![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-22-2016 (02-21-2016, 06:53 PM)CatMan Wrote:(02-21-2016, 02:52 PM)dissonance Wrote: BIATBWS, instead of BIATBW, in my opinion. I still think EHPRA 2.0 will be a good call, and I stand by my recommendation of alternating the two. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-22-2016 (02-21-2016, 07:22 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(02-21-2016, 07:12 PM)CatMan Wrote:(02-21-2016, 07:05 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: BIATBWS+DAOS 5G looks VERY appealling. I could start using the 4G version of BIATBWS right now actually, but I wanna be patient and work towards the SM3, which is way more powerful. I hate waiting haha. I hope you have done AM6 before you do SM3. Just deciding you're ready based on believing you have the bullet points won't work. There are good reasons we require AM before SM. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 01:05 AM)Shannon Wrote:(02-21-2016, 07:22 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(02-21-2016, 07:12 PM)CatMan Wrote:(02-21-2016, 07:05 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: BIATBWS+DAOS 5G looks VERY appealling. I could start using the 4G version of BIATBWS right now actually, but I wanna be patient and work towards the SM3, which is way more powerful. I hate waiting haha. Yep, I'm starting stage 2 of AM6 tomorrow. So far it's going really well. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bliss - 02-22-2016 Hey Shannon, in the sales page of OGSF 5G you say the program's designed to replace guilt, shame and fear with their opposites. What are they? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 01:09 AM)bliss Wrote: Hey Shannon, in the sales page of OGSF 5G you say the program's designed to replace guilt, shame and fear with their opposites. What are they? Your subconscious knows what they are, and that's really all that matters. I have come to the conclusion that the subconscious works with emotions in ways that we don't consciously recognize, which would be analogous to visually representing it as a concentration of energy that has a specific vibration and thus a specific color. In such an analogy, you could think of it along the lines of, if you invert the color, you invert the energy. It's of course not exactly like that, as inverting the literal waveform of light does not give darkness, nor adjusting red to green give a reversal of waveform either. But the analogy works; we don't consciously have to know the answer. The subconscious does. Now that said, according to me (and I reserve the right to be wrong) the reverse of guilt is joy, the reverse of shame is happiness and the reverse of fear is love. Really I am only confident on the reverse of fear being love. But the other two seem to make sense, as they are what results when guilt and shame are taken away. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 02-22-2016 I'm pretty surprised with how excited I am over starting EPRHA 2.0 when it's finished. I'll be starting me and my girlfriend on it basically the day it's done (2 purchases as we don't live together unfortunately haha). I've already done the free version of EPRHA and I felt it was worthwhile, but seeing all of the bells and whistles added into 2.0 is really making me think it is one of the better programs you have available. Just that followed up with AM or AF looks like it'll help change a person into a totally different and positive version of who they are. The synochrity of the sub coming out for both me and my girlfriend as I was about to start us down a slightly different route is a very pleasant surprise, as I hadn't looked into the 2.0 version at all until this last week or so when it popped up on my radar. Thank you for all of the work you're putting into this. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 02-22-2016 My goal with it is to make it useful for people with combat related PTSD and domestic trauma PTSD such as might be experienced from severe physical, emotional, verbal or sexual abuse. If I can do that, it should be good for everybody. That's why I'm putting in so much work: I want it to be useful to everybody, including our military vets and people who have been through severe abuse and traumatic experiences like rape. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 07:55 AM)Shannon Wrote: My goal with it is to make it useful for people with combat related PTSD and domestic trauma PTSD such as might be experienced from severe physical, emotional, verbal or sexual abuse. If I can do that, it should be good for everybody. That's why I'm putting in so much work: I want it to be useful to everybody, including our military vets and people who have been through severe abuse and traumatic experiences like rape. This program sounds like it is going to be total epic experience when it is finally released! Plus, I like how you are adding things in it to help out military personnel and offering at only $89! Which is a steal with all the stuff you are putting into it. Imagine the people who run this program for six months to a year and then run the current version of AM afterwards?! I wonder what kind of results would occur if going this route? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 02-22-2016 I wonder what the surprise is in EPRHA 2.0. Man I hate waiting for surprises lol RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 08:39 AM)spiritman Wrote: This program sounds like it is going to be total epic experience when it is finally released! Plus, I like how you are adding things in it to help out military personnel and offering at only $89! Which is a steal with all the stuff you are putting into it. That's exactly my plan. I'll let you know a year to a year and a half from now ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 12:53 AM)Shannon Wrote:(02-21-2016, 03:00 AM)LionKing Wrote:(02-20-2016, 07:23 PM)Shannon Wrote: But after thinking about it, I think perhaps running EHPRA 2.0 may also be a good idea for you, as it seems this is all the result of emotional damage or trauma caused by the females you experienced early in life. So my recommendation is, a month of OF5G and then a month of EHPRA 2.0, repeated until you think you can handle SM. Then run a month of AM6 refresher and then SM3 or 4, if it's out at the time. But if he did switch to EPRHA 2.0 full time, can you estimate how much longer it would take for those fears to be removed? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaRomeo - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 01:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: I will tell you this. During my break yesterday, I started tinkering with creating an active manifestation script. At the moment it's aimed at manifesting one's perfect lifelong friends with benefits relationship with a stunningly beautiful woman, but that may change if I conclude that it is not really feasible. BOOM! Now THAT would be awesome addition to the future line of relationship related manifestation subs, and great partly script to include to sub such as the ultimate non-monogamous bad ass program I suggested HERE (to which you replied you have been thinking to possibly build something similar to that in the future...). I know we are looking into the long distant and not crystal clear future here, but just to get the creative juices flowing...which I´m sure you already have up to your nose already but hey, creative juices never killed anyone as far as I know. But even by itself manifesting lifelong FWB with SBW would be a great one. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 10:54 AM)maxx55 Wrote: That's exactly my plan. I'll let you know a year to a year and a half from now That will make two of us who will be doing this. It will be interesting to see how my results will turn out with AM/SM3. After running EPHRA 2.0 for six months to a year. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 02-22-2016 (02-22-2016, 11:01 AM)maxx55 Wrote: But if he did switch to EPRHA 2.0 full time, can you estimate how much longer it would take for those fears to be removed? That's probably impossible to tell, obviously. However, I've seen some signs OF5G is breaking through as of this past weekend. So, some small progress is happening. I don't want to start doing too many programs, as I want to use AM/SM again soon. It's already been FAR longer than the recommended "use them once a year for the first 3 years" mantra Shannon mentions in the manuals. To follow that timetable, that'd mean in October 2015, I'd be rerunning AM6. It's February 2016 now and still no start of AM6, so I don't want to let it go much longer before rerunning to keep moving forward. I don't want too much more time to lapse before rerunning to minimise any further fade of the programming. I think I may have to run OF5G for awhile longer, and then go back into AM6 with even HIGHER hours than before. I've even considered a 32 day refresher of AM6 and then a full rerun of SM3 at even higher hours than the last run as well. I don't want to fall further behind the recommended guidelines is all. |