Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-8)



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 10-26-2024

I hope you guys have as much fun using it as was had testing it. Very much appreciate the support.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - 4Kingdoms - 10-26-2024

(10-26-2024, 12:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: I hope you guys have as much fun using it as was had testing it. Very much appreciate the support.

Get your copy here:

Sexual Arousal Magnifier Subliminal v2.1-B (Premium 5.11G - Type A/B/C/D Hybrid)
https://subliminal-shop.com/collections/latest-releases/products/sexual-arousal-magnifier-subliminal-sarm-v2-1-b-5-11g-type-a-b-c-d-hybrid


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - ichigo - 10-28-2024

(10-26-2024, 12:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: I hope you guys have as much fun using it as was had testing it. Very much appreciate the support.

Thank you Shannon, I'm not using it yet but wanted to buy it while it's available. Will let you know any results when I have a consenting partner to use it with.

Couple questions if you don't mind:

1.) I'm running X4A 5.11G currently. If I do run SARM 2.1B for short-term usage whilst I'm using X4A as my main sub, are the two going to cause conflicting results? Like my aura communicating one thing and SARM communicating another to the woman? Or would they have a synergistic effect?

2.) I ran the previous X4A 5.9G (I think, the previous generation anyway) and had best results at 8 loops which you'd recommended for inexperienced people / virgins. Is there another usage pattern for X4A 5.11G you'd recommend for inexperienced people? I'm getting okay results with the 1 loop 5 days on 3 days off with the new X4A, but my results were more blatant with 8 loops of the previous X4A. 

Thank you


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 10-28-2024

(10-28-2024, 04:19 AM)ichigo Wrote:
(10-26-2024, 12:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: I hope you guys have as much fun using it as was had testing it. Very much appreciate the support.

Thank you Shannon, I'm not using it yet but wanted to buy it while it's available. Will let you know any results when I have a consenting partner to use it with.

Couple questions if you don't mind:

1.) I'm running X4A 5.11G currently. If I do run SARM 2.1B for short-term usage whilst I'm using X4A as my main sub, are the two going to cause conflicting results? Like my aura communicating one thing and SARM communicating another to the woman? Or would they have a synergistic effect?

SARM v2.1-B will mop the floor with X4A-1511 and then toss it out with the dirty water.  They are not synergistic, and should not be used together.  Nothing should be used in concert with SARM v2.1-B.  It has an impact rating many orders of magnitude higher than anything else ever made.

Quote:2.) I ran the previous X4A 5.9G (I think, the previous generation anyway) and had best results at 8 loops which you'd recommended for inexperienced people / virgins. Is there another usage pattern for X4A 5.11G you'd recommend for inexperienced people? I'm getting okay results with the 1 loop 5 days on 3 days off with the new X4A, but my results were more blatant with 8 loops of the previous X4A. 

Thank you

For inexperienced users and virgins, they will most frequently get the best results from X4A-1511 using the currently specified volume and on/off days of use, but at 7 (seven) loops per day on.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - ichigo - 10-28-2024

Thanks Shannon.

So if you were me, would you start running SARM 2.1B by yourself (only exposing yourself until you had a consenting partner) using the long term usage patterns over X4A 5.11g? If I did that what would be the result, high levels of self sexual arousal but without an aura that would target and act as an aphrodisiac on others?

Or is it possible that whatever SARM 2.1B would turn my own aura into would act as an aphrodisiac to women around me?

I guess it would be good to run SARM 2.1B solo as I just spent all this money on it until I get a consenting partner…. But if my goal is to arouse attractive women around me as quickly and effectively as possible, is X4A 5.11g still the better option?

Thank you


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - papagani24 - 10-28-2024

Hello, I am entering my 6th week of DMSI 3.5. I started with 2 loops of Ultrasonic and I am now in my 6th week. I have been increasing each cycle and now I am continuing with 8 loops of Ultrasonic. However, the problem is that I have not yet seen the benefits promised by the program, except for the small ones and the ones that I have already experienced normally before starting the program. I listen on my phone and I adjust the sound with the ocean sound, which corresponds to about 10-11 clicks with the phone speaker. I can't figure out exactly what I need to do to use the program more effectively. Should I continue like this for a while, should I switch to hybrid or should I give up DMSI and go in a different direction?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 10-28-2024

(10-28-2024, 01:53 PM)ichigo Wrote: Thanks Shannon.

