![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Fluffy - 05-24-2018 @Shannon Is social skills and sense of humor aspect, directly dealt with in DMSI already? If not, do you plan to directly touch on that? Based on what you have observed, will you be making any improvements to ARA that is in DMSI? In 3.3, will you be adding something for the "down" negative effects, that a person such as myself experiences after releasing/orgasming with a woman, that takes a week to recover from? Do you think DMSI 3.3 will be released by August 2018? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 05-24-2018 (05-21-2018, 12:00 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-17-2018, 03:48 PM)Have at ye Wrote:(05-17-2018, 08:20 AM)kingpill Wrote: Ive noticed girls smiling a lot around me looking at me etc but ONLY WHEN THEY THINK I DONT NOTICE. As soon as I glance at them, they frown, then go back to smiling at me again thinking I dont see it. I was thinking along the same lines. For a female it currently probably feels somewhat as if a guy were to gather up his courage to approach an extremely attractive, high-class woman by saying "Hi!" and heard "I'm totally going to give you a BJ right here and now" in response. So might be somewhat... scary and confusing, to say the least. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 08:12 AM)CatMan Wrote:(05-24-2018, 12:28 AM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, I just noticed that my earphones are "broken" and the left side is playing at a lower volume than the right earpiece. I don't know how long this has been going on. Would this volume difference between left and right earphone affect the sub's effects? Well I actually listened to music with them, and tried it with different headphones on the same phone, and put the headphones on my computer. It still indicated it was the headphone's problem. Tongue I didn't know shannon's files do that already though? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 03:27 PM)dissonance Wrote:(05-24-2018, 08:12 AM)CatMan Wrote:(05-24-2018, 12:28 AM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, I just noticed that my earphones are "broken" and the left side is playing at a lower volume than the right earpiece. I don't know how long this has been going on. Would this volume difference between left and right earphone affect the sub's effects? The files don't do that on some players, and do it on others, apparently. It does not happen on my players. Part of what I do in creating them is channel equalization, so I don't know how it could be the files. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 12:28 AM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, I just noticed that my earphones are "broken" and the left side is playing at a lower volume than the right earpiece. I don't know how long this has been going on. Would this volume difference between left and right earphone affect the sub's effects? It will affect the effects of the sub, if it is present. It depends on the difference in volume. If it's only a few decibels, as most people report, not something to worry about. But this phenomenon doesn't happen to everyone. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 01:53 AM)Kol Wrote: @Shannon, You would do well to start asking "why". Why am I resisting this woman? Why do I have this response to her? Is it something she said? Why do I respond this way? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon No. Quote:If not, do you plan to directly touch on that? If the goal is for you to have to do nothing, and get results, why would I start adding training wheels again? You are still trying to pursue her, which is the antithesis of the goals of this program. Quote:Based on what you have observed, will you be making any improvements to ARA that is in DMSI? I will be making some improvements that result in ARA in the script working better, but those improvements will also result in everything else working better as well. Quote:In 3.3, will you be adding something for the "down" negative effects, that a person such as myself experiences after releasing/orgasming with a woman, that takes a week to recover from? I'm not sure that is appropriate to add. I'm also not sure what I would add to counter that, since I don't know what is causing it. Quote:Do you think DMSI 3.3 will be released by August 2018? One can certainly hope. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch. Are you saying this is what you believe you can achieve Shannon? Did those famous rock stars like Elvis, the Beatles, and Michael Jackson gave poor social skills? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - mat422 - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch. Unless an individual is on the autism spectrum I don't really believe in poor social skills. I'd argue what most people deem poor social skills are really just a lack of confidence in oneself mixed with fear. You're kind of jumping to extremes here sarge and I don't really get your point you're making. Most people aren't as bad socially as they appear to themselves. Besides does it really matter if Shannon's program can't result in an anti-social person attracting 10s? All that really matters is that it works for you right? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 05:03 PM)mat422 Wrote:(05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: The thing that gets me is how an antisocial person with poor social skills could possibly have 10s pursuing him for sex. That seems like a bit of a stretch. Well, I believe I’m like that myself which is why I ask. In that case, social skills may be more important than aura. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon Elvis was terrible with women, as the story goes. I'd say Michael Jackson was quite the weirdo, too (I've always felt kinda sorry for the guy). I don't know about the Beatles, though. ![]() Rock stars are quite often antisocial, insane or obnoxious, or all of the above at the same time. Same goes for certain famous actors. Why? Because they can, basically. You don't really need social skills when everyone around you is doing everything they can to accommodate you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 05:53 PM)Have at ye Wrote:(05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon I thought Elvis had tons of girls? The Beatles too? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 06:01 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(05-24-2018, 05:53 PM)Have at ye Wrote:(05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon Well, yeah. But Elvis would reportedly only sleep with his fans, and only the really young ones, too, because he'd feel really, really insecure otherwise. I don't know about all of 'em Beatles, but John Lennon ended up with Yoko Ono. 'nuff said. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-24-2018 (05-24-2018, 04:07 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(05-24-2018, 04:01 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-24-2018, 10:05 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon Once again, Sarge, you're looking for proof that you're right, even if that means you must fail to do it. Looking for why you can't will result in more of why you can't. If you want to be right about why you can't, then stop using DMSI and start using something else, and then be happy because you were right. Otherwise, stop insisting you can't and open your mind to an alternate experience that only you are preventing yourself from having. Famous people often have worse than poor social skills. They don't need social skills because THEY'RE FAMOUS. People will do the work for them. |