Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 03-18-2018

(03-18-2018, 10:53 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Shannon put no masturbation in DMSI for a reason. It's funny to me how many guys are complaining about it, so they masturbate anyway, then when you look at their journals, they complain about barely getting any looks from women out in public or results in general. Yet they still argue that masturbating doesn't effect or take away from their power to attract women. So much resistance going on. Come on, guys. There is a reason Shannon put it in there. Trust what he is doing.

It's funny how you link masturbation to getting no looks because there could be a million other reasons for that happening, including simply resistance.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - wolverine_i_am - 03-18-2018

(03-18-2018, 10:59 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 10:53 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Shannon put no masturbation in DMSI for a reason. It's funny to me how many guys are complaining about it, so they masturbate anyway, then when you look at their journals, they complain about barely getting any looks from women out in public or results in general. Yet they still argue that masturbating doesn't effect or take away from their power to attract women. So much resistance going on. Come on, guys. There is a reason Shannon put it in there. Trust what he is doing.

It's funny how you link masturbation to getting no looks because there could be a million other reasons for that happening, including simply resistance.

What I'm saying is for those guys who aren't getting any women attraction at all, yet they are still masturbating, perhaps they should rethink their habits and try do no fap. Then see how things change.

Rather than blaming the no masturbation module and saying it's the reason for causing their resistance.

In reality, their masturbating habits is the very reason why they aren't getting attraction, because it's killing your energy source, and the sniper has no power left to snipe women.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Daredevil - 03-18-2018

Masturbation is Resistance ^^^^^^^^^^^


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 03-18-2018

(03-18-2018, 11:08 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 10:59 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 10:53 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Shannon put no masturbation in DMSI for a reason. It's funny to me how many guys are complaining about it, so they masturbate anyway, then when you look at their journals, they complain about barely getting any looks from women out in public or results in general. Yet they still argue that masturbating doesn't effect or take away from their power to attract women. So much resistance going on. Come on, guys. There is a reason Shannon put it in there. Trust what he is doing.

It's funny how you link masturbation to getting no looks because there could be a million other reasons for that happening, including simply resistance.

What I'm saying is for those guys who aren't getting any women attraction at all, yet they are still masturbating, perhaps they should rethink their habits and try do no fap. Then see how things change.

Rather than blaming the no masturbation module and saying it's the reason for causing their resistance.

In reality, their masturbating habits is the very reason why they aren't getting attraction, because it's killing your energy source, and the sniper has no power left to snipe women.

I was getting initial attraction in most previous versions even if I masturbated about once a week. So your theory doesn't apply here very well. Not talking here about excessive masturbation.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - wolverine_i_am - 03-18-2018

(03-18-2018, 11:44 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 11:08 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 10:59 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 10:53 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Shannon put no masturbation in DMSI for a reason. It's funny to me how many guys are complaining about it, so they masturbate anyway, then when you look at their journals, they complain about barely getting any looks from women out in public or results in general. Yet they still argue that masturbating doesn't effect or take away from their power to attract women. So much resistance going on. Come on, guys. There is a reason Shannon put it in there. Trust what he is doing.

It's funny how you link masturbation to getting no looks because there could be a million other reasons for that happening, including simply resistance.

What I'm saying is for those guys who aren't getting any women attraction at all, yet they are still masturbating, perhaps they should rethink their habits and try do no fap. Then see how things change.

Rather than blaming the no masturbation module and saying it's the reason for causing their resistance.

In reality, their masturbating habits is the very reason why they aren't getting attraction, because it's killing your energy source, and the sniper has no power left to snipe women.

I was getting initial attraction in most previous versions even if I masturbated about once a week. So your theory doesn't apply here very well. Not talking here about excessive masturbation.

Yeah that's cause once a week isn't killing off your power supply too much. So you can still hit girls witth your aura.

Other guys on here are doing it daily or multiple times daily. Then complain about no women attraction.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kenshin - 03-19-2018

Quote:Yesterday I started using the new cough program, designed to get me to stop coughing. So far why I am coughing seems to be a mystery to all. Doctors just chalk it up to "the effects of chemotherapy", and the models always indicated that every specific reason I could think of to target was incorrect. The first version was working about as well as an OTC cough suppressant, which is to say, after a few months, not at all.

This version is definitely doing something interesting. I'm not instantly done coughing, but I notice that I have a lot of heat within me while I am running it, enough that I am sitting here sweating, and my cough is reduced and changed. Most of the time, I would cough unproductively. Now, my cough is much more productive and infrequent than before.

Not instant success, but definitely promising.

Cold-pressed, ripe pineapple juice should help you with cough and chest congestion.
Middle, 'woody' part has to be juiced as it has substance called bromelain.

"Pineapple juice contains a mixture of enzymes called bromelain, which has strong anti-inflammatory properties. It’s thought that bromelain can help with respiratory problems that are tied to allergies and asthma. It’s also thought to have mucolytic properties that help break up and expel mucus."