So if you were me, would you start running SARM 2.1B by yourself (only exposing yourself until you had a consenting partner) using the long term usage patterns over X4A 5.11g? If I did that what would be the result, high levels of self sexual arousal but without an aura that would target and act as an aphrodisiac on others?

Or is it possible that whatever SARM 2.1B would turn my own aura into would act as an aphrodisiac to women around me?

I guess it would be good to run SARM 2.1B solo as I just spent all this money on it until I get a consenting partner…. But if my goal is to arouse attractive women around me as quickly and effectively as possible, is X4A 5.11g still the better option?

Thank you

SARM v2.1-B is designed to be a Direct Exposure Aphrodisiac.  It is focused primarily on affecting the female(s) in the proximity when it is played.

The reason you would expose yourself to it is to understand how it affects you, so you are not caught off guard by some effect it has while you expose the female(s) you're exposing to it.  It is not intended to be used by a man for long or medium term programming for himself, and it does not affect your aura aside from how your aura would naturally change specifically as a result of you becoming more aroused sexually.

SARM is going to produce a very powerful arousal in those women who are exposed.  However, it's not designed for instant or even rapid effect.  It takes 3 hours of exposure for "fast" results.  That's because it specifically focuses on arousing primarily women, and doing so at a speed that works best for her.  

It is designed for use by couples who both know about and consent to it's use, and can use it with sufficient time and exposure to allow it to work.  It can be used in other ways, but the focus on arousing the female(s) at the best speed for them dominates how and when it can reasonably be used.

For that reason, X4A-1511 is likely a better and more flexible choice for you unless and until you have a woman who is available for such exposures times to SARM v2.1-B.

In case you're interested, I have done experiments with high speed arousal using subliminals.  It works just fine with guys, but women almost always respond with either an effort to escape, or stonewalling.  I stopped doing that experimentation years ago, so I don't know if stonewalling is still possible, but what good is arousing a woman if she responds by trying to escape?  Thus the focus on going at her speed in modern aphrodisiacs.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 10-28-2024

(10-28-2024, 02:30 PM)papagani24 Wrote: Hello, I am entering my 6th week of DMSI 3.5. I started with 2 loops of Ultrasonic and I am now in my 6th week. I have been increasing each cycle and now I am continuing with 8 loops of Ultrasonic. However, the problem is that I have not yet seen the benefits promised by the program, except for the small ones and the ones that I have already experienced normally before starting the program. I listen on my phone and I adjust the sound with the ocean sound, which corresponds to about 10-11 clicks with the phone speaker. I can't figure out exactly what I need to do to use the program more effectively. Should I continue like this for a while, should I switch to hybrid or should I give up DMSI and go in a different direction?

How long did you use DMSI at the instructed number of loops before changing it?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - papagani24 - 10-28-2024

(10-28-2024, 05:17 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-28-2024, 02:30 PM)papagani24 Wrote: Hello, I am entering my 6th week of DMSI 3.5. I started with 2 loops of Ultrasonic and I am now in my 6th week. I have been increasing each cycle and now I am continuing with 8 loops of Ultrasonic. However, the problem is that I have not yet seen the benefits promised by the program, except for the small ones and the ones that I have already experienced normally before starting the program. I listen on my phone and I adjust the sound with the ocean sound, which corresponds to about 10-11 clicks with the phone speaker. I can't figure out exactly what I need to do to use the program more effectively. Should I continue like this for a while, should I switch to hybrid or should I give up DMSI and go in a different direction?

How long did you use DMSI at the instructed number of loops before changing it?

I increased the loops at the end of each cycle. So I listened to 2 loops for 4 days, took a break for 1 day and then continued for 4 days as 3 loops. I think this is called a cycle, in short, I increased it depending on whether I saw results in each cycle.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 10-28-2024

(10-28-2024, 06:13 PM)papagani24 Wrote:
(10-28-2024, 05:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: How long did you use DMSI at the instructed number of loops before changing it?

