on 7 loops of 3.2 compared to 1 loop, will one loop of 3.3 at least be as effective as 7 loops of 3.2?

I know it's a ways off, but I'm still curious.

I suspect that given how much resistance you guys are dealing with, it probably will not be. I don't know for sure; we have to build it first and then see. This next time, I may specifically model the optimal number of loops for the forum, or just not model loops at all and let you guys figure it out on your own. I expect the necessary number of loops for the forum users to go down from ~7, but I don't know how much lower it will go.

I remember some time back you said you were working on a way to get the user to self-calibrate the correct amount of loops. Is that still a possibility?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 02:25 PM)jonathan4all Wrote: Howabout a focus fire sub on ultramotivation and overcoming procrastination together since those two were long due. Nothing beats a strong workethic afterall.

I like this idea of this program in addition to US/LM.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Tigerismyspirit - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 02:35 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-17-2018, 06:37 AM)Tigerismyspirit Wrote:
(07-17-2018, 05:04 AM)swisston Wrote:
(07-16-2018, 07:17 AM)Shannon Wrote: The sexual performance module is a rock vs. a hard place for me. If I am too agressive (3.1), people either get insane results or they reverse resist and shut down completely. If I try to do what will work for everyone (3.2) those of you who are not getting enough sexual frequency will complain because it isn't working fast enough.
Is it worth having stages then? One for getting rid of the base level resistance (such as mine), then a more advanced stage once the first one is being implemented properly?

The sexual mastery seems a bit redundant for me, since I'm not even implementing the basics.

I also had this question. Is it possible for DMSI to be a multistage program like AM that can start from the basic and slowly heal/clear, gradually make one sexually irresistible followed by making the affected approach, seduce, and have sex with him as opposed to going with waves of healing/clearing (A) and brute force (B)?

It is possible, but I am not going to make that. It isn't going to improve things to do it that way, just make it take months to build each version and make the price skyrocket. If it was going to make a difference, I would have already implemented that.

Quote:Sexual mastery seems to be totally redundant for those people that haven't had sex on DMSI yet including me.

Once again, the word you mean is not redundant. In the usage you are using, you mean something like irrelevant.

However, it is not. You will give a significantly better sexual performance each time with these effects, as long as you are executing it. I can't turn you into a sex god without having some experience, this isn't magical hocus pocus. So when you first start, you will be a virgin losing his virginity and then each time you will do better and better, above and beyond what you would have otherwise, as long as you are executing the script .

Problem is I don't know when I'll be executing. Fear and resistance together seems to be gigantic enough to be destroyed soon.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dweller94 - 07-17-2018

This badboy LM/US combo, I’ve had dreams about me running this years ago and that it’ll be a major success for all, just putting this out there.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - JackOfHearts - 07-17-2018

(07-17-2018, 02:40 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-17-2018, 10:13 AM)kornjacinvrac Wrote: Shannon i have been using 6 loops on masked with earbuds and something is happening, im on the second day i feel my emotions are getting stronger, courage is present and DMSI is pushing something, i mean... its doing its work. Also, inside me i feel a "i don't give a f" attitude which maybe is resistance or maybe i dont give a f anyways, or something i don't know. My question is, i hear my ears buzzing sometimes, for how long can i listen to 6 loops max? For one month, two three? What is the optimal time lenght you recommend?

By "buzzing" are you referring to tinnitus? Tinnitus is only possible if you are using the ultrasonic or hybrid track too loudly, or you are playing the masked tracks WAY the hell too loudly (heavy metal concert loudly) on speakers. If this is the case, all you need to do is adjust the volume downwards or switch to masked. I suggest that if you have ringing in your ears, it is most likely the ultrasonic being too loud, so just adjust it downwards a bit per day until that stops.

You can listen to it forever, as long as you're using it at a safe volume. I suggest you use it for (X-35) more days, where X is the date of release for DMSI 3.3.
I wasn't in either of this cases and I still got tinnitus from subliminals, so I doubt that it's the only possible way to get tinnitus.