Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-8) |
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Ampersnd - 11-22-2024 (11-21-2024, 08:58 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-21-2024, 07:44 PM)Ampersnd Wrote: I use it as described in the sales page. 40 minutes for 7 consecutive days, then off for 6. Most likely yes. Basically I should keep sticking it out? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (Yesterday, 05:54 AM)DMSIuser78 Wrote:(11-21-2024, 07:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: GPR P18-Elwood was set to "Draft" because it sold 0 copies after more than a year. How on earth does my end show 0 copies sold then? Huh... GPR P20 is 2 years more R&D on the skeleton script and on the key script. It works better and faster and doesn't require high volumes anymore. It also works for more issues. It's a 5.11G, which would be the standard $450 or $64.95/month. I'll enable GPR-P18 for you to read the description. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (Yesterday, 08:26 AM)samba99 Wrote:(11-21-2024, 07:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: DMSI will next be out after 6G is released. I cannot build it in 5.11G. RE #1: It has a sex drive enhancer in it already. Same script, IIRC. Orgasm enhancer for the woman, but can't necessarily include it for the man, because we're trying to prevent performance issues like PE. These will be improved significantly just by using newer skeleton script technology. #2: I have plans to look into making DMSI couples friendly. Should be doable, and it's been in the list for a long time. #3: You cannot divide your focus or attention without dividing your focus or attention. We can't do this one without dividing attention and focus. I suspect it would upset a lot of guys if I did this, especially before we have finished making it work for the majority. This one is not feasible: those goals aren't what DMSI is about. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (Yesterday, 08:45 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote:(Yesterday, 08:26 AM)samba99 Wrote: Yeah 6g would be nice. These are some of the features I would love to see and the reasoning behind it DMSI aimed at couples would be aimed at limiting the effects of the program as much as possible to your SO. That should be a natural automatic result. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (Yesterday, 09:52 AM)Ampersnd Wrote:(11-21-2024, 08:58 PM)Shannon Wrote: Do you think your response represents any sort of a resistance response? I suggest that you begin decreasing the days off my one per cycle and see if you can break through that. Don't go below 2 days off per cycle. And stop decreasing them if you break through that resistance. If you get through a cycle with just 2 days off and still don't see a change, let me know and we'll take it from there. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - NOMAD - 11-22-2024 (8 hours ago)Shannon Wrote: #3: You cannot divide your focus or attention without dividing your focus or attention. We can't do this one without dividing attention and focus. I suspect it would upset a lot of guys if I did this, especially before we have finished making it work for the majority. This one is not feasible: those goals aren't what DMSI is about. I agree 100% with everything stated here, particularly the old text. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - EvolvingPhoenix - 11-22-2024 (8 hours ago)Shannon Wrote:(Yesterday, 08:45 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: I agree. If I get a committed partner, I wanna still be able to use DMSI, but with more focus on that one partner rather than feeling tempted to cheat. And Using the sexual energy for self improvement (and maybe creativity, since that's what sexual energy seems particularly oriented towards) can definitely help with the not masturbating thing and with avoiding wet dreams as a result of not masturbating. And improving sexual performance once IN bed would be great! I agree with all of these requested features! So... for a DMSI aimed at your SO, just use DMSI? Sweet \m/ RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - samba99 - 11-22-2024 (8 hours ago)Shannon Wrote:(Yesterday, 08:26 AM)samba99 Wrote: Yeah 6g would be nice. These are some of the features I would love to see and the reasoning behind it Fair, however we are communicating with the subconscious mind, does the concept of dividing attention still applies here? I thought the sub mind is unlimited and does not work in a similar way as the conscious mind. My argument is that what is someone out there believes that to be sexually attractive is to be a drunk alcoholic badass, and therefor, they become one as a result, and they start attracting sexual partners as a result,. This would ofcourse means they achieving the goals of the program, but at a cost that other side of their life is taking a hit (negative results of being alcoholic for example) Above is only illustration example. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (7 hours ago)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote:(8 hours ago)Shannon Wrote: DMSI aimed at couples would be aimed at limiting the effects of the program as much as possible to your SO. That should be a natural automatic result. Not what I was trying to communicate. Allow me to be more specific. If you use DMSI for couples, focusing on your SO should be a natural and automatic result. Using the original will not be healthy for most relationships. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 11-22-2024 (6 hours ago)samba99 Wrote:(8 hours ago)Shannon Wrote: #3: You cannot divide your focus or attention without dividing your focus or attention. We can't do this one without dividing attention and focus. I suspect it would upset a lot of guys if I did this, especially before we have finished making it work for the majority. This one is not feasible: those goals aren't what DMSI is about. Dividing the attention of the subconscious mind would seem to be a rather preposterous notion, wouldn't it? After all, it is handing well over a million different functions all the time just to keep your body functional in a basic way while you sleep. However, when you add in something as complex as a 5.11G subliminal, you start to significantly change the calculus, because dividing attention only matters when that attention is required to use resources and put in effort to accomplish the task - which a subliminal is causing it to do. This is why turbulence happens: you are overloading parts of the subconscious. The attention isn't so much the problem as what you're tasking it to do with that attention. You have finite energy and brain chemistry resources, as well as finite cellular capacity, capability and resources as well. The subconscious in it's non-physical aspect does have a level that is connected to the infinite. But the parts that we use to make subliminals work are limited by the wetware interface you call "the brain". Quote:My argument is that what is (sic) someone out there believes that to be sexually attractive is to be a drunk alcoholic badass, and therefor, they become one as a result, and they start attracting sexual partners as a result,. This would of course means they achieving the goals of the program, but at a cost that other side of their life is taking a hit (negative results of being alcoholic for example) I don't follow what this has to do with dividing the attention and resources of the subconscious. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Ampersnd - 11-22-2024 (8 hours ago)Shannon Wrote:(Yesterday, 09:52 AM)Ampersnd Wrote: Most likely yes. Basically I should keep sticking it out? Thank you for your feedback. I'll put that in place, which will make my next loop start on Monday. |