I increased the loops at the end of each cycle. So I listened to 2 loops for 4 days, took a break for 1 day and then continued for 4 days as 3 loops. I think this is called a cycle, in short, I increased it depending on whether I saw results in each cycle.

And why did you do that?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - papagani24 - 10-28-2024

(10-28-2024, 08:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-28-2024, 06:13 PM)papagani24 Wrote: I increased the loops at the end of each cycle. So I listened to 2 loops for 4 days, took a break for 1 day and then continued for 4 days as 3 loops. I think this is called a cycle, in short, I increased it depending on whether I saw results in each cycle.

And why did you do that?

Because the product page says “Start with Ultrasonic Format, 2 loops per day on.  Do one ASRB2 cycle of that (4 days on, 1 day off). Increase the number of loops per day on by +1 per ASRB2 cycle until you start getting results.” Since I didn't think I saw any significant results, I increased it by +1 until I did. Did I misunderstand?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - Shannon - 10-29-2024

(10-28-2024, 08:22 PM)papagani24 Wrote:
(10-28-2024, 08:05 PM)Shannon Wrote: And why did you do that?

Because the product page says “Start with Ultrasonic Format, 2 loops per day on.  Do one ASRB2 cycle of that (4 days on, 1 day off). Increase the number of loops per day on by +1 per ASRB2 cycle until you start getting results.” Since I didn't think I saw any significant results, I increased it by +1 until I did. Did I misunderstand?

No.  It's just hard to remember all the instructions for everything, so I ask questions to better understand the situation.

You have gotten up to 8 loops per day on of Ultrasonic and haven't noticed results?  What have you noticed?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - ncbeareatingman - 10-29-2024

Shannon's words:
"Once I get this script finished, it is a matter of changing the specific goal of the manifestation and rebuilding the program to have a new title. That said, I'll be building this one in 5.11G and probably not another manifestor until 6G has been published and the first however many titles have been published in it.

In 6G this means I may be able to make between 2 and 4 of these per month. So when the time comes for me to work on manifestors in 6G, we should be able to build out the library of them relatively quickly.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator "

Me: As Far as Manifestation goes,
I sincerely hope that include's, the Money One's, the Money Titles, UMS, USLM,etc... ( I know,I know, LM may not be included in US, but Maybe it will be amoung the versions of US, USLM 6G,ect?)


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8 - papagani24 - 10-29-2024

(10-29-2024, 10:25 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(10-28-2024, 08:22 PM)papagani24 Wrote: Because the product page says “Start with Ultrasonic Format, 2 loops per day on.  Do one ASRB2 cycle of that (4 days on, 1 day off). Increase the number of loops per day on by +1 per ASRB2 cycle until you start getting results.” Since I didn't think I saw any significant results, I increased it by +1 until I did. Did I misunderstand?

No.  It's just hard to remember all the instructions for everything, so I ask questions to better understand the situation.

You have gotten up to 8 loops per day on of Ultrasonic and haven't noticed results?  What have you noticed?

Yes, I went loop by loop and I got to 8 loops with US. As I said, apart from the classic glances, maybe a few smiles from a few cashiers or waiters, there has not yet been anything like someone initiating or, if not taking full responsibility in this direction, at least pointing in this direction, maybe more than usual. I think from what I've read, it can take some time for the DMSI to gather its strength. But so far I haven't experienced anything unusual, except for what I have already experienced before using the program. This is more or less what I experienced in 8 loops and in other loops until I got to 8 loops, there is actually nothing extraordinary to write as a feedback. Don't misunderstand, I'm not trying to badmouth the program here, I'm just trying to figure out how to use it more efficiently.

Edit: In the meantime, let me write down a few things that I have experienced that are different than before the program to help you: the biggest difference I see is that I am really hungry. It is also interesting that I have not gained weight by eating so much regardless of the program. Secondly, there is a significant increase in sexual desire compared to before. Other than that, there is nothing I can say is very different.