Drinks


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 03-19-2018

(03-18-2018, 05:54 AM)lano1106 Wrote:
(03-17-2018, 11:52 PM)Ymiraku Wrote:
Shannon Wrote:As long as your beliefs conflict with the goals of DMSI, you will resist it. As long as you believe that you have to chase to get tail, you will be stuck believing you are displaying lower value while you are in fact classing yourself, at best, as being "Level 2" instead of Level 1. Just because a lot of guys can't naturally get attention without action is not to say that the top 1% of the top 1% can't. What you're trying to do is be that level 2 or whatever guy, who is successful within his level. What DMSI is trying to do is turn you into that Level 1 guy you refuse to believe exists.

Brad Pitt walks into a bar. How many women does he have to game to go out to his car and get his dick wet?

Nicholas Cage. Elvis Presley. Michael Jordan. John F. Kennedy. Justin Beiber. George Clooney. Will Smith. Johnny Depp. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. Tom Cruise. Robert Downey Jr. Ashton Kutcher. Channing Tatum. Frank Sinatra. Tiger Woods. Leonardo DiCaprio. Eminem. John Wayne. All of these guys, and many more, could answer with...

Zero.

It helps that everyone you listed there is a celebrity and are mostly household names and command extremely high social status. What about a guy who isn't popular and well known outside of his own friends and acquaintances? Sure he may be extremely attractive and have high personal value and will get a lot of looks from women but he is and unknown variable to most people. It doesn't matter how strong your sexual energy is, the society conditioned thinking that 99% of the female are ruled by will prevent them from making first contact with you, maybe unless they are extremely confident themselves and are willing to risk breaking the conditioned rules that they have programmed with. But that is an exceptional situation.

The way that I understand it is even if a celebrity isn't recognized, he will be treated as such simply by the non-verbal cues that you will communicate simply because of your self-image.

If you deeply believe that you are the shit and you are expecting to be treated as such. People will accept that and comply.

That is correct.

F. in. I quite often have the chance to observe successful opera singers up close and personal. Now, there are relatively few opera singers who would be instantly recognizable to the general public (as, let's be honest, compared to say, movies or TV, the whole opera thing is kinda niche nowadays), and most of these are long dead by now ( Sad ), but - the way these guys (and gals) carry themselves, and interact with their surroundings, often does have an extremely powerful effect on people.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Nox - 03-19-2018

(03-18-2018, 11:49 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 11:44 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 11:08 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 10:59 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(03-18-2018, 10:53 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Shannon put no masturbation in DMSI for a reason. It's funny to me how many guys are complaining about it, so they masturbate anyway, then when you look at their journals, they complain about barely getting any looks from women out in public or results in general. Yet they still argue that masturbating doesn't effect or take away from their power to attract women. So much resistance going on. Come on, guys. There is a reason Shannon put it in there. Trust what he is doing.

It's funny how you link masturbation to getting no looks because there could be a million other reasons for that happening, including simply resistance.

What I'm saying is for those guys who aren't getting any women attraction at all, yet they are still masturbating, perhaps they should rethink their habits and try do no fap. Then see how things change.

Rather than blaming the no masturbation module and saying it's the reason for causing their resistance.

In reality, their masturbating habits is the very reason why they aren't getting attraction, because it's killing your energy source, and the sniper has no power left to snipe women.

I was getting initial attraction in most previous versions even if I masturbated about once a week. So your theory doesn't apply here very well. Not talking here about excessive masturbation.

Yeah that's cause once a week isn't killing off your power supply too much. So you can still hit girls witth your aura.

Other guys on here are doing it daily or multiple times daily. Then complain about no women attraction.

The thing is, that unless your power supply is properly maintained to keep itself performing at high efficiency long duration semen retention actually makes your energetic system weaker.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Daredevil - 03-19-2018

You Have to Move the Energy Around, but DMSI does that already. The old way was to do Tai Chi or Chi Kung.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Nox - 03-19-2018

(03-19-2018, 06:41 AM)Daredevil Wrote: You Have to Move the Energy Around, but DMSI does that already. The old way was to do Tai Chi or Chi Kung.

Need to move as well as build. Just moving energy doesn't keep the building process maximized.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 03-19-2018

(03-19-2018, 06:41 AM)Daredevil Wrote: You Have to Move the Energy Around, but DMSI does that already. The old way was to do Tai Chi or Chi Kung.

How do you know that DMSI does that?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Daredevil - 03-19-2018

By Using the DMSI Aura, Sniping or any of its Functions. All of DMSI is moving energy around.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AstonMartin - 03-19-2018

“We had two version of DMSI 3.2 - A and B, seventy-five pellets of Multi-stage programs like AM6.0, five sheets of Universal Detox, a salt shaker half full of Self-Esteem, and a whole galaxy of multi-colored Anxiety Relief Aid, OED, E2, ASC... and also a quart of BASE, a quart of SM3, a case of WM2, a pint of raw AYSSL and two dozen of other subs.
Not that we needed all that for the trip, but once you get locked into a serious sub collection, the tendency is to push it as far as you can.”

"Fear and loathing in Subliminal-talks.com" Smile))))))))))))))


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - maxx55 - 03-19-2018

Not gonna lie, that Disconnect From All Negative Stress sub sounds good right now, but I'm gonna stick it out with DMSI.

Also, what's the experimental sub going to be for?