![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-8) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Ampersnd - 11-22-2024 (11-21-2024, 08:58 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-21-2024, 07:44 PM)Ampersnd Wrote: I use it as described in the sales page. 40 minutes for 7 consecutive days, then off for 6. Most likely yes. Basically I should keep sticking it out? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 05:54 AM)DMSIuser78 Wrote:(11-21-2024, 07:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: GPR P18-Elwood was set to "Draft" because it sold 0 copies after more than a year. How on earth does my end show 0 copies sold then? Huh... GPR P20 is 2 years more R&D on the skeleton script and on the key script. It works better and faster and doesn't require high volumes anymore. It also works for more issues. It's a 5.11G, which would be the standard $450 or $64.95/month. I'll enable GPR-P18 for you to read the description. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 08:26 AM)samba99 Wrote:(11-21-2024, 07:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: DMSI will next be out after 6G is released. I cannot build it in 5.11G. RE #1: It has a sex drive enhancer in it already. Same script, IIRC. Orgasm enhancer for the woman, but can't necessarily include it for the man, because we're trying to prevent performance issues like PE. These will be improved significantly just by using newer skeleton script technology. #2: I have plans to look into making DMSI couples friendly. Should be doable, and it's been in the list for a long time. #3: You cannot divide your focus or attention without dividing your focus or attention. We can't do this one without dividing attention and focus. I suspect it would upset a lot of guys if I did this, especially before we have finished making it work for the majority. This one is not feasible: those goals aren't what DMSI is about. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 08:45 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote:(11-22-2024, 08:26 AM)samba99 Wrote: Yeah 6g would be nice. These are some of the features I would love to see and the reasoning behind it DMSI aimed at couples would be aimed at limiting the effects of the program as much as possible to your SO. That should be a natural automatic result. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 09:52 AM)Ampersnd Wrote:(11-21-2024, 08:58 PM)Shannon Wrote: Do you think your response represents any sort of a resistance response? I suggest that you begin decreasing the days off my one per cycle and see if you can break through that. Don't go below 2 days off per cycle. And stop decreasing them if you break through that resistance. If you get through a cycle with just 2 days off and still don't see a change, let me know and we'll take it from there. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - NOMAD - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 06:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: #3: You cannot divide your focus or attention without dividing your focus or attention. We can't do this one without dividing attention and focus. I suspect it would upset a lot of guys if I did this, especially before we have finished making it work for the majority. This one is not feasible: those goals aren't what DMSI is about. I agree 100% with everything stated here, particularly the old text. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - EvolvingPhoenix - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 06:20 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-22-2024, 08:45 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: I agree. If I get a committed partner, I wanna still be able to use DMSI, but with more focus on that one partner rather than feeling tempted to cheat. And Using the sexual energy for self improvement (and maybe creativity, since that's what sexual energy seems particularly oriented towards) can definitely help with the not masturbating thing and with avoiding wet dreams as a result of not masturbating. And improving sexual performance once IN bed would be great! I agree with all of these requested features! So... for a DMSI aimed at your SO, just use DMSI? Sweet \m/ RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - samba99 - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 06:17 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-22-2024, 08:26 AM)samba99 Wrote: Yeah 6g would be nice. These are some of the features I would love to see and the reasoning behind it Fair, however we are communicating with the subconscious mind, does the concept of dividing attention still applies here? I thought the sub mind is unlimited and does not work in a similar way as the conscious mind. My argument is that what is someone out there believes that to be sexually attractive is to be a drunk alcoholic badass, and therefor, they become one as a result, and they start attracting sexual partners as a result,. This would ofcourse means they achieving the goals of the program, but at a cost that other side of their life is taking a hit (negative results of being alcoholic for example) Above is only illustration example. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 07:06 PM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote:(11-22-2024, 06:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: DMSI aimed at couples would be aimed at limiting the effects of the program as much as possible to your SO. That should be a natural automatic result. Not what I was trying to communicate. Allow me to be more specific. If you use DMSI for couples, focusing on your SO should be a natural and automatic result. Using the original will not be healthy for most relationships. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 08:00 PM)samba99 Wrote:(11-22-2024, 06:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: #3: You cannot divide your focus or attention without dividing your focus or attention. We can't do this one without dividing attention and focus. I suspect it would upset a lot of guys if I did this, especially before we have finished making it work for the majority. This one is not feasible: those goals aren't what DMSI is about. Dividing the attention of the subconscious mind would seem to be a rather preposterous notion, wouldn't it? After all, it is handing well over a million different functions all the time just to keep your body functional in a basic way while you sleep. However, when you add in something as complex as a 5.11G subliminal, you start to significantly change the calculus, because dividing attention only matters when that attention is required to use resources and put in effort to accomplish the task - which a subliminal is causing it to do. This is why turbulence happens: you are overloading parts of the subconscious. The attention isn't so much the problem as what you're tasking it to do with that attention. You have finite energy and brain chemistry resources, as well as finite cellular capacity, capability and resources as well. The subconscious in it's non-physical aspect does have a level that is connected to the infinite. But the parts that we use to make subliminals work are limited by the wetware interface you call "the brain". Quote:My argument is that what is (sic) someone out there believes that to be sexually attractive is to be a drunk alcoholic badass, and therefor, they become one as a result, and they start attracting sexual partners as a result,. This would of course means they achieving the goals of the program, but at a cost that other side of their life is taking a hit (negative results of being alcoholic for example) I don't follow what this has to do with dividing the attention and resources of the subconscious. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Ampersnd - 11-22-2024 (11-22-2024, 06:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-22-2024, 09:52 AM)Ampersnd Wrote: Most likely yes. Basically I should keep sticking it out? Thank you for your feedback. I'll put that in place, which will make my next loop start on Monday. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - thectexperience1 - 11-23-2024 My one change for DMSI 6G would be Chemical State-Shifting Override turned on. I'm personally "on" caffeine or alcohol almost all the time that I'm out and meeting new women. I don't want that to degrade the effects of DMSI any more than the raw biochemistry of the substances might. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - DMSIuser78 - 11-23-2024 (11-22-2024, 06:12 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-22-2024, 05:54 AM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: I already have GPR P18. I've used it a bit the last couple of days due to some intermittent neck pain, which is why I wanted to look up the product description in the store. The order date on mine says April 4 2020, so maybe it was on the old store? I'm not sure I can justify spending $450 on a subliminal I only use occasionally, so I think I'll stick with GPR P18 for now. Thanks for putting the GPR P18 description back up. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-23-2024 (11-23-2024, 03:11 AM)thectexperience1 Wrote: My one change for DMSI 6G would be Chemical State-Shifting Override turned on. I'm personally "on" caffeine or alcohol almost all the time that I'm out and meeting new women. I don't want that to degrade the effects of DMSI any more than the raw biochemistry of the substances might. I created DMSI without chemical state shifting override. Then I discovered that guys were doing dumb shit and messing it up. I added state shifting override to prevent that. Then guys complained that they had to smoke and drink more to get the same effects, which only meant that they were gonna do those things regardless. So I turned it off. Now you're asking for it, while telling me you plan to use them anyway. Here's the facts. It turns out that chemical state shift override isn't really useful. It just takes more attention and energy and tries to use it to un-do whatever you did to interfere with the program. Instead of choosing not to do those things, or allowing the program to override them, people just do more of them to get the same result. But you can not do things like drink and smoke marijuana and do recreational drugs and expect DMSI to work right all the time. Caffeine and nicotine aren't ideal, but they're nowhere hear as bad as the others. So I don't see the point in using it. It's much easier and more effective for you to determine what is too much of whatever drug you choose to use, and then use none or less than too much. |